Faculty of Sociology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Institute of Sociology and Social Psychology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 28;18(11):e0284892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284892. eCollection 2023.
Measuring subjective well-being in a multidimensional, valid, reliable, and parsimonious way is important for both social science research and social policy. Here, we present an efficient measure of distinct domains of subjective well-being and overall flourishing. The Flourishing Index (FI) consists of five sub-domains: 1. happiness and life satisfaction, 2. physical and mental health, 3. meaning and purpose, 4. character and virtue, and 5. close social relationships. The Secure Flourishing Index (SFI) adds the sub-domain financial and material stability, which is thought to be necessary to sustain the other domains over time. We developed a German version of these measures in a multi-stage translation and scale testing process. The results of an exploratory factor analysis in Study 1 (N = 192) suggest a unidimensional structure of the FI and a two-dimensional structure of the SFI. Moreover, both indices (and most sub-domains) revealed acceptable to good reliability. The factor structures were confirmed in Study 2 (N = 13,268). We provide indications for measurement invariance of both indices with regard to gender and age. We furthermore examined inter-correlations with related constructs such as importance of health, self-efficacy, and social support. Study 3 (N = 317) finds evidence for high convergent validity of both the FI and the SFI with overall well-being as well as sub-scores of the PERMA-Profiler. These results suggest that the FI and the SFI are efficient measures of distinct domains of subjective well-being and overall flourishing. Our translation of the FI and SFI, along with the empirical relationships that we found among the measures that we reviewed, will help scholars in Germany (and beyond) explore an expanded range of domains of well-being, including the comparatively neglected domains of character and virtue, physical health, and financial and material stability.
以多维、有效、可靠和简约的方式衡量主观幸福感,对于社会科学研究和社会政策都很重要。在这里,我们提出了一种衡量主观幸福感和整体繁荣的不同领域的有效方法。繁荣指数(FI)由五个子领域组成:1. 幸福和生活满意度,2. 身心健康,3. 意义和目的,4. 性格和美德,5. 亲密的社会关系。安全繁荣指数(SFI)增加了财务和物质稳定的子领域,这被认为是随着时间的推移维持其他领域的必要条件。我们在一个多阶段的翻译和量表测试过程中开发了这些措施的德语版本。研究 1(N=192)中探索性因素分析的结果表明,FI 具有单一维度结构,SFI 具有二维结构。此外,这两个指数(以及大多数子领域)都表现出可接受至良好的可靠性。在研究 2(N=13268)中,该结构得到了确认。我们提供了这两个指数在性别和年龄方面具有测量不变性的迹象。我们还研究了与相关结构的相互关系,例如健康的重要性、自我效能和社会支持。研究 3(N=317)发现,FI 和 SFI 与整体幸福感以及 PERMA-Profiler 的子分数具有高度的聚合效度。这些结果表明,FI 和 SFI 是衡量主观幸福感和整体繁荣的不同领域的有效方法。我们对 FI 和 SFI 的翻译,以及我们在研究中发现的这些措施之间的实证关系,将帮助德国(及其他地区)的学者探索更广泛的幸福感领域,包括相对被忽视的性格和美德、身心健康以及财务和物质稳定领域。