Assari Shervin, Azad Mahbube Askari, Zare Hossein
1 Department of Family Medicine, Charles R Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, California, USA. 2 Department of Internal Medicine, Charles R Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, California, USA. 3 Department of Urban Public Health, Charles R Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, California, USA. 4 Marginalization-Related Diminished Returns (MDRs) Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Glob J Epidemol Infect Dis. 2024;4(1):20-33. doi: 10.31586/gjeid.2024.1014. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
Previous research has underscored the link between allostatic load-a comprehensive indicator of the cumulative physiological burden of chronic stress-and depression. However, there remains a significant gap in understanding how this relationship may differ across race and sex intersectional groups. This study aimed to investigate variations in the association between elevated allostatic load (AL>4) and depression among different race-sex intersectional groups within the general population.
This cross-sectional secondary analysis utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) spanning 2005-2018. The analysis included variables such as race, sex, age, socioeconomic status, depression (measured via the Patient Health Questionnaire - PHQ), and allostatic load. Linear regression analyses were conducted to examine the interactions between race and sex with allostatic load, focusing on the likelihood of high depression as the outcome.
Across the pooled sample, an allostatic load greater than 4 was significantly associated with increased depression. Notably, an interaction effect was observed between race and AL>4 on depression among women, indicating that non-Hispanic Black women with a high allostatic load exhibited more pronounced depressive symptoms (Beta: 1.09, CI: 0.02-2.61). Conversely, among men, allostatic load greater than 4 neither correlated with nor interacted with race to influence depression levels.
The study highlights the critical need to consider allostatic load as a key intervention point for preventing or reducing depression, particularly among Black women. These findings underscore the necessity for customized intervention strategies that address the nuanced race-sex disparities in the impact of allostatic load on mental health across populations.
先前的研究强调了应激负荷——慢性应激累积生理负担的综合指标——与抑郁症之间的联系。然而,在理解这种关系在不同种族和性别交叉群体中可能存在何种差异方面,仍存在重大差距。本研究旨在调查一般人群中不同种族 - 性别交叉群体之间,高应激负荷(AL>4)与抑郁症之间关联的差异。
这项横断面二次分析利用了2005 - 2018年国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)的数据。分析包括种族、性别、年龄、社会经济地位、抑郁症(通过患者健康问卷 - PHQ测量)和应激负荷等变量。进行线性回归分析以检验种族和性别与应激负荷之间的相互作用,重点关注以高抑郁症可能性作为结果。
在汇总样本中,应激负荷大于4与抑郁症增加显著相关。值得注意的是,在女性中观察到种族与AL>4对抑郁症的交互作用,表明应激负荷高的非西班牙裔黑人女性表现出更明显的抑郁症状(β:1.09,CI:0.02 - 2.61)。相反,在男性中,应激负荷大于4与种族既无关联也无相互作用来影响抑郁水平。
该研究强调迫切需要将应激负荷视为预防或减少抑郁症的关键干预点,尤其是在黑人女性中。这些发现强调了制定定制干预策略的必要性,以解决不同人群中应激负荷对心理健康影响方面细微的种族 - 性别差异。