Han Jingying, Wang Jing, Wang Qian, Li Yuan, Li Tian, Zhang Jian, Sun Hui
Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong 250021, P.R. China.
Oncol Lett. 2024 Jul 26;28(4):460. doi: 10.3892/ol.2024.14593. eCollection 2024 Oct.
The prevalence of thyroid carcinoma is increasing, and papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most frequent subtype. More and more attention is being concentrated on the association between inflammation indicators and malignant tumors. The aim of the present study was to analyze whether the preoperative red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and platelet parameters, including mean platelet volume (MPV) and platelet distribution width (PDW), can be applied to distinguish between patients with PTC or papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) and healthy controls, and to explore the associations with clinicopathological characteristics. The study retrospectively compared the RDW, MPV and PDW values of 780 patients with PTC or PTMC against a healthy control group. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were conducted to determine diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore, the clinicopathological features of the patients with PTC or PTMC were compared between higher and lower platelet parameter groups based on the RDW, MPV and PDW values. Significantly higher preoperative RDW, MPV and PDW values were found in patients with PTC or PTMC compared with those of the healthy group. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) plus 95% confidence interval (95% CI) values of RDW, MPV and PDW were 0.808 (0.780-0.835), 0.771 (0.743-0.799) and 0.711 (0.681-0.742), respectively. When RDW and MPV were combined together, the AUC (95% CI) value was enhanced to 0.858 (0.835-0.881) for the patients with PTC. For the patients with PTMC, RDW, MPV and PDW had AUC (95% CI) values of 0.812 (0.783-0.840), 0.779 (0.749-0.808) and 0.718 (0.685-0.751), respectively. When RDW and MPV were combined together, the AUC (95% CI) value was enhanced to 0.858 (0.835-0.881). A higher RDW was significantly associated with being female, deeper tumor infiltration, and normal FT3 and FT4 levels. A higher PDW was significantly associated with elevated thyrotropin receptor antibody levels. In conclusion, as convenient and available inflammation indicators, RDW, PDW and MPV have diagnostic ability and can distinguish between patients with PTC or PTMC and healthy controls. In addition, the combined application of RDW and MPV can improve the diagnostic power. The values of RDW and MPV were associated with clinicopathological characteristics. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to prove the usefulness of preoperative RDW combined with MPV in diagnosing patients with PTC or PTMC.
甲状腺癌的发病率正在上升,其中乳头状甲状腺癌(PTC)是最常见的亚型。越来越多的关注集中在炎症指标与恶性肿瘤之间的关联上。本研究的目的是分析术前红细胞分布宽度(RDW)和血小板参数,包括平均血小板体积(MPV)和血小板分布宽度(PDW),是否可用于区分PTC或甲状腺微小乳头状癌(PTMC)患者与健康对照,并探讨其与临床病理特征的关联。该研究回顾性比较了780例PTC或PTMC患者与健康对照组的RDW、MPV和PDW值。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线以确定诊断准确性。此外,根据RDW、MPV和PDW值,比较了血小板参数较高和较低组的PTC或PTMC患者的临床病理特征。与健康组相比,PTC或PTMC患者术前的RDW、MPV和PDW值显著更高。ROC曲线分析显示,RDW、MPV和PDW的曲线下面积(AUC)加95%置信区间(95%CI)值分别为0.808(0.780 - 0.835)、0.771(0.743 - 0.799)和0.711(0.681 - 0.742)。当将RDW和MPV联合使用时,PTC患者的AUC(95%CI)值提高到0.858(0.835 - 0.881)。对于PTMC患者,RDW、MPV和PDW的AUC(95%CI)值分别为0.812(0.783 - 0.840)、0.779(0.749 - 0.808)和0.718(0.685 - 0.751)。当将RDW和MPV联合使用时,AUC(95%CI)值提高到0.858(0.835 - 0.881)。较高的RDW与女性、肿瘤浸润深度增加以及游离三碘甲状腺原氨酸(FT3)和游离甲状腺素(FT4)水平正常显著相关。较高的PDW与促甲状腺素受体抗体水平升高显著相关。总之,作为方便可得的炎症指标,RDW、PDW和MPV具有诊断能力,可区分PTC或PTMC患者与健康对照。此外,RDW和MPV的联合应用可提高诊断效能。RDW和MPV值与临床病理特征相关。据我们所知,这是第一项证明术前RDW联合MPV对诊断PTC或PTMC患者有用性的研究。