Skujytė Austra, Lukonaitienė Inga, Stanislovaitienė Jūratė, Šilinskas Viktoras, Bradauskienė Kristina, Mamkus Gediminas, Kamandulis Sigitas
Institute of Sports Science and Innovation, Lithuanian Sports University, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Sports Coaching Department, Lithuanian Sports University, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Jul 25;6:1412861. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1412861. eCollection 2024.
Advancements in technology have recently made it possible to implement effective training solutions across different environmental conditions. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of measures obtained from the innovative motorized device, Alex7 (Inosportas, Lithuania), and differences in speed and kinematic characteristics between resisted and assisted sprinting in young football players.
Twenty-seven male athletes (mean age: 16.5 ± 0.8 years; height: 179.5 ± 6.9 cm; body weight: 67.7 ± 8.3 kg) each performed 30-m sprints twice under three different conditions: regular, resisted, and assisted sprinting. The Alex7 device provided the assistance and resistance during sprints. Results were compared with those from Witty timing gates. Ground contact time, flight time, stride length, and pace were measured using the OptoJump system. Reliability was assessed using two-way mixed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for single measures, the standard error of the mean (SEM), and the coefficient of variation (CV). Pearson's correlation coefficient determined the associations between Alex7 and Witty timing systems. Criterion-referenced validity was based on the mean difference and CV. Systematic bias was determined by limits of agreement using Bland-Altman analysis.
Running times obtained using the Alex7 equipment exhibited good to excellent test-retest reliability between sessions (ICC, 0.83-0.94) and good to excellent correlation (Pearson's = 0.88-0.98) between the Alex7 and Witty systems in both assisted and resisted running conditions. However, the Alex7 device consistently produced longer running times than the Witty device (up to 0.16 s difference, < 0.001). The different running conditions produced substantial variations in kinematic variables, such as stride length, ground contact time, and running speed ( < 0.001 for all), but the effects on flight time and running pace were smaller.
The Alex7 device shows high reliability for creating resisted and assisted running conditions for young football players. However, it tends to overestimate running time, necessitating caution when assessing the time parameters.
近年来技术的进步使得在不同环境条件下实施有效的训练解决方案成为可能。本研究评估了从创新的电动设备Alex7(立陶宛Inosportas公司)获得的测量结果的可靠性和有效性,以及年轻足球运动员在阻力冲刺和助力冲刺之间的速度和运动学特征差异。
27名男性运动员(平均年龄:16.5±0.8岁;身高:179.5±6.9厘米;体重:67.7±8.3千克)在三种不同条件下各进行两次30米冲刺:常规冲刺、阻力冲刺和助力冲刺。Alex7设备在冲刺过程中提供助力和阻力。结果与Witty计时门的结果进行比较。使用OptoJump系统测量地面接触时间、腾空时间、步长和步频。使用单测量的双向混合组内相关系数(ICC)、平均标准误差(SEM)和变异系数(CV)评估可靠性。Pearson相关系数确定Alex7与Witty计时系统之间的关联。标准参照效度基于平均差异和CV。使用Bland-Altman分析通过一致性界限确定系统偏差。
在助力和阻力跑步条件下,使用Alex7设备获得的跑步时间在各测试之间表现出良好到优秀的重测可靠性(ICC,0.83 - 0.94),并且Alex7与Witty系统之间表现出良好到优秀的相关性(Pearson相关系数 = 0.88 - 0.98)。然而,Alex7设备始终产生比Witty设备更长的跑步时间(差异高达0.16秒,<0.001)。不同的跑步条件在运动学变量上产生了显著差异,如步长、地面接触时间和跑步速度(所有均<0.001),但对腾空时间和跑步步频的影响较小。
Alex7设备在为年轻足球运动员创造阻力和助力跑步条件方面显示出高可靠性。然而,它往往高估跑步时间,在评估时间参数时需要谨慎。