Cakici Fatih, Cakici Elif Bahar
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey.
Oral Dis. 2024 Nov;30(8):5445-5460. doi: 10.1111/odi.15099. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
This meta-analysis aimed to compare the antibacterial efficacy of chitosan/chitosan nanoparticles (Ch/Ch-NPs) versus sodium hypochlorite/chlorhexidine (NaOCl/CHX).
A search was performed in four electronic databases until December 08, 2023. Studies with missing, unclear, and insufficient data sets were excluded. The included studies were assessed by two independent reviewers using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Quasi-Experimental Studies. The meta-analysis of standardized mean difference was performed using a random effects model. Additionally, funnel plots as well as Egger's regression intercept test were used to evaluate potential publication bias.
A total of 426 samples were used in nine included studies. There was no difference in antibacterial efficacy between Ch/Ch-NPs-NaOCl (SMD: 0.005; 95% CI: -0.844-0.854; p = 0.990). However, the antibacterial efficacy of NaOCl was statistically more effective than Ch/Ch-NPs (SMD: 0.807; 95% CI: 0.015-1.599; p = 0.046) using the bacterial culture method, and Ch/Ch-NPs was statistically higher than NaOCl (SMD: -1.827; 95% CI: -2.720, -0.934; p < 0.000) using confocal laser scanning microscopy.
Ch/Ch-NPs may be an alternative to NaOCl against Enterococcus faecalis. The methods used in the in vitro studies evaluating the antibacterial efficacy of irrigation solutions against E. faecalis may have had an impact on the results.
本荟萃分析旨在比较壳聚糖/壳聚糖纳米颗粒(Ch/Ch-NPs)与次氯酸钠/氯己定(NaOCl/CHX)的抗菌效果。
在四个电子数据库中进行检索,直至2023年12月8日。排除数据缺失、不明确和不充分的研究。纳入的研究由两名独立 reviewers 使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所类实验研究关键评估清单进行评估。使用随机效应模型进行标准化均值差的荟萃分析。此外,使用漏斗图以及埃格回归截距检验来评估潜在的发表偏倚。
九项纳入研究共使用了426个样本。Ch/Ch-NPs与NaOCl之间的抗菌效果无差异(标准化均值差:0.005;95%置信区间:-0.844至0.854;p = 0.990)。然而,使用细菌培养方法时,NaOCl的抗菌效果在统计学上比Ch/Ch-NPs更有效(标准化均值差:0.807;95%置信区间:0.015至1.599;p = 0.046),而使用共聚焦激光扫描显微镜时,Ch/Ch-NPs在统计学上高于NaOCl(标准化均值差:-1.827;95%置信区间:-2.720,-0.934;p < 0.000)。
Ch/Ch-NPs可能是对抗粪肠球菌的NaOCl替代品。评估冲洗液对粪肠球菌抗菌效果的体外研究中所使用的方法可能对结果产生了影响。