• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别癌症护理总体评分的驱动因素:来自瑞士癌症患者体验研究第二波的见解。

Identifying the drivers of overall rating of cancer care: Insights from the second wave of the Swiss Cancer Patient Experiences study.

机构信息

Unisanté, Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Cancer. 2024 Dec 15;130(24):4334-4346. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35506. Epub 2024 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.35506
PMID:39119752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11585347/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient experience surveys gather information on various aspects of care via numerous survey items. Identifying the most critical areas of patient experience to prioritize for quality care improvement can be challenging. The objective of this study was to determine which care experience items are the drivers influencing patients' overall rating of cancer care.

METHODS

Data from 2750 adult patients with cancer from the second wave of the Swiss Cancer Patient Experiences study were analyzed. This cross-sectional survey was conducted in eight Swiss hospitals from September 2021 to February 2022. Stepwise logistic regression examined the relationship between overall care rating and 29 patient experience items covering different patient-centered care dimensions while adjusting for sociodemographic and health variables.

RESULTS

Overall, patients rated their cancer care experience at 8.9 out of 10. Stepwise regression identified seven drivers contributing to overall care rating. The strongest drivers were "professionals worked well together" (odds ratio [OR], 4.81) and "tests were not repeated" (OR, 2.09) from the coordination and integration dimension, "offered support for symptoms during treatment" (OR, 2.11) from the physical comfort dimension, followed by "hospital staff ensured available home support" (OR, 1.99), "offered to see health professional for concerns" (OR, 1.91), "treatment options were explained" (OR, 1.75), and "involved in treatment decisions as desired" (OR, 1.68).

CONCLUSIONS

This study evaluated the care experiences of patients with cancer with a comprehensive tool that identified seven key factors independently associated with overall care rating. By concentrating on these areas, hospitals can not only improve the patient care experience but also efficiently allocate resources to quality improvement initiatives.

摘要

背景

患者体验调查通过大量调查项目收集护理各个方面的信息。确定患者体验中需要优先考虑的关键领域以进行高质量护理改进可能具有挑战性。本研究的目的是确定哪些护理体验项目是影响患者对癌症护理总体评价的驱动因素。

方法

对来自瑞士癌症患者体验研究第二波的 2750 名成年癌症患者的数据进行了分析。这项横断面调查于 2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 2 月在瑞士的八家医院进行。逐步逻辑回归分析了整体护理评分与涵盖不同以患者为中心的护理维度的 29 项患者体验项目之间的关系,同时调整了社会人口学和健康变量。

结果

总体而言,患者对癌症护理体验的评分为 10 分制的 8.9 分。逐步回归确定了对整体护理评分有贡献的七个驱动因素。协作和整合维度中“专业人员配合默契”(优势比 [OR],4.81)和“未重复检查”(OR,2.09)以及物理舒适维度中“在治疗期间提供症状支持”(OR,2.11)是最强的驱动因素,其次是“医院工作人员确保提供家庭支持”(OR,1.99)、“提供与健康专业人员的咨询”(OR,1.91)、“解释治疗方案”(OR,1.75)和“按照患者意愿参与治疗决策”(OR,1.68)。

结论

本研究使用一种全面的工具评估了癌症患者的护理体验,该工具确定了与整体护理评分独立相关的七个关键因素。通过关注这些领域,医院不仅可以改善患者的护理体验,还可以有效地将资源分配到质量改进计划中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efae/11585347/6d7de0e1262e/CNCR-130-4334-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efae/11585347/6d7de0e1262e/CNCR-130-4334-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efae/11585347/6d7de0e1262e/CNCR-130-4334-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying the drivers of overall rating of cancer care: Insights from the second wave of the Swiss Cancer Patient Experiences study.识别癌症护理总体评分的驱动因素:来自瑞士癌症患者体验研究第二波的见解。
Cancer. 2024 Dec 15;130(24):4334-4346. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35506. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
2
Inequalities in patients' experiences with cancer care: the role of economic and health literacy determinants.癌症护理中患者体验的不平等:经济和健康素养决定因素的作用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):733. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11174-x.
3
Socio-demographic and health-related determinants of patients' overall rating and experiences of cancer care.患者对癌症护理的总体评价和体验的社会人口学和健康相关决定因素。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Sep 29;23(1):918. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11445-6.
4
Patients' experiences with cancer care in Switzerland: Results of a multicentre cross-sectional survey.瑞士的癌症护理患者体验:一项多中心横断面调查的结果。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Nov;31(6):e13705. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13705. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
5
Computer-assisted textual analysis of free-text comments in the Swiss Cancer Patient Experiences (SCAPE) survey.瑞士癌症患者体验(SCAPE)调查中自由文本评论的计算机辅助文本分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 10;20(1):1029. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05873-4.
6
Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures?360度反馈调查结果与患者满意度指标有关吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 May;473(5):1590-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3981-3.
7
Determinants of patient satisfaction with cancer care delivered by the Danish healthcare system.丹麦医疗系统提供的癌症护理患者满意度的决定因素。
Cancer. 2017 Aug 1;123(15):2918-2926. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30673. Epub 2017 May 2.
8
Patient satisfaction in otolaryngology: Can academic institutions compete?耳鼻喉科的患者满意度:学术机构能与之竞争吗?
Laryngoscope. 2012 May;122(5):1000-9. doi: 10.1002/lary.23255. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
9
Patient experiences with public hospital care: first benchmark survey in Hong Kong.患者对公立医院服务的体验:香港的首次基准调查。
Hong Kong Med J. 2012 Oct;18(5):371-80.
10
Evaluation of patient experience in county-level public hospitals in China: a multicentred, cross-sectional study.中国县级公立医院患者体验评价:一项多中心、横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 14;9(11):e034225. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034225.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences and Needs of Swiss Cancer Survivors in the Domains of Health-Related Information and the Healthcare System.瑞士癌症幸存者在健康相关信息和医疗保健系统领域的经历与需求。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 15;16(24):4177. doi: 10.3390/cancers16244177.

本文引用的文献

1
Socio-demographic and health-related determinants of patients' overall rating and experiences of cancer care.患者对癌症护理的总体评价和体验的社会人口学和健康相关决定因素。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Sep 29;23(1):918. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11445-6.
2
The Lausanne Hospitality Model: a model integrating hospitality into supportive care.洛桑款待模式:将款待融入支持性护理的模式。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Apr 15;31(5):270. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07726-2.
3
Key Patient Experience Drivers That Result in Exemplary Overall Provider Performance Ratings in the Ambulatory Environment: A Quantitative Study.
在门诊环境中导致提供者总体绩效评级优异的关键患者体验驱动因素:一项定量研究。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2022;45(3):182-190. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0000000000000417.
4
Factors influencing cancer patients' experiences of care in the USA, United Kingdom, and Canada: A systematic review.影响美国、英国和加拿大癌症患者护理体验的因素:一项系统综述。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Apr 21;47:101405. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101405. eCollection 2022 May.
5
Different Associations of Intentional and Non-Intentional Non-Adherence Behaviors with Patient Experience with Healthcare and Patient Beliefs in Medications: A Survey of Patients with Chronic Conditions.故意和非故意不依从行为与患者医疗保健体验及药物治疗信念的不同关联:慢性病患者调查
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Dec 14;14:2439-2450. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S281985. eCollection 2020.
6
Patient Experience Drivers of Overall Satisfaction With Care in Cancer Patients: Evidence From Responders to the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey.癌症患者对医疗总体满意度的患者体验驱动因素:来自英国癌症患者体验调查受访者的证据
J Patient Exp. 2020 Oct;7(5):758-765. doi: 10.1177/2374373519889435. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
7
A Systematic Review of Surveys for Measuring Patient-centered Care in the Hospital Setting.系统评价医院环境中用于测量以患者为中心的医疗服务的调查研究。
Med Care. 2021 Mar 1;59(3):228-237. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001474.
8
Measuring patient perceptions of surgeon communication performance in the treatment of thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer using the communication assessment tool.使用沟通评估工具测量甲状腺结节和甲状腺癌患者对外科医生沟通表现的看法。
Surgery. 2021 Feb;169(2):282-288. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.08.019. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
9
Waiting time, communication quality, and patient satisfaction: An analysis of moderating influences on the relationship between perceived waiting time and the satisfaction of breast cancer patients during their inpatient stay.等待时间、沟通质量和患者满意度:对感知等待时间与住院期间乳腺癌患者满意度之间关系的调节影响分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Apr;103(4):819-825. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.11.018. Epub 2019 Nov 17.
10
Contribution of HCAHPS Specific Care Experiences to Global Ratings Varies Across 7 Countries: What Can be Learned for Reporting These Global Ratings?HCAHPS 特定护理体验对全球评分的贡献因 7 个国家而异:从这些全球评分报告中可以学到什么?
Med Care. 2019 Nov;57(11):e65-e72. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001077.