• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用切除性手术治疗种植体周围炎后的十年随访:一例报告。

Ten-year follow-up after peri-implantitis treatment using resective surgery: A case report.

作者信息

César Neto João Batista, Dos Reis Isabella Neme Ribeiro, Lazarin Rafael Oliveira, Naenni Nadja, Villar Cristina Cunha, Pannuti Claudio Mendes

机构信息

Division of Periodontics, Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Department of Reconstructive Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Clin Adv Periodontics. 2024 Aug 9. doi: 10.1002/cap.10310.

DOI:10.1002/cap.10310
PMID:39119848
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peri-implantitis poses significant challenges in clinical practice, necessitating effective therapeutic strategies. This case report presents a comprehensive treatment approach for managing peri-implantitis, focusing on resective surgery, including implantoplasty and long-term maintenance.

METHODS

We describe the case of a 50-year-old female patient with peri-implantitis affecting a maxillary full-arch implant-supported rehabilitation. The treatment strategy involved resective surgery with implantoplasty, a new maxillary overdenture, and a regular maintenance care schedule of three to four visits per year. Clinical and radiographic assessments were performed over a 10-year follow-up period.

RESULTS

Post-treatment, all maxillary implants demonstrated no probing depths exceeding 4 mm, absence of bleeding on probing or suppuration, minimal plaque accumulation, and no further bone loss. Resective surgery with implantoplasty seems to have effectively provided submucosal decontamination and created a supra-mucosal implant surface conducive to oral hygiene. Despite regular maintenance, some mandibular implants exhibited bone loss during the follow-up period and were managed using the same approach as for the maxillary implants.

CONCLUSIONS

The comprehensive treatment approach yielded favorable long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes, underscoring the effectiveness of the combined strategies in managing peri-implantitis. Nevertheless, the potential for recurrence or the development of peri-implantitis in new implants, even after a decade of successful treatment and strict maintenance, highlights the importance of ongoing, diligent care and regular evaluations to promptly diagnose and address these issues.

KEY POINTS

Why is this case new information? The long-term effectiveness of peri-implantitis treatments, particularly involving implantoplasty, remains under-documented. This case provides insights from a 10-year follow-up on the efficacy of a comprehensive approach for managing peri-implantitis. Furthermore, these findings illustrate the potential for new peri-implantitis to develop, regardless of sustained peri-implant health and rigorous maintenance. This finding highlights the critical role of continuous monitoring for the early diagnosis and treatment of new implants exhibiting peri-implantitis. What are the keys to the successful management of this case? The success of this case hinged on a comprehensive treatment approach that combines surgical intervention associated with implantoplasty to remove implant threads, thereby creating smoother surfaces, less retentive for plaque accumulation. A critical aspect of this approach was also the redesign of prosthetic components to improve hygiene accessibility, continuous monitoring, and consistent maintenance care. What are the primary limitations to success in this case? The primary challenge in achieving success in this case was the prevention of new implants with peri-implantitis, despite the patient's consistent adherence to the maintenance program. Moreover, a critical evaluation of implant characteristics, particularly their susceptibility to mechanical failures, is paramount when performing implantoplasty. Furthermore, aligning patient expectations with the realistic esthetic and functional outcomes of the treatment is often challenging.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Peri-implantitis, an inflammatory disease affecting dental implants, is quite challenging to treat. This case report describes how a 50-year-old woman with this condition was successfully treated and maintained over 10 years. The approach included a surgical method called resective surgery, which involved reshaping the bone defect (osteoplasty) and smoothing the implant surface (implantoplasty). Additionally, she was fitted with a new upper denture and had regular follow-up visits three to four times a year. After ten years, her upper implants were stable with no signs of infection or further bone loss, and they were easy to keep clean. Some of her lower implants did experience inflammation with progressive bone loss during this time, but they were managed using the same surgical procedure as for her upper implants. This 10-year case report highlights positive and stable clinical results after resective surgery for treating peri-implantitis and the importance of an interdisciplinary approach and regular check-ups for maintenance, early diagnosis, and management of peri-implantitis over the long term.

摘要

背景

种植体周围炎在临床实践中带来了重大挑战,需要有效的治疗策略。本病例报告介绍了一种治疗种植体周围炎的综合治疗方法,重点是切除性手术,包括种植体oplasty和长期维护。

方法

我们描述了一名50岁女性患者的病例,该患者患有种植体周围炎,影响上颌全牙弓种植体支持的修复体。治疗策略包括切除性手术联合种植体oplasty、新的上颌覆盖义齿以及每年三到四次的定期维护护理计划。在10年的随访期内进行了临床和影像学评估。

结果

治疗后,所有上颌种植体的探诊深度均未超过4毫米,探诊时无出血或化脓,菌斑积聚极少,且无进一步的骨质流失。切除性手术联合种植体oplasty似乎有效地实现了黏膜下清洁,并创造了有利于口腔卫生的龈上种植体表面。尽管进行了定期维护,但一些下颌种植体在随访期间仍出现骨质流失,并采用与上颌种植体相同的方法进行处理。

结论

综合治疗方法产生了良好的长期临床和影像学结果,强调了联合策略在治疗种植体周围炎中的有效性。然而,即使经过十年的成功治疗和严格维护,新种植体仍有发生种植体周围炎复发或发展的可能性,这凸显了持续、勤勉护理和定期评估以迅速诊断和解决这些问题的重要性。

关键点

为什么这个病例是新信息?种植体周围炎治疗的长期有效性,特别是涉及种植体oplasty的治疗,文献记载仍然不足。本病例提供了对一种治疗种植体周围炎综合方法疗效的10年随访见解。此外,这些发现表明,无论种植体周围健康状况持续良好和维护严格,新的种植体周围炎仍有可能发生。这一发现凸显了持续监测对于早期诊断和治疗出现种植体周围炎的新种植体的关键作用。本病例成功管理的关键是什么?本病例的成功取决于一种综合治疗方法,该方法结合了与种植体oplasty相关的手术干预,以去除种植体螺纹,从而创造更光滑的表面,减少菌斑积聚的滞留。该方法的一个关键方面还包括重新设计修复组件,以改善卫生可达性、持续监测和一致的维护护理。本病例成功的主要限制是什么?在本病例中取得成功的主要挑战是预防新的种植体周围炎,尽管患者始终坚持维护计划。此外,在进行种植体oplasty时,对种植体特征,特别是其对机械故障的易感性进行严格评估至关重要。此外,使患者期望与治疗的实际美学和功能结果相一致往往具有挑战性。

通俗易懂的总结

种植体周围炎是一种影响牙种植体的炎症性疾病,治疗颇具挑战性。本病例报告描述了一名患有这种疾病的50岁女性如何在10年期间成功接受治疗和维护。治疗方法包括一种称为切除性手术的外科方法,该方法涉及重塑骨缺损(骨oplasty)和平滑种植体表面(种植体oplasty)。此外,她佩戴了新的上义齿,并每年进行三到四次定期随访。10年后,她的上颌种植体稳定,没有感染或进一步骨质流失的迹象,并且易于保持清洁。在此期间,她的一些下颌种植体确实出现了炎症并伴有进行性骨质流失,但采用与上颌种植体相同的外科手术进行处理。这份10年的病例报告突出了切除性手术后治疗种植体周围炎的积极稳定临床结果,以及跨学科方法和定期检查对于长期维护、早期诊断和管理种植体周围炎的重要性。

相似文献

1
Ten-year follow-up after peri-implantitis treatment using resective surgery: A case report.采用切除性手术治疗种植体周围炎后的十年随访:一例报告。
Clin Adv Periodontics. 2024 Aug 9. doi: 10.1002/cap.10310.
2
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Resective Surgery with Adjunctive Implantoplasty Over a 6- to 11-Year Follow-up: A Case Series.辅助性植入成形术切除手术 6 至 11 年随访的临床和影像学结果:病例系列。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2024 Jul 26;44(4):466-476. doi: 10.11607/prd.6756.
3
Multidisciplinary Treatment for Peri-Implantitis: A 24-Month Follow-Up Case Report.种植体周围炎的多学科治疗:一份24个月随访病例报告。
Clin Adv Periodontics. 2016 May;6(2):76-82. doi: 10.1902/cap.2015.150035.
4
Two to six-year disease resolution and marginal bone stability rates of a modified resective-implantoplasty therapy in 32 peri-implantitis cases.32 例种植体周围炎经改良切除-种植体再成形治疗后 2 至 6 年的疾病缓解率和边缘骨稳定性。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Aug;21(4):758-765. doi: 10.1111/cid.12773. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
5
Surgical reconstruction of peri-implantitis with adjunctive antimicrobial photodynamic therapy: A case report with 5-year follow-up.采用辅助性抗菌光动力疗法对种植体周围炎进行手术重建:一例5年随访病例报告
Clin Adv Periodontics. 2024 Sep;14(3):185-191. doi: 10.1002/cap.10275. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
6
Surgical approach combining implantoplasty and reconstructive therapy with locally delivered antibiotic in the treatment of peri-implantitis: A prospective clinical case series.种植体周围炎治疗中采用局部抗生素给药的种植体成形术和重建疗法相结合的手术方法:一项前瞻性临床病例系列研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Dec;23(6):864-873. doi: 10.1111/cid.13049. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
7
Peri-implantitis management by resective surgery combined with implantoplasty and Er:YAG laser irradiation, accompanied by free gingival graft: a case report.采用切除性手术联合种植体成形术及铒钇铝石榴石激光照射并辅以游离龈瓣移植术治疗种植体周围炎:1例报告
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2023 Jun 6;14:20406223231174816. doi: 10.1177/20406223231174816. eCollection 2023.
8
Implantoplasty Enhancing Peri-implant Bone Stability Over a 3-Year Follow-up: A Case Series.种植体成形术在3年随访期内增强种植体周围骨稳定性:病例系列研究
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020 Jan/Feb;40(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.11607/prd.3849.
9
Implantoplasty Improves Clinical Parameters over a 2-Year Follow-Up: A Case Series.种植体周围骨增量术在两年随访中改善临床参数:病例系列。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jan 12;58(1):113. doi: 10.3390/medicina58010113.
10
Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis - Consensus report of working group 4.种植体周围炎的外科治疗——第 4 工作组的共识报告。
Int Dent J. 2019 Sep;69 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):18-22. doi: 10.1111/idj.12505.