Post-Graduate Program in Implant Dentistry (PPGO), Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, South Carolina, Brazil.
Department of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Carolinum, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Aug;21(4):758-765. doi: 10.1111/cid.12773. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
Different nonsurgical, antibacterial, surgical, and regenerative approaches to treat peri-implantitis have been proposed, but there is no an actual "gold" standard treatment showing the most favorable results to counteract peri-implantitis effects.
To evaluate radiographically and clinically the disease resolution and peri-implant marginal bone stability rates of peri-implantitis cases treated through a combined resective-implantoplasty therapy in a moderate to long-term period.
Records of patients diagnosed with peri-implantitis and treated through the same protocol applying a combined resective-implantoplasty therapy with minimum 2-year follow-up were screened. Eligible patients were contacted and asked to undergo clinical and radiologic examination. Progressive marginal bone loss, bleeding on probing, suppuration, implant mobility, and implant fracture were considered to establish the disease resolution rate and peri-implant bone stability of the treated implants.
Twenty-three patients with 32 treated implants fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Over the 2 to 6-year follow-up, (mean time: 3.4 ± 1.5 years), the disease resolution rate was 83% (patient level) and 87% (implant level). Four implants (13%) were lost or removed due to continuous MBL and osseointegration failure. At follow-up, peri-implant marginal bone remained stable with no further bone loss in 87% of the treated implants. BOP was absent in 89.3% (implant level), suppuration was resolved in all cases, and no pain or implant fracture was reported.
Implantoplasty treated cases showed high disease resolution rate and peri-implant marginal bone stability. This surgical antibiofilm strategy can counteract peri-implantitis progression providing an adequate environment for implant function and longevity over a moderate to long-term period.
已经提出了不同的非手术、抗菌、手术和再生方法来治疗种植体周围炎,但目前没有一种真正的“黄金”标准治疗方法能够显示出最有利的结果来对抗种植体周围炎的影响。
评估通过联合切除-种植体成形术治疗种植体周围炎病例在中长时期内的疾病缓解和种植体边缘骨稳定性的放射学和临床结果。
筛选了接受过相同方案治疗的种植体周围炎患者的记录,该方案应用联合切除-种植体成形术治疗,至少有 2 年的随访。符合条件的患者被联系并要求接受临床和放射学检查。渐进性边缘骨丧失、探诊出血、化脓、种植体动度和种植体骨折被认为是确定治疗种植体的疾病缓解率和种植体边缘骨稳定性的指标。
23 名患者的 32 个治疗种植体符合纳入标准。在 2 至 6 年的随访期间(平均时间:3.4±1.5 年),疾病缓解率为 83%(患者水平)和 87%(种植体水平)。由于持续的 MBL 和骨整合失败,4 个种植体(13%)丢失或被移除。在随访时,87%的治疗种植体边缘骨保持稳定,没有进一步的骨丧失。89.3%(种植体水平)的探诊出血为阴性,所有病例的化脓均得到解决,没有疼痛或种植体骨折的报告。
种植体成形术治疗病例显示出较高的疾病缓解率和种植体边缘骨稳定性。这种手术抗生物膜策略可以对抗种植体周围炎的进展,为种植体功能和长期使用提供一个适当的环境,在中长时期内。