Hasselbalch Rasmus Bo, Schytz Philip Andreas, Schultz Martin, Sindet-Pedersen Caroline, Kristensen Jonas Henrik, Strandkjær Nina, Knudsen Sophie Sander, Pries-Heje Mia, Pareek Manan, Kragholm Kristian H, Carlson Nicholas, Schou Morten, Andersen Mikkel Porsborg, Bundgaard Henning, Torp-Pedersen Christian, Iversen Kasper Karmark
Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Clin Chem. 2024 Oct 3;70(10):1231-1240. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvae107.
The influence of age on cardiac troponin is unclear and may vary between cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and I (cTnI). We aimed to compare the impact of age on the diagnostic and prognostic utility of cTnT and cTnI.
This Danish nationwide, register-based cohort study included patients with at least one cardiac troponin (cTn) measurement from 2009 through June 2022, stratified into decades of age. We used peak cTn concentration during admission, dichotomized as positive/negative and normalized to the 99th percentile. Receiver operating characteristics for myocardial infarction (MI) and logistic regression were used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) for mortality at 1 year.
We included 541 817 patients; median age 66 years (interquartile range [IQR] 51-77) and 256 545 (47%) female. A total of 40 359 (7.4%) had an MI, and 59 800 (14.1%) patients died within 1 year of admission. The predictive ability of both cTns for MI were highest for patients 30 to 50 years. This was most pronounced for cTnT, the specificity of which fell from 83% among patients 40 to 49 years to 4% for patients ≥90 years. The prognostic ability of both cTns for 1-year mortality declined with age. cTnT had stronger prognostic ability for all age-groups; OR for a positive cTnT 28.4 (95% CI, 20.1-41.0) compared with 9.4 (95% CI, 5.0-16.7) for cTnI among patients <30 years.
The predictive and prognostic ability of cTnT and cTnI declined with age. cTnT had a low specificity for MI in elderly patients. However, cTnT was the strongest prognostic marker among all age groups.
年龄对心肌肌钙蛋白的影响尚不清楚,且心肌肌钙蛋白T(cTnT)和心肌肌钙蛋白I(cTnI)之间的影响可能有所不同。我们旨在比较年龄对cTnT和cTnI诊断及预后效用的影响。
这项基于丹麦全国登记的队列研究纳入了2009年至2022年6月期间至少进行过一次心肌肌钙蛋白(cTn)测量的患者,并按年龄十年分层。我们使用入院期间的cTn峰值浓度,分为阳性/阴性,并标准化至第99百分位数。采用心肌梗死(MI)的受试者操作特征曲线和逻辑回归来估计1年死亡率的比值比(OR)。
我们纳入了541817名患者;中位年龄66岁(四分位间距[IQR]51 - 77),女性256545名(47%)。共有40359名(7.4%)发生MI,59800名(14.1%)患者在入院1年内死亡。两种cTn对MI的预测能力在30至50岁患者中最高。这在cTnT中最为明显,其特异性从40至49岁患者中的83%降至90岁及以上患者中的4%。两种cTn对1年死亡率的预后能力均随年龄下降。cTnT在所有年龄组中具有更强的预后能力;在年龄小于30岁的患者中,cTnT阳性的OR为28.4(95%CI,20.1 - 41.0),而cTnI为9.4(95%CI,5.0 - 16.7)。
cTnT和cTnI的预测及预后能力随年龄下降。cTnT在老年患者中对MI的特异性较低。然而,cTnT是所有年龄组中最强的预后标志物。