Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Eur Heart J. 2011 Jun;32(11):1379-89. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr033. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
To examine the diagnostic accuracy of sensitive cardiac troponin (cTn) assays in elderly patients, since elevated levels with sensitive cTn assays were reported in 20% of elderly patients without acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
In this multi-centre study, we included 1098 consecutive patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of AMI, 406 (37%) were >70 years old. Measurement of three investigational sensitive cTn assays [Roche high-sensitive cTnT (hs-cTnT), Siemens cTnI-Ultra, and Abbott-Architect cTnI) and the standard assay (Roche cTnT) was performed in a blinded fashion. The final diagnosis was adjudicated by two independent cardiologists. Acute myocardial infarction was the adjudicated final diagnosis in 24% of elderly patients. Among elderly patients without AMI, baseline cTn levels were elevated above the 99th percentile in 51% with Roche hs-cTnT, in 17% with Siemens TnI-Ultra, and 13% with Abbott-Architect cTnI. The diagnostic accuracy as quantified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was significantly greater for the sensitive cTn assays compared with the standard assay (AUC for Roche hs-cTnT, 0.94; Siemens cTnI-Ultra, 0.95; and Abbott-Architect cTnI, 0.95 vs. AUC for the standard assay, 0.90; P < 0.05 for comparisons). The best cut-offs for the sensitive cTn-assays determined by the ROC-curve in elderly patients differed clearly from those in younger patients. Furthermore, the prognostic value regarding 90-day mortality varied among the sensitive cTn assays.
Sensitive cTn assays have high diagnostic accuracy also in the elderly. Mild elevations are common in elderly non-AMI patients, therefore the optimal cut-off levels are substantially higher in elderly as compared with younger patients. Furthermore, sensitive cTn assays yielded different prognostic value.
检测高敏心肌肌钙蛋白(cTn)检测在老年患者中的诊断准确性,因为在无急性心肌梗死(AMI)的老年患者中,20%的患者出现高敏 cTn 水平升高。
在这项多中心研究中,我们纳入了 1098 例有 AMI 症状的连续患者,其中 406 例(37%)年龄大于 70 岁。以盲法方式检测三种研究用高敏 cTn 检测法[罗氏高敏 cTnT(hs-cTnT)、西门子 cTnI-Ultra 和雅培-Architect cTnI)和标准检测法(罗氏 cTnT)。通过两位独立的心脏病专家进行最终诊断。24%的老年患者被诊断为急性心肌梗死。在无 AMI 的老年患者中,罗氏 hs-cTnT 检测中 51%的患者、西门子 TnI-Ultra 检测中 17%的患者和雅培-Architect cTnI 检测中 13%的患者的基线 cTn 水平高于第 99 百分位。通过接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)量化的诊断准确性,与标准检测法相比,高敏 cTn 检测显著更高(罗氏 hs-cTnT 的 AUC 为 0.94,西门子 cTnI-Ultra 的 AUC 为 0.95,雅培-Architect cTnI 的 AUC 为 0.95,而标准检测法的 AUC 为 0.90;与比较相比,P < 0.05)。通过 ROC 曲线确定的老年患者高敏 cTn 检测的最佳截断值明显不同于年轻患者。此外,高敏 cTn 检测在 90 天死亡率方面的预后价值也不同。
高敏 cTn 检测在老年患者中也具有很高的诊断准确性。轻度升高在老年非 AMI 患者中很常见,因此与年轻患者相比,老年患者的最佳截断值要高得多。此外,高敏 cTn 检测的预后价值不同。