Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Nov;62(11):517-524. doi: 10.5414/CP204565.
To evaluate the indications and dosing regimens for oral metronidazole monotherapy (OMM) for the management of oral anaerobic infections (OAIs) other than periodontitis.
The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines in literature of PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. Data were retrieved from reports published in English in the period January 1, 1980 - August 30, 2023. Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools were used to assess study risk of bias.
A total of 228 articles were retrieved from the databases of which 16 met the inclusion criteria necessary for achieving the aims of the study. OAIs in which OMM was used or recommended included pericoronitis; necrotizing ulcerative gingivitis/periodontitis/stomatitis, osteomyelitis, acute periapical infection, and cellulitis. OMM was prescribed in dosages ranging from 200 to 500 mg t.i.d. for periods ranging from 2 to 7 days. Osteomyelitis of the jaw was the only infection for which the dosage regimen of metronidazole was not clearly described.
Evidence from the databases searched support the view that OMM has clinical efficacy in the treatment of specific OAIs namely pericoronitis and necrotizing oral infections in immune-competent and immune-compromised patients. The evidence does not support the use of OMM in "deep tissue" infections such as osteomyelitis, and odontogenic infections such as acute apical infection and cellulitis. Clinical trials are warranted to determine the efficacy of OMM in comparison with other antibiotic regimens.
评估口服甲硝唑单药治疗(OMM)用于治疗牙周炎以外的口腔厌氧感染(OAIs)的适应证和剂量方案。
本研究遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,检索了 PubMed/Medline、Scopus 和 Cochrane 数据库中发表的英文文献。数据检索时间为 1980 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 8 月 30 日。采用 Joanna Briggs 研究所批判性评估工具评估研究的偏倚风险。
从数据库中检索到 228 篇文章,其中 16 篇符合研究目的的纳入标准。使用或推荐 OMM 的 OAIs 包括冠周炎、坏死性溃疡性牙龈炎/牙周炎/口炎、骨髓炎、急性根尖周感染和蜂窝织炎。OMM 的剂量范围为 200-500mg,每日 3 次,治疗时间为 2-7 天。颌骨骨髓炎是唯一一种甲硝唑剂量方案未明确描述的感染。
从检索的数据库中获得的证据支持这样一种观点,即 OMM 在治疗特定的 OAIs,即免疫功能正常和免疫功能低下患者的冠周炎和坏死性口腔感染方面具有临床疗效。证据不支持将 OMM 用于“深部组织”感染,如骨髓炎,以及牙源性感染,如急性根尖周感染和蜂窝织炎。有必要进行临床试验,以确定 OMM 与其他抗生素治疗方案相比的疗效。