Tighe Caitlan A, Phares Angela, Weiner Debra K, Beehler Gregory P, VanSwearingen Jessie, Harvey Allison G, Hilgeman Michelle M, Buysse Daniel J, Forman Daniel E
VISN 4 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Department of Psychology, Providence College, Providence, RI, USA.
Behav Sleep Med. 2024 Nov-Dec;22(6):894-909. doi: 10.1080/15402002.2024.2386602. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
Study objectives were to: 1) iteratively adapt the Transdiagnostic Sleep and Circadian Intervention (TranS-C) for patients in cardiac rehabilitation (CR; Phase 1) and 2) conduct a preliminary single group pre-post intervention test to a) evaluate procedural feasibility and intervention acceptability and b) to explore preliminary pre-post changes in self-reported sleep, disability, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL; Phase 2).
In Phase 1, 12 individuals in CR and six content experts completed interviews to inform TranS-C adaptations. Interviews were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis. In Phase 2, eight individuals in CR completed a baseline assessment, the adapted TranS-C intervention, and a post-intervention assessment. Intervention acceptability was assessed via questionnaire and interview. Sleep, disability, and HRQoL outcomes were assessed using questionnaires. Descriptive statistics were calculated for quantitative measures; interviews were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis.
Phase 1 participants were receptive to the premise and structure of the adapted intervention. In Phase 2, participants endorsed positive attitudes toward the intervention. Seven of eight participants demonstrated improvements in sleep outcomes. Disability and HRQoL results did not consistently improve.
The adapted TranS-C intervention was acceptable to CR patients and could yield improvements in subjective sleep outcomes. Larger-scale testing in CR is warranted.
研究目的如下:1)对心脏康复(CR;第1阶段)患者反复调整跨诊断睡眠与昼夜节律干预措施(TranS-C);2)进行初步的单组干预前后测试,以a)评估程序可行性和干预可接受性,以及b)探索自我报告的睡眠、残疾和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL;第2阶段)的初步干预前后变化。
在第1阶段,12名CR患者和6名内容专家完成了访谈,以为TranS-C的调整提供信息。采用快速定性分析对访谈进行分析。在第2阶段,8名CR患者完成了基线评估、调整后的TranS-C干预以及干预后评估。通过问卷和访谈评估干预可接受性。使用问卷评估睡眠、残疾和HRQoL结果。对定量指标计算描述性统计量;采用快速定性分析对访谈进行分析。
第1阶段的参与者接受了调整后干预措施的前提和结构。在第2阶段,参与者对干预措施持积极态度。8名参与者中有7名的睡眠结果有所改善。残疾和HRQoL结果并未持续改善。
调整后的TranS-C干预措施对CR患者是可接受的,并且可以改善主观睡眠结果。有必要在CR中进行更大规模的测试。