• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究 FG-COMPASS 运动技能量表中两种基本运动技能的专家评定者间和评定者内/内评定者间的信度。

Investigating Expert-Rater Agreement and Inter/Intra-Rater Reliability of Two Fundamental Movement Skills for the Locomotor Subscale of the FG-COMPASS.

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology, California State University, Northridge, CA, USA.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 2024 Oct;131(5):1571-1583. doi: 10.1177/00315125241272720. Epub 2024 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1177/00315125241272720
PMID:39120571
Abstract

The Furtado-Gallagher Children Observational Movement Pattern Assessment System (FG-COMPASS) is an observational tool using sequential decisions to assess fundamental movement skill proficiency. The current version of the test has three locomotor and five manipulative skills. Adding two more locomotor skills to the assessment tool enriches its scope, enabling a more comprehensive and nuanced evaluation of individual movement skills. We assessed expert-non-expert rater agreement and inter/intra non-expert rater reliability of two new scales for the locomotor subscale. We divided this study into two parts. In Part I, we filmed 60 children aged 5-10 years old who performed gallop and vertical jump skills. A motor behavior expert then classified the videotapes using our newly created rating scales. Next, we selected eight videos for training purposes and 24 videos for testing purposes. In Part II, 30 undergraduate students underwent rater training. Rating data were analyzed using weighted kappa (Kw) and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), and these indices showed 'very good' agreement between the expert and the non-expert raters for vertical jump (Kw = .96) and gallop (Kw = .89). The ICC expert to non-expert rater values for vertical jump and gallop were .98 and .94, respectively; and mean kappa values for inter-rater reliability between non-experts were considered 'very good' for vertical jump (MKw = .92) and 'good' for gallop (MKw = .78). The ICC inter-rater values were .98 and .95 (considered 'excellent') for vertical jump and gallop, respectively; and the kappa intra-rater values were .96 and .85, respectively, with intra-rater ICC values .98 and .92. Thus, the proposed rating scales were reliable for assessing vertical jump and gallop. Future studies should focus on criterion-related validity and reliability evidence from live performances.

摘要

富尔达-加拉格尔儿童观察运动模式评估系统(FG-COMPASS)是一种使用顺序决策评估基本运动技能熟练程度的观察工具。目前的测试版本有三个移动技能和五个操作技能。在评估工具中增加两个移动技能可以丰富其范围,从而更全面和细致地评估个体运动技能。我们评估了两位新的运动技能量表的专家-非专家评分者之间的一致性和非专家内部/外部评分者之间的可靠性。我们将这项研究分为两部分。在第一部分中,我们拍摄了 60 名 5-10 岁的儿童进行奔跑和垂直跳跃技能。一位运动行为专家随后使用我们新创建的评分量表对录像带进行分类。接下来,我们选择了 8 个视频用于培训目的,24 个视频用于测试目的。在第二部分中,30 名本科生接受了评分者培训。使用加权 kappa(Kw)和组内相关系数(ICC)对评分数据进行了分析,这些指标显示专家和非专家评分者在垂直跳跃(Kw =.96)和奔跑(Kw =.89)方面的一致性非常好。垂直跳跃和奔跑的专家与非专家评分者的 ICC 值分别为.98 和.94;非专家之间的平均 Kappa 值(MKw)被认为是垂直跳跃(MKw =.92)和奔跑(MKw =.78)的“非常好”。垂直跳跃和奔跑的 ICC 评分者之间的值分别为.98 和.95(被认为是“优秀”);Kappa 评分者内值分别为.96 和.85,评分者内 ICC 值分别为.98 和.92。因此,提出的评分量表在评估垂直跳跃和奔跑方面是可靠的。未来的研究应侧重于现场表演的效标关联效度和可靠性证据。

相似文献

1
Investigating Expert-Rater Agreement and Inter/Intra-Rater Reliability of Two Fundamental Movement Skills for the Locomotor Subscale of the FG-COMPASS.研究 FG-COMPASS 运动技能量表中两种基本运动技能的专家评定者间和评定者内/内评定者间的信度。
Percept Mot Skills. 2024 Oct;131(5):1571-1583. doi: 10.1177/00315125241272720. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
2
Expert-Rater Agreement and Inter-/Intrarater Reliability for the Furtado-Gallagher Computerized Observational Movement Pattern Assessment System.
Percept Mot Skills. 2018 Jun;125(3):423-437. doi: 10.1177/0031512518769205. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
3
Intra-Rater (Live vs. Video Assessment) and Inter-Rater (Expert vs. Novice) Reliability of the Test of Gross Motor Development-Third Edition.《运动发育测试第三版》的观察者内信度(现场评估与视频评估)和观察者间信度(专家与新手评估)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 9;18(4):1652. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041652.
4
INTER AND INTRA-RATER RELIABILITY OF THE DROP VERTICAL JUMP (DVJ) ASSESSMENT.纵跳下降(DVJ)评估的评分者间信度和评分者内信度
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Oct;15(5):770-775. doi: 10.26603/ijspt20200770.
5
The reliability of classification decisions for the Furtado-Gallagher Computerized Observational Movement Pattern Assessment System--FG-COMPASS.福塔多-加拉格尔计算机化观测运动模式评估系统(FG-COMPASS)分类决策的可靠性。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2012 Sep;83(3):383-90. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2012.10599872.
6
The Rett Syndrome Gross Motor Scale - Dutch Version (RSGMS-NL) Can Reliably Assess Gross Motor Skills in Dutch Individuals with Rett Syndrome.Rett 综合征粗大运动量表-荷兰语版(RSGMS-NL)可可靠评估荷兰 Rett 综合征个体的粗大运动技能。
Dev Neurorehabil. 2022 Feb;25(2):133-139. doi: 10.1080/17518423.2021.1960920. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
7
A modified Vancouver Scar Scale linked with TBSA (mVSS-TBSA): Inter-rater reliability of an innovative burn scar assessment method.改良温哥华瘢痕量表结合体表面积(mVSS-TBSA):一种创新烧伤瘢痕评估方法的组内信度。
Burns. 2013 Sep;39(6):1142-9. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.01.014. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
8
Scoring reading parameters: An inter-rater reliability study using the MNREAD chart.评分阅读参数:使用 MNREAD 图表的观察者间信度研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 7;14(6):e0216775. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216775. eCollection 2019.
9
The inter and intra rater reliability of the Netball Movement Screening Tool.无挡板篮球运动筛查工具的评分者间信度和评分者内信度。
J Sci Med Sport. 2015 May;18(3):353-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.05.008. Epub 2014 May 23.
10
A cross-validation study of the TGMD-2: The case of an adolescent population.《TGMD -2的交叉验证研究:以青少年群体为例》
J Sci Med Sport. 2017 May;20(5):475-479. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.09.013. Epub 2016 Oct 8.