25 年的进展——从 JMIR 出版物中汲取的经验教训,以解决数字健康著作中的性别均等问题:文献计量分析。
Twenty-Five Years of Progress-Lessons Learned From JMIR Publications to Address Gender Parity in Digital Health Authorships: Bibliometric Analysis.
机构信息
Institute of Clinical Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
出版信息
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 9;26:e58950. doi: 10.2196/58950.
BACKGROUND
Digital health research plays a vital role in advancing equitable health care. The diversity of research teams is thereby instrumental in capturing societal challenges, increasing productivity, and reducing bias in algorithms. Despite its importance, the gender distribution within digital health authorship remains largely unexplored.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to investigate the gender distribution among first and last authors in digital health research, thereby identifying predicting factors of female authorship.
METHODS
This bibliometric analysis examined the gender distribution across 59,980 publications from 1999 to 2023, spanning 42 digital health journals indexed in the Web of Science. To identify strategies ensuring equality in research, a detailed comparison of gender representation in JMIR journals was conducted within the field, as well as against a matched sample. Two-tailed Welch 2-sample t tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, and chi-square tests were used to assess differences. In addition, odds ratios were calculated to identify predictors of female authorship.
RESULTS
The analysis revealed that 37% of first authors and 30% of last authors in digital health were female. JMIR journals demonstrated a higher representation, with 49% of first authors and 38% of last authors being female, yielding odds ratios of 1.96 (95% CI 1.90-2.03; P<.001) and 1.78 (95% CI 1.71-1.84; P<.001), respectively. Since 2008, JMIR journals have consistently featured a greater proportion of female first authors than male counterparts. Other factors that predicted female authorship included having female authors in other relevant positions and gender discordance, given the higher rate of male last authors in the field.
CONCLUSIONS
There was an evident shift toward gender parity across publications in digital health, particularly from the publisher JMIR Publications. The specialized focus of its sister journals, equitable editorial policies, and transparency in the review process might contribute to these achievements. Further research is imperative to establish causality, enabling the replication of these successful strategies across other scientific fields to bridge the gender gap in digital health effectively.
背景
数字健康研究在推动公平医疗保健方面发挥着至关重要的作用。因此,研究团队的多样性对于捕捉社会挑战、提高生产力和减少算法中的偏见至关重要。尽管其重要性不言而喻,但数字健康作者群体中的性别分布在很大程度上仍未得到探索。
目的
本研究旨在调查数字健康研究中第一作者和最后作者的性别分布,从而确定女性作者的预测因素。
方法
本文献计量分析考察了 1999 年至 2023 年间来自 42 种数字健康期刊(Web of Science 索引)的 59980 篇出版物的性别分布。为了确定确保研究平等的策略,对该领域内 JMIR 期刊的性别代表性进行了详细比较,并与匹配样本进行了比较。使用双尾 Welch 2 样本 t 检验、Wilcoxon 秩和检验和卡方检验来评估差异。此外,还计算了优势比以确定女性作者的预测因素。
结果
分析结果显示,数字健康领域的第一作者中 37%为女性,最后作者中 30%为女性。JMIR 期刊的代表性更高,其中第一作者中有 49%为女性,最后作者中有 38%为女性,优势比分别为 1.96(95%置信区间 1.90-2.03;P<.001)和 1.78(95%置信区间 1.71-1.84;P<.001)。自 2008 年以来,JMIR 期刊一直以高于男性同行的比例拥有更多的女性第一作者。其他预测女性作者的因素包括其他相关职位中有女性作者以及性别不一致,因为该领域的最后作者中男性比例较高。
结论
数字健康出版物中的性别均等程度明显提高,特别是来自 JMIR 出版公司的出版物。其姊妹期刊的专业重点、公平的编辑政策以及评审过程的透明度可能促成了这些成就。需要进一步研究以确定因果关系,以便在其他科学领域复制这些成功策略,从而有效地弥合数字健康领域的性别差距。