Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Dental Research Center, Student Research Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 9;24(1):922. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04674-z.
Accurate assessment of the bone supporting the implant is crucial. Early detection of bone defects around the implant can prevent the loss of bone support that ultimately leads to the loss of the implant. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to check the accuracy of CBCT in detecting peri-implant fenestrations around the implant.
MATERIALS & METHODS: In this laboratory study, healthy beef ribs were used. The ribs were divided into three groups of 12 (control group, 1-2 mm fenestration group, and 2-3 mm fenestration group). The blocks were cut to a length of 20 mm and 36 osteotomies with dimensions of 4 × 12 mm were made by the periodontist in order to place the implant in these bone blocks. Then the titanium implant was placed in the holes and the initial scan was performed with CBCT. In the second group, fenestration-like lesions were created on the same buccal side at a distance of 10 mm from the crest with a diameter of 1-2 mm and in the third group with a diameter of 2-3 mm, and the CBCT scan was performed again with the same parameters. Two radiologists evaluated the images twice for the presence and absence of fenestration.
There was no statistically significant difference between direct measurements and CBCT in the fenestration group of 1-2 mm (p < 0.05), but there was a significant difference between direct measurements and CBCT in the fenestration group of 2-3 mm and underestimation was observed in CBCT measurements.
The findings of this study showed that CBCT radiography has a higher accuracy in measuring the fenestration around the implant with a smaller diameter and has an acceptable diagnostic value in detecting bone loss around the implant.
准确评估种植体周围的骨质非常重要。早期发现种植体周围的骨缺损可以防止骨质支持的丧失,最终导致种植体的丧失。因此,本研究的目的是检查 CBCT 检测种植体周围骨窗的准确性。
在这项实验室研究中,使用了健康的牛肋骨。将肋骨分为三组,每组 12 根(对照组、1-2mm 开窗组和 2-3mm 开窗组)。将这些骨块切成 20mm 长,由牙周医生制作 36 个尺寸为 4×12mm 的骨切开术,以便将种植体放置在这些骨块中。然后将钛种植体放置在孔中,并使用 CBCT 进行初始扫描。在第二组中,在距离牙槽嵴 10mm 的同一颊侧创建类似于开窗的病变,直径为 1-2mm,在第三组中,直径为 2-3mm,然后使用相同的参数再次进行 CBCT 扫描。两位放射科医生两次评估图像中是否存在开窗。
在 1-2mm 开窗组中,直接测量值与 CBCT 之间无统计学差异(p<0.05),但在 2-3mm 开窗组中,直接测量值与 CBCT 之间存在显著差异,并且 CBCT 测量值存在低估。
本研究结果表明,CBCT 射线照相术在测量较小直径的种植体周围开窗方面具有更高的准确性,并且在检测种植体周围的骨丢失方面具有可接受的诊断价值。