Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, UNED, C/ Juan del Rosal, 10, Madrid, 28040, Spain.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 9;24(1):2165. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19704-2.
Occupational stress is a serious problem in veterinary medicine; however, validated instruments to measure this problem are lacking. The aim of the current study was to address this literature gap by designing and validating a questionnaire and establishing the cut-off points for identifying veterinarians with high and low levels of stress.
The study involved two sub-studies with two Spanish samples. The first study (N = 30 veterinarians; 66.7% women; 63.33% from small animal clinics) investigated the factors related to the work environment that caused the most stress; the results were analyzed using thematic content analysis. The second study (N = 1082; 70.8% women; 71.4% from small animal clinics) involved designing and validating a questionnaire to measure sources of stress in veterinary medicine, as well as establishing the cut-off points for interpreting the results using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis.
The first study showed the main sources of stress and allowed items to be defined for the questionnaire. The second study validated the Sources of Stress in Veterinarian Medicine (SOS-VetMed) questionnaire and confirmed five sources of stress with adequate reliability and validity indices: "work overload," "work-family conflict," "emotional burden of work," "organizational factors," and "emergency problems." Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses verified a structure of five factors (Cronbach's alpha values ranging between 0.92 and 0.69). The five subscales of the SOS-VetMed questionnaire were positively correlated with two indicators of distress: "psychological complaints" and "psychosomatic complaints." The cut-off points indicated that 45.83% and 19.95% of the veterinarians surveyed had high and low levels of stress, respectively.
The results confirmed that the SOS-VetMed questionnaire could be used to determine the stress levels of veterinarians and to design intervention programs to improve their workplace health.
职业压力是兽医领域的一个严重问题;然而,缺乏有效的工具来衡量这一问题。本研究旨在通过设计和验证一种问卷,并确定识别压力水平高和低的兽医的临界点来填补这一文献空白。
本研究包括两项使用两个西班牙样本的子研究。第一项研究(N=30 名兽医;66.7%为女性;63.33%来自小动物诊所)调查了导致工作环境压力最大的因素;使用主题内容分析对结果进行分析。第二项研究(N=1082;70.8%为女性;71.4%来自小动物诊所)涉及设计和验证一种测量兽医压力源的问卷,并使用接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定解释结果的临界点。
第一项研究显示了压力的主要来源,并为问卷确定了项目。第二项研究验证了兽医压力源量表(SOS-VetMed),并确认了五个具有足够可靠性和有效性指数的压力源:“工作负荷过重”、“工作-家庭冲突”、“工作的情绪负担”、“组织因素”和“紧急问题”。探索性和验证性因素分析验证了一个五因素结构(Cronbach's alpha 值在 0.92 到 0.69 之间)。SOS-VetMed 问卷的五个子量表与两个痛苦指标呈正相关:“心理投诉”和“身心投诉”。临界点表明,接受调查的兽医中 45.83%和 19.95%分别处于高压力和低压力水平。
结果证实,SOS-VetMed 问卷可用于确定兽医的压力水平,并设计干预计划以改善其工作场所健康。