• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

辅助拉考沙胺治疗 1 月龄至≤4 岁儿童局灶性癫痫发作的疗效、安全性和耐受性:一项真实世界研究。

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive Lacosamide therapy for focal seizures in young children aged ≥1 month to ≤4 years: A real-world study.

机构信息

Department of Neurology Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation base of Child development and Critical Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Child Neurodevelopment and Cognitive Disorders, Big Data Engineering Center, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Interdisciplinary Research and Application for Data Science, BNU-HKBU United International College, Zhuhai, China.

出版信息

CNS Neurosci Ther. 2024 Aug;30(8):e14917. doi: 10.1111/cns.14917.

DOI:10.1111/cns.14917
PMID:39123302
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11315674/
Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive lacosamide therapy against focal seizures in young children (1 month - 4 years).

METHODS

This non-randomized, open-label, and self-controlled real-world study included 105 children (1 month-4 years) with focal seizures treated with adjunctive lacosamide therapy at Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University.

RESULTS

(1) The 50% response rates at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of follow-up were 58.1%, 61.0%, 57.1%, and 56.2%, while the seizure-free rates were 27.6%, 34.3%, 32.4%, and 37.1%, respectively. The 50% response rate of the first addition of lacosamide for focal seizures was much higher than the second and later added treatment at 3 months (p = 0.038). After 1 year of follow-up, these children showed an improvement in neurodevelopmental levels (p < 0.05). (2) Lacosamide retention rate was 72.7% (64/88) after 1 year of follow-up. Lack of efficacy and serious adverse events were independent risk factors for the lacosamide retention rate. (3) During adjunctive lacosamide therapy, 13 (12.4%) patients reported adverse events and five (4.7%) patients withdrew due to adverse events, including vomiting drowsiness, ataxia (0.94%), neck itching with eczema (0.94%), irritability (1.88%), and gastrointestinal discomfort (0.94%).

CONCLUSION

Adjunctive lacosamide therapy was effective, safe, and well-tolerated in young Chinese children with focal seizures in this study.

摘要

目的

评估拉科酰胺辅助治疗小儿局灶性发作(1 个月至 4 岁)的疗效、安全性和耐受性。

方法

本项非随机、开放标签、自身对照的真实世界研究纳入了 105 例在重庆医科大学附属儿童医院接受拉科酰胺辅助治疗的局灶性发作患儿(1 个月至 4 岁)。

结果

(1)随访 3、6、9 和 12 个月时,50%反应率分别为 58.1%、61.0%、57.1%和 56.2%,而无发作率分别为 27.6%、34.3%、32.4%和 37.1%。拉科酰胺首次添加治疗局灶性发作的 50%反应率在 3 个月时明显高于第二次及以后添加治疗(p=0.038)。随访 1 年后,这些儿童的神经发育水平有所改善(p<0.05)。(2)随访 1 年后,拉科酰胺保留率为 72.7%(64/88)。疗效不佳和严重不良事件是拉科酰胺保留率的独立危险因素。(3)在拉科酰胺辅助治疗期间,13 例(12.4%)患者报告发生不良事件,5 例(4.7%)患者因不良事件(包括呕吐、嗜睡、共济失调[0.94%]、颈部瘙痒伴湿疹[0.94%]、烦躁[1.88%]和胃肠道不适[0.94%])停药。

结论

在本研究中,拉科酰胺辅助治疗中国小儿局灶性发作有效、安全且耐受良好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/237a/11315674/55f95f85c39b/CNS-30-e14917-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/237a/11315674/f0020b5cfc5b/CNS-30-e14917-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/237a/11315674/55f95f85c39b/CNS-30-e14917-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/237a/11315674/f0020b5cfc5b/CNS-30-e14917-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/237a/11315674/55f95f85c39b/CNS-30-e14917-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive Lacosamide therapy for focal seizures in young children aged ≥1 month to ≤4 years: A real-world study.辅助拉考沙胺治疗 1 月龄至≤4 岁儿童局灶性癫痫发作的疗效、安全性和耐受性:一项真实世界研究。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2024 Aug;30(8):e14917. doi: 10.1111/cns.14917.
2
Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.拉莫三嗪与卡马西平单药治疗癫痫的疗效比较:个体参与者数据回顾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 28;6(6):CD001031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001031.pub4.
3
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.抗癫痫药物单药治疗癫痫:一项个体参与者数据的网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 1;4(4):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub4.
4
Levetiracetam add-on for drug-resistant focal epilepsy: an updated Cochrane Review.左乙拉西坦添加治疗耐药性局灶性癫痫:Cochrane系统评价的更新版
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD001901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001901.pub2.
5
Third-Generation Antiseizure Medications for Adjunctive Treatment of Focal-Onset Seizures in Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.第三代抗癫痫药物辅助治疗成人局灶性发作:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Drugs. 2022 Feb;82(2):199-218. doi: 10.1007/s40265-021-01661-4. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
6
Lacosamide add-on therapy for partial epilepsy.拉科酰胺添加疗法用于部分性癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 16(6):CD008841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008841.pub2.
7
Clinical effectiveness, tolerability and cost-effectiveness of newer drugs for epilepsy in adults: a systematic review and economic evaluation.成人癫痫新药的临床疗效、耐受性及成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(15):1-157, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9150.
8
Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.拉莫三嗪与卡马西平单药治疗癫痫的疗效比较:个体参与者数据回顾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 14;11(11):CD001031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001031.pub3.
9
Lamotrigine add-on for drug-resistant partial epilepsy.拉莫三嗪添加治疗耐药性部分性癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 22;2016(6):CD001909. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001909.pub2.
10
Topiramate versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.托吡酯与卡马西平单药治疗癫痫的疗效比较:个体参与者数据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 6;12(12):CD012065. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012065.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Application of the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination in the developmental follow-up of high-risk infants.汉密尔顿婴儿神经检查在高危婴儿发育随访中的应用。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2024 Sep;66(9):1181-1189. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.15855. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
2
A real-world comparison among third-generation antiseizure medications: Results from the COMPARE study.第三代抗癫痫药物的真实世界比较:COMPARE研究结果
Epilepsia. 2024 Feb;65(2):456-472. doi: 10.1111/epi.17843. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
3
MDMA-assisted therapy for moderate to severe PTSD: a randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.
MDMA 辅助治疗中重度 PTSD:一项随机、安慰剂对照的 3 期试验。
Nat Med. 2023 Oct;29(10):2473-2480. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02565-4. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
4
Effectiveness and safety of Lacosamide therapy for children with focal epilepsy: a real world study.拉科酰胺治疗儿童局灶性癫痫的有效性和安全性:一项真实世界研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Aug 9;14:1186768. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1186768. eCollection 2023.
5
Therapeutic drug monitoring of lacosamide among children: is it helpful?儿童拉科酰胺的治疗药物监测:有帮助吗?
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jul 6;14:1164902. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1164902. eCollection 2023.
6
Drug resistance in epilepsy.癫痫的耐药性。
Lancet Neurol. 2023 Aug;22(8):723-734. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00151-5. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
7
Open-label study to investigate the safety and efficacy of adjunctive perampanel in pediatric patients (aged 4 to <12 years) with inadequately controlled focal-onset seizures: Japanese subgroup analysis.开放性研究调查附加性吡仑帕奈在未充分控制局灶性发作性癫痫发作的儿科患者(4 岁至<12 岁)中的安全性和有效性:日本亚组分析。
Seizure. 2023 Aug;110:109-116. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2023.06.004. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
8
Efficacy of Lacosamide Add-on Therapy on Refractory Focal Epilepsies in Children and Adolescents: An Open-Label Clinical Trial.拉科酰胺辅助治疗儿童和青少年难治性局灶性癫痫的疗效:一项开放标签临床试验。
J Res Pharm Pract. 2023 Mar 24;11(3):109-115. doi: 10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_86_21. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep.
9
Long-term effectiveness and safety of lacosamide as adjunctive therapy in children and adolescents with refractory epilepsy: a real-world study.拉考沙胺作为附加治疗在儿童和青少年耐药性癫痫中的长期有效性和安全性:真实世界研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2023 May 20;23(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04039-5.
10
Adherence to and persistence with lacosamide, perampanel, lamotrigine, and levetiracetam in adult patients with focal epilepsy in Japan: A descriptive cohort study using a claims database.日本成年局灶性癫痫患者对拉科酰胺、吡仑帕奈、拉莫三嗪和左乙拉西坦的依从性和持续性:一项使用索赔数据库的描述性队列研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Mar 29;9(4):e15017. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15017. eCollection 2023 Apr.