Suppr超能文献

以红曲和小曲为发酵剂的米酒酿造过程中微生物群落、生物胺和挥发性成分的比较研究

A Comparative Study of Microbial Communities, Biogenic Amines, and Volatile Profiles in the Brewing Process of Rice Wines with Hongqu and Xiaoqu as Fermentation Starters.

作者信息

Yan Yingyin, Liang Zihua, Huo Yujia, Wu Qi, Ni Li, Lv Xucong

机构信息

Food Nutrition and Health Research Center, School of Advanced Manufacturing, Fuzhou University, Jinjiang 362200, China.

Institute of Food Science and Technology, College of Biological Science and Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China.

出版信息

Foods. 2024 Aug 2;13(15):2452. doi: 10.3390/foods13152452.

Abstract

Rice wine is primarily crafted from grains through saccharification and liquification with the help of Qu. Qu plays an important role in the formation of the flavor quality of rice wine. Hongqu and Xiaoqu represent two prevalent varieties of Qu that are typically utilized in the brewing process of rice wine and play a crucial role in its production. In this study, GC, GC-MS, HPLC, and metagenomic sequencing techniques were used to contrast the microbial flora, biogenic amines, and aroma characteristics developed during the fermentation of rice wines, with Hongqu and Xiaoqu being used as initiating agents for the brewing process. The results show that the content of higher alcohols (including n-propanol, isobutanol, 3-methyl-1-butanol, and phenethyl alcohol) in rice wine brewed with Xiaoqu (XQW) was significantly higher than that in rice wine brewed with Hongqu (HQW). Contrarily, the concentration of biogenic amines in HQW surpassed that of XQW by a notable margin, but tyramine was significantly enriched in XQW and not detected in HQW. In addition, a multivariate statistical analysis revealed distinct disparities in the constitution of volatile components between HQW and XQW. Hexanoic acid, ethyl acetate, isoamyl acetate, ethyl caproate, ethyl decanoate, 2-methoxy-4-vinylphenol, etc., were identified as the characteristic aroma-active compounds in HQW and XQW. A microbiome analysis based on metagenomic sequencing showed that HQW and XQW had different dominant microorganisms in the brewing process. , , , and were identified as the primary microbial genera in the HQW fermentation period, while , , , and were the main microbial genera in the XQW brewing process. A bioinformatics analysis revealed that the concentrations of microbial genes involved in biogenic amines and esters biosynthesis were significantly higher in HQW than those in XQW, while the content of genes relevant to glycolysis, higher alcohol biosynthesis, and fatty acid metabolism was significantly higher in XQW than in HQW, which are the possible reasons for the difference in flavor quality between the two kinds of rice wine from the perspective of microbial functional genes.

摘要

米酒主要是通过谷物在曲的帮助下进行糖化和液化酿造而成。曲在米酒风味品质的形成中起着重要作用。红曲和小曲是两种常见的曲,通常用于米酒的酿造过程,并在其生产中发挥关键作用。在本研究中,采用气相色谱(GC)、气相色谱 - 质谱联用(GC - MS)、高效液相色谱(HPLC)和宏基因组测序技术,以红曲和小曲作为酿造起始剂,对比米酒发酵过程中形成的微生物群落、生物胺和香气特征。结果表明,用小曲酿造的米酒(XQW)中高级醇(包括正丙醇、异丁醇、3 - 甲基 - 1 - 丁醇和苯乙醇)的含量显著高于用红曲酿造的米酒(HQW)。相反,HQW中生物胺的浓度明显超过XQW,但酪胺在XQW中显著富集,在HQW中未检测到。此外,多变量统计分析显示HQW和XQW之间挥发性成分的组成存在明显差异。己酸、乙酸乙酯、乙酸异戊酯、己酸乙酯、癸酸乙酯、2 - 甲氧基 - 4 - 乙烯基苯酚等被确定为HQW和XQW中的特征香气活性化合物。基于宏基因组测序的微生物群落分析表明,HQW和XQW在酿造过程中具有不同的优势微生物。 、 、 、 和 被确定为HQW发酵期的主要微生物属,而 、 、 、 和 是XQW酿造过程中的主要微生物属。生物信息学分析表明,参与生物胺和酯生物合成的微生物基因浓度在HQW中显著高于XQW,而与糖酵解、高级醇生物合成和脂肪酸代谢相关的基因含量在XQW中显著高于HQW,从微生物功能基因的角度来看,这可能是两种米酒风味品质差异的原因。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/746a/11311568/c1996227ea48/foods-13-02452-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验