Yang Yaru, Takasu Koji, Suyama Hiroki, Ji Xiangnan, Xu Murong, Liu Zihao
Architecture Course, Graduate School of Environmental Engineering, The University of Kitakyushu, 1-1 Hibikino Wakamatsu, Kitakyushu 808-0135, Fukuoka, Japan.
Department of Architecture, Faculty of Environmental Engineering, The University of Kitakyushu, 1-1 Hibikino Wakamatsu, Kitakyushu 808-0135, Fukuoka, Japan.
Materials (Basel). 2024 Jul 27;17(15):3723. doi: 10.3390/ma17153723.
Biomass fly ash is a sustainable, eco-friendly cement substitute with economic and performance benefits, being renewable compared to coal fly ash. This study examines using biomass fly ash (BFA) as a sustainable cement substitute, comparing it with Class F fly ash (CFA). With a water-binder ratio of 0.5 and replacement rates of 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, and 30% (by mass), the research highlights BFA's promising applications. BFA and CFA were mixed into cement paste/mortar to analyze their reactivity and properties, with hydration products CH and C-S-H evaluated at 7, 28, and 91 days. Compressive strength, micro-pore structure, and drying shrinkage (assessed from 7 to 182 days) were tested. Results showed BFA had similar pozzolanic reactions to CFA at later stages. While compressive strength decreased with higher BFA replacement rates, early-stage performance matched CFA; growth was CFA-10 (18 MPa) and BFA-10 (17.6 MPa). BFA mortars exhibited slightly better deformation properties. BFA-30 cement had superior performance, with a lower drying shrinkage rate of 65.7% from 14 to 56 days compared to CFA-10's 73.4% and a more stable shrinkage growth rate decrease to 8.4% versus CFA-10's 6.4% after 56 days. This study concluded that BFA, usable without preprocessing, performed best at a 10-15% replacement rate.
生物质粉煤灰是一种可持续、环保的水泥替代品,具有经济和性能优势,与煤粉煤灰相比具有可再生性。本研究考察了使用生物质粉煤灰(BFA)作为可持续水泥替代品,并将其与F类粉煤灰(CFA)进行比较。在水胶比为0.5且替代率为10%、15%、20%、25%和30%(质量分数)的情况下,该研究突出了BFA的应用前景。将BFA和CFA掺入水泥浆体/砂浆中,分析它们的反应活性和性能,并在7天、28天和91天评估水化产物CH和C-S-H。测试了抗压强度、微孔结构和干燥收缩(从7天到182天进行评估)。结果表明,BFA在后期具有与CFA相似的火山灰反应。虽然随着BFA替代率的提高抗压强度降低,但早期性能与CFA相当;强度增长情况为CFA-10(18MPa)和BFA-10(17.6MPa)。BFA砂浆表现出稍好的变形性能。BFA-30水泥具有优异的性能,与CFA-10在14至56天73.4%的干燥收缩率相比,其干燥收缩率为65.7%,且在56天后收缩增长率更稳定地降至8.4%,而CFA-10为6.4%。本研究得出结论,无需预处理即可使用的BFA在替代率为10-15%时性能最佳。