• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于微创修复的长石质陶瓷的表面改性:空气颗粒类型对表面性能和双轴弯曲强度的影响。

Surface Modification of Feldspathic Ceramic Used for Minimally Invasive Restorations: Effect of Airborne Particle Type on the Surface Properties and Biaxial Flexural Strength.

作者信息

Hoffmann Moritz, Schmeiser Felix, Donmez Mustafa Borga, Meinen John, Stawarczyk Bogna

机构信息

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80336 Munich, Germany.

Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2024 Aug 1;17(15):3777. doi: 10.3390/ma17153777.

DOI:10.3390/ma17153777
PMID:39124441
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11312512/
Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of airborne particle abrasion with different particles on the surface free energy, roughness, and biaxial flexural strength of a feldspathic ceramic by comparing it with hydrofluoric acid etching, the standard surface treatment, and polishing. Square-shaped feldspathic ceramic specimens (12 mm × 12 mm × 1.2 mm) were divided into subgroups as airborne particles abraded with alumina (AO3a, AO3b, AO25, AO50a, AO50b, AO90, AO110a, AO110b, AO120a, and AO120b), silica (SO50a, SO50b, SO100, and SO100/200), or nutshell granule (NS100/200), hydrofluoric acid etched, and polished (n = 12). Surface free energy (n = 5), roughness (n = 5), biaxial flexural strength (n = 12), and Weibull moduli (n = 12) were investigated. Data were evaluated with 1-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests, and possible correlations were investigated with Pearson's correlation (α = 0.05). SO100/200 mostly had lower surface free energy ( ≤ 0.011), and polishing and etching led to higher surface free energy than AO3a, AO3b, and AO120a ( ≤ 0.031). Polished, SO100, and SO50b specimens mostly had lower roughness and AO125 had the highest roughness ( ≤ 0.029). SO100/200 mostly had lower biaxial flexural strength ( ≤ 0.041), and etched specimens had higher biaxial flexural strength than AO120a, AO120b, and SO50b ( ≤ 0.043). AO3b had the highest (33.56) and AO120b had the lowest (11.8) Weibull modulus. There was a weak positive correlation between the surface free energy and the biaxial flexural strength (r = 0.267, = 0.011). A larger particle size mostly resulted in higher roughness, which was also affected by the particle shape. Most of the test groups had similar biaxial flexural strength to that of the hydrofluoric acid-etched group. Therefore, for tested feldspathic ceramic, airborne particle abrasion with tested parameters may be a suitable alternative without causing any further damage.

摘要

本研究旨在通过将不同颗粒的空气颗粒磨损与氢氟酸蚀刻(标准表面处理)和抛光进行比较,评估其对长石质陶瓷表面自由能、粗糙度和双轴弯曲强度的影响。将方形长石质陶瓷试样(12 mm×12 mm×1.2 mm)分为用氧化铝(AO3a、AO3b、AO25、AO50a、AO50b、AO90、AO110a、AO110b、AO120a和AO120b)、二氧化硅(SO50a、SO50b、SO100和SO100/200)或坚果壳颗粒(NS100/200)进行空气颗粒磨损、氢氟酸蚀刻和抛光的亚组(n = 12)。研究了表面自由能(n = 5)、粗糙度(n = 5)、双轴弯曲强度(n = 12)和威布尔模量(n = 12)。数据采用单因素方差分析和Tukey HSD检验进行评估,并采用Pearson相关性分析研究可能的相关性(α = 0.05)。SO100/200大多具有较低的表面自由能(≤0.011),且抛光和蚀刻导致的表面自由能高于AO3a、AO3b和AO120a(≤0.031)。抛光、SO100和SO50b试样大多具有较低的粗糙度,而AO125具有最高的粗糙度(≤0.029)。SO100/200大多具有较低的双轴弯曲强度(≤0.041),且蚀刻试样的双轴弯曲强度高于AO120a、AO120b和SO50b(≤0.043)。AO3b的威布尔模量最高(33.56),AO120b的威布尔模量最低(11.8)。表面自由能与双轴弯曲强度之间存在弱正相关(r = 0.267,P = 0.011)。较大的粒径大多导致较高的粗糙度,这也受颗粒形状的影响。大多数测试组的双轴弯曲强度与氢氟酸蚀刻组相似。因此,对于测试的长石质陶瓷,采用测试参数的空气颗粒磨损可能是一种合适的替代方法,不会造成任何进一步的损伤。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3d6/11312512/3865784512ce/materials-17-03777-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3d6/11312512/d3466ce3d0df/materials-17-03777-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3d6/11312512/8e4c255c9303/materials-17-03777-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3d6/11312512/2baaed6ee178/materials-17-03777-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3d6/11312512/a23854538c29/materials-17-03777-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3d6/11312512/3865784512ce/materials-17-03777-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3d6/11312512/d3466ce3d0df/materials-17-03777-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3d6/11312512/8e4c255c9303/materials-17-03777-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3d6/11312512/2baaed6ee178/materials-17-03777-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3d6/11312512/a23854538c29/materials-17-03777-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3d6/11312512/3865784512ce/materials-17-03777-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Surface Modification of Feldspathic Ceramic Used for Minimally Invasive Restorations: Effect of Airborne Particle Type on the Surface Properties and Biaxial Flexural Strength.用于微创修复的长石质陶瓷的表面改性:空气颗粒类型对表面性能和双轴弯曲强度的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2024 Aug 1;17(15):3777. doi: 10.3390/ma17153777.
2
To Evaluate Effect of Airborne Particle Abrasion using Different Abrasives Particles and Compare Two Commercial Available Zirconia on Flexural Strength on Heat Treatment.评估使用不同磨料颗粒的空气颗粒磨损效果,并比较两种市售氧化锆在热处理时的抗弯强度。
Int J Biomed Sci. 2017 Jun;13(2):93-112.
3
Effect of surface treatments on the biaxial flexural strength, phase transformation, and surface roughness of bilayered porcelain/zirconia dental ceramics.表面处理对双层瓷/氧化锆牙科陶瓷双轴弯曲强度、相变及表面粗糙度的影响
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Jun;113(6):585-95. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.002. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
4
Effect of Porcelain-to-Zirconia Ratio and Bonding Strategy on the Biaxial Flexural Strength and Weibull Characteristics of a Stress-Free Bilayer CAD/CAM Ceramic System.烤瓷-氧化锆比例和键合策略对无应力双层 CAD/CAM 陶瓷系统双轴弯曲强度和威布尔特征的影响。
Int J Prosthodont. 2022 Jul-Aug;35(4):469-479. doi: 10.11607/ijp.7551.
5
Influence of hydrofluoric acid concentration on the flexural strength of a feldspathic ceramic.氢氟酸浓度对长石质陶瓷抗弯强度的影响
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015 Aug;48:241-248. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.03.025. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
6
Influence of particle abrasion or hydrofluoric acid etching on lithium disilicate flexural strength.颗粒磨损或氢氟酸蚀刻对二硅酸锂抗弯强度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Nov;112(5):1164-70. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.021. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
7
Analysis of Surface Roughness, Fracture Toughness, and Weibull Characteristics of Different Framework-Veneer Dental Ceramic Assemblies after Grinding, Polishing, and Glazing.不同基底-饰面瓷牙体修复组件研磨、抛光和上釉后表面粗糙度、断裂韧性和威布尔特征的分析。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e216-e221. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12653. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
8
Effect of surface treatments on biaxial flexural strength, fatigue resistance, and fracture toughness of high versus low translucency zirconia.表面处理对高、低透明度氧化锆双轴弯曲强度、耐疲劳性和断裂韧性的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Sep 19;22(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02431-8.
9
The effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatment and bond strength of a zirconia veneering ceramic.氢氟酸表面处理对氧化锆贴面陶瓷的影响及粘结强度
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Sep;100(3):194-202. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60178-X.
10
Effect of air-particle abrasion protocols on the biaxial flexural strength, surface characteristics and phase transformation of zirconia after cyclic loading.载频循环后空气颗粒喷砂处理方案对氧化锆的双轴弯曲强度、表面特性和相转变的影响。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013 Apr;20:19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Jan 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Mechanical Properties of High- and Low-Fusing Zirconia Veneering Ceramics Fired on Different Trays and Substrates.在不同托盘和基底上烧制的高熔合与低熔合氧化锆饰面陶瓷的力学性能
Materials (Basel). 2024 May 10;17(10):2261. doi: 10.3390/ma17102261.
2
Influence of additives and binder on the physical properties of dental silicate glass-ceramic feedstock for additive manufacturing.添加剂和粘结剂对用于增材制造的牙科硅酸盐玻璃陶瓷原料物理性能的影响。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2024 Jul;155:106563. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106563. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
3
Influence of different surface finishing procedures of strength-gradient multilayered zirconia crowns on two-body wear and fracture load: Lithium silicate or leucite glazing versus polishing?
梯度压力层化氧化锆全瓷冠不同表面处理对二体磨耗及断裂负荷的影响:硅酸锂或透锂长石上釉与抛光相比?
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2024 Feb;150:106307. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106307. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
4
Comparison of the Micro-Shear Bond Strength of Resin Cements to CAD/CAM Glass Ceramics with Various Surface Treatments.不同表面处理下树脂水门汀与CAD/CAM玻璃陶瓷的微剪切粘结强度比较
Materials (Basel). 2023 Mar 26;16(7):2635. doi: 10.3390/ma16072635.
5
Shear Bond Strength of Two Repair Systems to Zirconia Ceramic by Different Surface Treatments.不同表面处理下两种修复系统与氧化锆陶瓷的剪切粘结强度
J Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Jul 19;13:e31. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2022.31. eCollection 2022.
6
A brief review on fatigue test of ceramic and some related matters in Dentistry.关于牙科陶瓷疲劳试验及相关问题的简要综述。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023 Feb;138:105607. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105607. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
7
Bond strength between temporary 3D printable resin and conventional resin composite: influence of cleaning methods and air-abrasion parameters.临时 3D 打印树脂与传统树脂复合材料之间的粘结强度:清洗方法和喷砂参数的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Jan;27(1):31-43. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04800-7. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
8
Surface characterization of indirect restorative materials submitted to different etching protocols.不同蚀刻方案处理的间接修复材料的表面特性。
J Dent. 2022 Dec;127:104348. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104348. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
9
Overview of Several Typical Ceramic Materials for Restorative Dentistry.几种典型的口腔修复用陶瓷材料概述。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jul 18;2022:8451445. doi: 10.1155/2022/8451445. eCollection 2022.
10
An In Vitro Study on the Shear Bond Strength of Feldspathic Porcelain to Nickel Chromium Alloy and Cobalt Chromium Alloy after Various Surface Treatments.不同表面处理后长石质瓷与镍铬合金及钴铬合金剪切粘结强度的体外研究
Int J Dent. 2022 May 30;2022:2557127. doi: 10.1155/2022/2557127. eCollection 2022.