Abdulla Mohammed A, Hasan Radhwan H
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Mosul University, Mosul, Iraq.
J Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Jul 19;13:e31. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2022.31. eCollection 2022.
Intraoral repair has been suggested as a treatment option to repair the chipping or fracture of veneered zirconia; the success of the procedure is mainly determined by the bonding between zirconia and composite resin. The present study aimed to investigate and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of two intraoral repair systems to zirconia ceramic treated with a laser or air-abrasion surface modification. Ninety tube-shaped samples (diameter of 10 mm and height of 4 mm) were divided into three main groups: Group I (zirconia 100%, n=30); Group II (veneer ceramic 100% n=30); Group III (zirconia with a veneer ceramic n=30). Each main group was subdivided into two subgroups (n=15): Subgroup A: samples repaired with Ceramic Repair N; Subgroup B: samples repaired with the Cimara Repair System. The subgroup samples were further subdivided based on the treated surface (n=5 samples): Control (no surface modification), Er,Cr:YSGG laser surface modification, and air-abrasion surface modification. The SBS was employed using a universal testing machine. The mode of failure was observed using a stereomicroscope. Significant differences were observed in the mean SBS values between the different surface modifications (˂0.05). Tukey's post hoc test showed that the air-abrasion surface modification of the veneer ceramic repaired with the Ceramic repair N system had the highest mean value (13.74 MPa) among the different groups, while no surface modification of zirconia repaired with the Cimara repair system had the lowest mean value (2.84 MPa). The control group (no surface modification) had the lowest mean value among all the treated groups. The SBS is surface modification-dependent, and higher SBS is obtained by air-abrasion than Er, Cr:YSGG laser surface modifications with the selected parameters. The Ceramic repair N system had significantly higher SBS for all surface-treated substrates than the Cimara repair system.
口内修复已被建议作为修复贴面氧化锆崩瓷或骨折的一种治疗选择;该手术的成功主要取决于氧化锆与复合树脂之间的粘结。本研究旨在调查和比较两种口内修复系统与经激光或空气喷砂表面改性处理的氧化锆陶瓷之间的剪切粘结强度(SBS)。九十根管状样本(直径10毫米,高度4毫米)被分为三个主要组:第一组(100%氧化锆,n = 30);第二组(100%贴面陶瓷,n = 30);第三组(含贴面陶瓷的氧化锆,n = 30)。每个主要组再细分为两个亚组(n = 15):A亚组:用陶瓷修复N修复的样本;B亚组:用Cimara修复系统修复的样本。亚组样本根据处理过的表面进一步细分(n = 5个样本):对照组(无表面改性)、Er,Cr:YSGG激光表面改性和空气喷砂表面改性。使用万能试验机测定SBS。使用体视显微镜观察失败模式。不同表面改性之间的平均SBS值存在显著差异(˂0.05)。Tukey事后检验表明,用陶瓷修复N系统修复的贴面陶瓷经空气喷砂表面改性后,在不同组中平均值最高(13.74兆帕),而用Cimara修复系统修复的未进行表面改性的氧化锆平均值最低(2.84兆帕)。对照组(无表面改性)在所有处理组中平均值最低。SBS取决于表面改性,在所选择的参数下,空气喷砂比Er,Cr:YSGG激光表面改性获得更高的SBS。对于所有表面处理的基材,陶瓷修复N系统的SBS显著高于Cimara修复系统。