Todorova Dimitrina, Yavorov Nikolay, Vrabič-Brodnjak Urška
Department of Pulp, Paper and Printing Arts, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, 1797 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Department of Textiles, Graphic Arts and Design, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Engineering, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Polymers (Basel). 2024 Jul 26;16(15):2127. doi: 10.3390/polym16152127.
In this study, a comparative analysis of silver nanoparticles treatment and chitosan coating on packaging paper barrier properties was carried out. In order to examine the water, grease, and antibacterial barrier properties of silver nanoparticle-treated and chitosan-coated laboratory-obtained paper samples, a mixture of bleached softwood and hardwood celluloses was used. In order to conduct the comparative analysis SEM, water contact angle, Cobb, and Kit tests were carried out on a cellulose sample, and four paper samples (three of them treated with silver nanoparticles-1, 2, and 3 mL/20 cm or chitosan coated-0.5, 1, and 2 g/m) together with the inhibition activity against nine Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, yeast, and fungal strains. The study found out that increasing the silver nanoparticle treatment and chitosan coating led to improved water resistance, while grease resistance was improved only for chitosan coated paper samples. Additionally, paper treated with 3 mL/20 cm of silver nanoparticles had the highest antibacterial protection (81.6%) against the Gram-positive bacterium , followed by Gram-negative (75.8%). For the rest of the studied microorganisms, the average efficiency of the treated paper was 40.79%. The treatment of the paper with 1 and 2 mL/20 cm of silver nanoparticles was less effective-27.13 and 39.83%, respectively. The antibacterial protection of 2 g/m chitosan-coated paper samples was the most effective (average 79%) against the tested bacterial, yeast, and fungal strains. At 1 and 0.5 g/m chitosan coatings, the efficiency was 72.38% and 54.67%, respectively. Gram-positive bacteria, yeasts, and fungal strains were more sensitive to chitosan supplementation.
在本研究中,对银纳米颗粒处理和壳聚糖涂层对包装纸阻隔性能进行了比较分析。为了检测经银纳米颗粒处理和壳聚糖涂层处理的实验室制得的纸样的防水、防油脂和抗菌阻隔性能,使用了漂白软木和硬木纤维素的混合物。为了进行比较分析,对纤维素样品以及四个纸样(其中三个用1、2和3 mL/20 cm银纳米颗粒处理,另外三个用0.5、1和2 g/m壳聚糖涂层)进行了扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、水接触角、科布(Cobb)和基特(Kit)测试,并测试了其对九种革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性细菌、酵母和真菌菌株的抑制活性。研究发现,增加银纳米颗粒处理量和壳聚糖涂层量可提高防水性,而仅壳聚糖涂层的纸样的防油脂性得到了改善。此外,用3 mL/20 cm银纳米颗粒处理的纸张对革兰氏阳性菌的抗菌保护效果最高(81.6%),其次是革兰氏阴性菌(75.8%)。对于其余研究的微生物,处理过的纸张的平均效率为40.79%。用1和2 mL/20 cm银纳米颗粒处理纸张的效果较差,分别为27.13%和39.83%。2 g/m壳聚糖涂层的纸样对测试的细菌、酵母和真菌菌株的抗菌保护效果最有效(平均79%)。在壳聚糖涂层量为1和0.5 g/m时,效率分别为72.38%和54.67%。革兰氏阳性菌、酵母和真菌菌株对壳聚糖添加更为敏感。