Leal Caroline de Farias Charamba, Miranda Samille Biasi, Alves Neto Everardo Lucena de, Freitas Keitry, de Sousa Wesley Viana, Lins Rodrigo Barros Esteves, de Andrade Ana Karina Maciel, Montes Marcos Antônio Japiassú Resende
Departament of Dental Materials, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco, Recife 50100-130, PE, Brazil.
Departament of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of São Leopoldo de Mandic, Campinas 13045-755, SP, Brazil.
Polymers (Basel). 2024 Jul 30;16(15):2172. doi: 10.3390/polym16152172.
The objective was to compare the color match and color stability behavior of single- and multi-shade resin-based composites (RBCs) used for direct restorations. This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Randomized clinical trials evaluating the shade performance of single-shade RBCs in direct restorations were included. A search of the scientific literature was performed in five databases (April 2024). The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4, calculating the risk difference (RD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the dichotomous outcome using a random effects model. Bias was assessed using the RoB 2.0 tool, and certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADEpro tool. Four studies were selected, with 263 restorations analyzed. The results showed comparable performance between single-shade RBCs and multi-shade RBCs in terms of color match and color stability over 12 months. Three studies had a low risk of bias with all expected results, and one study had some concerns. The certainty of evidence for color stability was considered low for all follow-up periods due to the small number of events and sample size. According to the United States Public Health Service Evaluation (USPHS) and the World Dental Federation (FDI), there is comparable clinical color performance between single-shade and multi-shade RBCs over 12 months.
目的是比较用于直接修复的单色调和多色调树脂基复合材料(RBC)的颜色匹配和颜色稳定性表现。本综述按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南进行。纳入了评估单色调RBC在直接修复中颜色表现的随机临床试验。于2024年4月在五个数据库中进行了科学文献检索。使用RevMan 5.4进行Meta分析,采用随机效应模型计算二分结局的风险差异(RD)和95%置信区间(CI)。使用RoB 2.0工具评估偏倚,使用GRADEpro工具评估证据的确定性。共选取了四项研究,分析了263颗修复体。结果显示,在12个月的时间里,单色调RBC和多色调RBC在颜色匹配和颜色稳定性方面表现相当。三项研究的偏倚风险较低,所有预期结果均如此,一项研究存在一些问题。由于事件数量和样本量较少,所有随访期的颜色稳定性证据确定性均被认为较低。根据美国公共卫生服务评估(USPHS)和世界牙科联盟(FDI),单色调和多色调RBC在12个月内的临床颜色表现相当。