Suppr超能文献

采用单色调或通用型复合材料进行大复合修复体的颜色匹配和颜色再现。

Color matching and color recovery in large composite restorations using single-shade or universal composites.

机构信息

Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, SE, Brazil.

Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, SE, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz Dent J. 2024 Mar 22;35:e245665. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202405665. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

This study assessed the color-matching ability and color recovery of unprepared teeth when using single-shade composites and a universal composite in large restorations. Buccal and palatine surface colors of molars were measured with a spectrophotometer (CIELAB) before preparing round cavities (6 mm in diameter, 2 mm in depth). The cavities were randomly filled with a single-shade composite (Omnichroma, Diamond One, or Vittra APS Unique) or a universal composite (Filtek Universal). Color measurements of the restored cavities were taken, and overall color differences (ΔEab and ΔE00) and differences in the whitening index for dentistry (ΔWID) from baseline were calculated. Additionally, visual assessments of a color match to the surrounding enamel were performed by forty evaluators (laypersons and undergraduate students of dentistry) in a viewing booth under illuminant D65, with rating scores from 0 (no color mismatch) to 4 (not acceptable). Data were analyzed using RM or one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). Results showed that the restorations generally exhibited whiter colors (WID ranged from 27.9 to 41.3) than the unprepared teeth (WID ranged from 15.9 to 19.3). The composite Filtek Universal demonstrated the lowest color discrepancy (ΔWID = 8.6; ΔE00 = 10.8; and ΔE00 = 6.2), and no significant differences were observed among the evaluated single-shade composites. Furthermore, all composites showed similar and adequate color matches to the surrounding enamel. However, it is important to note that despite their ability to match the surrounding enamel reasonably, none of the composites evaluated in large restorations fully recovered the color observed in unprepared teeth.

摘要

本研究评估了在大修复体中使用单色调复合材料和通用复合材料时未经预备的牙齿的颜色匹配能力和颜色恢复能力。在预备圆形窝洞(直径 6mm,深度 2mm)之前,使用分光光度计(CIELAB)测量磨牙的颊侧和腭侧表面颜色。将窝洞随机用单色调复合材料(Omnichroma、Diamond One 或 Vittra APS Unique)或通用复合材料(Filtek Universal)填充。测量修复后的窝洞的颜色,并计算总体颜色差异(ΔEab 和 ΔE00)和牙科增白指数的差异(ΔWID)与基线相比。此外,在 D65 照明下,40 名评估者(非专业人士和牙科学的本科生)在观察亭中对与周围釉质的颜色匹配进行视觉评估,评分从 0(无颜色不匹配)到 4(不可接受)。使用 RM 或单向 ANOVA(α=0.05)分析数据。结果表明,与未经预备的牙齿相比,修复体通常显示出更白的颜色(WID 范围从 27.9 到 41.3)。复合材料 Filtek Universal 显示出最低的颜色差异(ΔWID=8.6;ΔE00=10.8;ΔE00=6.2),且在所评估的单色调复合材料之间未观察到显著差异。此外,所有复合材料与周围釉质的颜色匹配都相似且足够。然而,重要的是要注意,尽管它们能够合理地匹配周围的釉质,但在所评估的大修复体中没有一种复合材料能够完全恢复未经预备的牙齿所观察到的颜色。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验