• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用有机和缓释肥料提高芒果产量和土壤健康:多方面评估。

Enhancing mango yield and soil health with organic and slow-release fertilizers: A multifaceted evaluation.

机构信息

School of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, Hainan Province, China; Jincheng Association for Science and Technology, Jincheng 048000, Shanxi Province, China.

School of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, Hainan Province, China.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2024 Nov 15;951:175297. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175297. Epub 2024 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175297
PMID:39127209
Abstract

Excessive utilization of chemical fertilizers in mango orchards not only hampers the attainment of sustainable harvests but also poses significant ecological detriments. This investigation proposes a promising solution by advocating the judicious replacement of chemical fertilizers with organic fertilizer (OF) and slow-release fertilizer (SRF), with potential to bolster soil health and augment crop productivity. In light of the promise held by these alternatives, it is imperative to establish detailed fertilization protocols for enhanced sustainable practices in mango farming. This two-year field study employed a comprehensive suite of seven fertilization strategies, unveiling that a 25 % chemical fertilizers substitution with OF and SRF improved mango yields by 12.5 % and 11.3 %, respectively, over standard practices. Additionally, these approaches substantially augmented the nutritional quality of mangoes, evident from Vitamin C enhancements of 53.9 % to 56.9 %, and improvements in sugar-to-acid ratio (19.2 %-30.3 %) and solid-to-acid ratio (12.1 %-25.3 %). Notably, the application of OF and SRF led to increased leaf nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations, while simultaneously reducing soil phosphorus and potassium levels. Furthermore, these fertilizers fostered the growth of beneficial soil microorganisms, namely Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria, and strengthened the synergy within the soil bacterial community, hence optimizing bacterial competition and nutrient cycling. The study proposes that the adoption of OF or SRF can effectively regulate soil nutrient balance, promote resilient and functional soil bacterial ecosystems, and ultimately improve mango yield and fruit quality. It recommends a fertilization scheme incorporating 25 % organic or slow-release nitrogen to align with ecological sustainability goals, promoting a more vigorous and resilient soil and crop system.

摘要

过量使用化肥不仅会阻碍芒果园的可持续收成,还会对生态造成严重危害。本研究提出了一个有前景的解决方案,即提倡用有机肥(OF)和缓释肥(SRF)代替化肥,这有可能增强土壤健康并提高作物生产力。鉴于这些替代品的潜力,制定详细的施肥方案对于增强芒果种植的可持续性实践至关重要。这项为期两年的田间研究采用了综合的七种施肥策略,结果表明,用 OF 和 SRF 替代 25%的化肥可使芒果产量分别提高 12.5%和 11.3%,优于标准做法。此外,这些方法还大大提高了芒果的营养价值,维生素 C 提高了 53.9%至 56.9%,糖酸比(19.2%-30.3%)和固酸比(12.1%-25.3%)也得到了改善。值得注意的是,OF 和 SRF 的应用增加了叶片氮和磷的浓度,同时降低了土壤磷和钾的水平。此外,这些肥料促进了有益土壤微生物(放线菌和变形菌)的生长,并增强了土壤细菌群落内的协同作用,从而优化了细菌竞争和养分循环。该研究提出,采用 OF 或 SRF 可以有效地调节土壤养分平衡,促进有弹性和功能性的土壤细菌生态系统,最终提高芒果的产量和果实品质。它建议采用一种施肥方案,将 25%的有机或缓释氮纳入其中,以符合生态可持续性目标,促进更有活力和弹性的土壤和作物系统。

相似文献

1
Enhancing mango yield and soil health with organic and slow-release fertilizers: A multifaceted evaluation.用有机和缓释肥料提高芒果产量和土壤健康:多方面评估。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Nov 15;951:175297. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175297. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
2
Impact of Fertilizer on Crop Yield and C:N:P Stoichiometry in Arid and Semi-Arid Soil.肥料对干旱和半干旱土壤中作物产量及碳氮磷化学计量比的影响
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 20;18(8):4341. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084341.
3
Long-term nitrogen fertilization decreases bacterial diversity and favors the growth of Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria in agro-ecosystems across the globe.长期施氮肥会降低农业生态系统中细菌的多样性,并有利于放线菌和变形菌的生长。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Aug;24(8):3452-3461. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14163. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
4
Bio-Organic Fertilizer Promotes Pear Yield by Shaping the Rhizosphere Microbiome Composition and Functions.生物有机肥通过塑造根际微生物群落组成和功能促进梨树的产量。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Dec 21;10(6):e0357222. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03572-22. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
5
[Effects of Different Microbial Fertilizers on Soil Quality and Maize Yield in Coastal Saline Soil].[不同微生物肥料对滨海盐渍土土壤质量及玉米产量的影响]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2024 Jul 8;45(7):4279-4292. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202307148.
6
Adaptive evaluation for agricultural sustainability of different fertilizer management options for a green manure-maize rotation system: Impacts on crop yield, soil biochemical properties and organic carbon fractions.绿肥-玉米轮作系统不同肥料管理方案农业可持续性的适应性评价:对作物产量、土壤生化性质和有机碳组分的影响
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jan 15;908:168170. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168170. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
7
[Effects of partial substitution of chemical fertilizer with organic fertilizer on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community of ].[有机肥部分替代化肥对[]丛枝菌根真菌群落的影响] 。 你提供的原文似乎不完整,括号内应有具体内容。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2023 Feb;34(2):481-490. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202302.011.
8
Does dual reduction in chemical fertilizer and pesticides improve nutrient loss and tea yield and quality? A pilot study in a green tea garden in Shaoxing, Zhejiang Province, China.化肥和农药双减是否能提高养分流失和茶叶产量与质量?来自中国浙江绍兴绿茶园的一项试点研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jan;26(3):2464-2476. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3732-1. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
9
Comprehensive assessment of combined inorganic and organic fertilization strategies on cotton cultivation: implications for sustainable agriculture.综合评估棉花种植中无机和有机肥料结合的施肥策略:对可持续农业的启示。
J Sci Food Agric. 2024 Nov;104(14):8456-8468. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.13673. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
10
Long-term effects of combination of organic and inorganic fertilizer on soil properties and microorganisms in a Quaternary Red Clay.长期施用有机肥和无机肥对第四纪红土土壤性质和微生物的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 16;16(12):e0261387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261387. eCollection 2021.