Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Gazi University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey.
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2024 Mar;58(2):116-123. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2024.23204.
It is important to protect the mobile segment in the lumbar region in scoliosis surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological results of patients who underwent surgery for a diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) at L3 or L4 level.
The study included 36 patients who underwent surgical treatment in our institution for a diagnosis of Lenke type 5 and 6 AIS with a follow-up period of at least 24 months. The patients were separated into 2 groups according to the LIV level of L3 (n=21) and L4 (n=15). These 2 groups were compared preoperatively (PO), early postoperative (EPO), and at the final follow-up examination (last control (LC)) with respect to radiological parameters in the coronal and sagittal planes, and the Scoliosis Research Society - 22 (SRS-22) questionnaire values.
In both groups the mean age (L3: 16 ± 7.3; L4: 17 ± 6.1 years) and follow-up periods (L3: 44 ± 20; L4: 47 ± 18 months) were similar. Radiologically, the L4 group had a greater Cobb angle in the scoliosis main curves measured PO (P=.001). The Cobb angles measured at EPO (P=.767) and at LC (P=.674) were similar in both groups. No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in respect of the LIV tilt values at PO (P=.469), EPO (P=.297), and LC (P=.065). When the groups were evaluated separately, the LIV tilt values at EPO and LC were similar in the L4 group (EPO: 6.93 ± 3.058; LC: 7.26 ± 2.313; P=.618). In the L3 patients, although there seemed to be a significant increase in LIV tilt values when EPO values were compared with LC values (EPO: 8.47 ± 3.970; LC: 9.57 ± 3.76; P=.030), this was within the error range of Cobb angle measurement. The results of the SRS-22 questionnaire showed significantly better results in the L3 group in the domains of pain, function/activity, mental health, and satisfaction with treatment (P=.011, P=.002, P=.019, P=.046, respectively).
There was no radiological superiority between L3 and L4 LIV groups in the thoracolumbar/lumbar curve patients. However, according to the SRS-22 questionnaire, the results of patients with L3 level LIV were better in the areas of pain, function/activity, mental health, and satisfaction with treatment. Cite this article as: Baymurat AC, Tokgoz MA, Abdulaliyev F, Tosun MF, Can MM, Senkoylu A. Which lumbar vertebra should be the lowest level of fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of Lenke types 5 and 6? Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc., 2024;58(2):116-123.
保护腰椎区域的活动节段在脊柱侧凸手术中非常重要。本研究旨在比较诊断为青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)并融合至最低固定节段(LIV)为 L3 或 L4 水平的患者的临床和影像学结果。
本研究纳入了 36 名在我院接受 Lenke 5 型和 6 型 AIS 手术治疗且随访时间至少 24 个月的患者。根据 LIV 为 L3(n=21)和 L4(n=15),将患者分为 2 组。在术前(PO)、早期术后(EPO)和最终随访检查(末次随访(LC)),对这 2 组患者进行冠状面和矢状面的影像学参数比较,以及 SRS-22 问卷值评估。
在这 2 组中,平均年龄(L3:16 ± 7.3;L4:17 ± 6.1 岁)和随访时间(L3:44 ± 20;L4:47 ± 18 个月)相似。在 PO 时,L4 组的主弯脊柱侧凸 Cobb 角较大(P=.001)。EPO (P=.767)和 LC (P=.674)时的 Cobb 角在两组之间相似。在 PO(P=.469)、EPO(P=.297)和 LC(P=.065)时,两组之间 LIV 倾斜值无显著差异。当对两组分别进行评估时,L4 组在 EPO 和 LC 时的 LIV 倾斜值相似(EPO:6.93 ± 3.058;LC:7.26 ± 2.313;P=.618)。在 L3 患者中,虽然 EPO 与 LC 时的 LIV 倾斜值比较时似乎有显著增加(EPO:8.47 ± 3.970;LC:9.57 ± 3.76;P=.030),但这仍在 Cobb 角测量的误差范围内。SRS-22 问卷的结果表明,L3 组在疼痛、功能/活动、心理健康和治疗满意度方面的结果明显更好(P=.011,P=.002,P=.019,P=.046,分别)。
在胸腰椎/腰椎曲线患者中,L3 和 L4 LIV 组之间没有影像学上的优势。然而,根据 SRS-22 问卷,L3 水平 LIV 患者在疼痛、功能/活动、心理健康和治疗满意度方面的结果更好。