Suppr超能文献

在 Lenke 5C/6C 型特发性脊柱侧凸的青少年中,与不使用直接椎体旋转(DVR)时的最低固定椎体 L4 相比,当使用 LEV 时最低固定椎体 L3 与直接椎体旋转(DVR)的比较。

Comparison between the lowest instrumented vertebrae L3 with the use of direct vertebrae rotation (DVR) and the lowest instrumented vertebrae L4 for non-DVR in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis Lenke 5C/6C: when LEV is L4.

机构信息

Department of Spine Surgery and Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

National Clinical Research Centre for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Aug 19;19(1):492. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04961-z.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

As there are no substantial selection criteria for determining the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) Lenke 5C/6C, thus, many surgeons base their selection on experience. The study aims to compare the selection of the lowest instrumented vertebrae (LIV) lumbar vertebra three (L3) with the use of direct vertebrae rotation (DVR) to the lowest instrumented vertebrae (LIV) lumbar vertebra four (L4) with the use of non-DVR for the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) Lenke 5C/6C when the lower end vertebrae (LEV) is at lumbar vertebrae four (L4).

METHODS

This prospective study involved 101 patients who were divided into two groups based on different techniques. The patients were prospectively followed up for at least four years. All patients included in the study had a lower end vertebra (LEV) at L4, while patients older than 18 years and patients with prior surgical procedures were excluded. The DVR group consisted of 49 patients, and the non-DVR group included 51 patients.

RESULTS

The preoperative mean LIV disc angle was 3.1 ± 3 and 3.1 ± 1, P = 0.097, which corrected to 1.2 ± 0 and 1.1 ± 0 in both groups at 4-year follow-up without statistical significance. The LIVDA and LIVT were statistically insignificant at the preoperative, and there were no significant differences at the follow-up visitation. The DVR group achieved a satisfactory coronal and Cobb's angle correction compared to the NDVR group; however, there were no statistical differences at the follow-up visitations. Both groups achieve a satisfactory correction rate without substantial significance in clinical and radiological outcomes. Furthermore, no post-surgical complications were recorded in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

DVR is suitable for selecting L3 as the LIV in AIS Lenke 5C/6C compared to L4 in non-DVR. DVR preserved more segments without substantial complications during the follow-up visitations. Nevertheless, both groups will continue to be followed up to prevent adding-on post-surgical complications.

摘要

目的

由于在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)Lenke 5C/6C 中,确定最低固定椎(LIV)没有实质性的选择标准,因此许多外科医生根据经验进行选择。本研究旨在比较直接椎体旋转(DVR)选择第三腰椎(L3)作为最低固定椎(LIV)与非 DVR 选择第四腰椎(L4)作为最低固定椎(LIV)在治疗 AIS Lenke 5C/6C 时,当下端椎(LEV)位于第四腰椎(L4)时的效果。

方法

本前瞻性研究纳入了 101 例患者,根据不同的技术将患者分为两组。所有患者均进行了至少 4 年的前瞻性随访。所有入组患者的下端椎(LEV)均位于 L4,排除 18 岁以上患者和既往手术患者。DVR 组 49 例,非 DVR 组 51 例。

结果

术前两组 LIV 椎间盘角平均分别为 3.1±3 和 3.1±1,P=0.097,术后 4 年随访时分别矫正为 1.2±0 和 1.1±0,差异无统计学意义。术前 LIVDA 和 LIVT 差异无统计学意义,随访时无显著差异。DVR 组在冠状面和 Cobb 角矫正方面优于非 DVR 组,但随访时差异无统计学意义。两组在临床和影像学结果方面均获得满意的矫正率,差异无统计学意义。此外,两组均未出现术后并发症。

结论

与非 DVR 相比,DVR 适合选择 L3 作为 AIS Lenke 5C/6C 的 LIV,而不是 L4。DVR 在随访期间保留了更多的节段,没有明显的并发症。然而,两组将继续随访,以防止术后并发症的发生。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f154/11334495/b3657c05da64/13018_2024_4961_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验