Ndawula C, Emudong P, Muwereza N, Currà C
National Agricultural Research Organization, P.O Box 295, Entebbe, Uganda; National Livestock Resources Research Institute, P.O Box 5704, Wakiso, Uganda.
National Agricultural Research Organization, P.O Box 295, Entebbe, Uganda; National Livestock Resources Research Institute, P.O Box 5704, Wakiso, Uganda.
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2024 Nov;15(6):102386. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2024.102386. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
Instead of using the Infection and Treatment Method (ITM)-based vaccine, is it possible to control East Coast Fever (ECF) through blocking Theileria parva transmission in ticks and cattle? This review pursues this question. It's over 100 years since Arnold Theiler (1912) first illustrated the natural ITM as a vaccination approach against ECF-cattle disease. The approach entails infecting cattle with live Theileria sporozoites and co-treatment with long-acting tetracycline. Building on the ITM principle, the "Muguga"-cocktail ECF vaccine was developed in the 1970s and it remains the only commercially available-one. Although the vaccine induces cattle-protection, the vaccination approach still raises several drawbacks. Of those, the most outstanding is the vaccine-safety. This is implied because after ITM vaccination, cattle revert to T. parva pathogen reservoirs, therefore, during blood meal-acquisition, the ticks co-ingest T. parva pathogens. Ultimately, the pathogens are further transmitted transstadial; from larvae to nymph and nymph-adults and later re-transmitted to cattle during blood-meal acquisition. Consequently, the vaccine-constituting T. parva strains are introduced and (re) spread in non-endemic/ endemic areas. Precisely, rather than eradicating the disease, the ITM vaccination-approach promotes ECF endemicity. With advent of novel vaccination approaches toward vector and vector-borne disease control, ECF-control based on ITM of vaccination is considered outdated. The review highlights the need for embracing a holistic integrative vaccination approach entailing blocking Theileria pathogen-development and transmission both in the ticks and cattle, and/or the tick-population.
不使用基于感染与治疗方法(ITM)的疫苗,是否有可能通过阻断微小泰勒虫在蜱虫和牛体内的传播来控制东海岸热(ECF)?本综述探讨了这个问题。自阿诺德·泰勒(1912年)首次阐述天然ITM作为一种针对牛东海岸热疾病的疫苗接种方法以来,已经过去了100多年。该方法包括用活的微小泰勒虫子孢子感染牛,并同时使用长效四环素进行治疗。基于ITM原理,20世纪70年代开发了“穆古加”鸡尾酒式ECF疫苗,它仍然是唯一可商购的疫苗。尽管该疫苗能诱导牛产生保护作用,但这种疫苗接种方法仍存在一些缺点。其中,最突出的是疫苗安全性问题。这是因为在进行ITM疫苗接种后,牛会重新成为微小泰勒虫的病原体储存宿主,因此,在蜱虫吸食血液时,会同时摄入微小泰勒虫病原体。最终,病原体进一步经变态期传播;从幼虫传播到若虫,再从若虫传播到成虫,随后在蜱虫吸食血液时又传播回牛体内。因此,构成疫苗的微小泰勒虫菌株被引入并在非流行/流行地区(重新)传播。确切地说,ITM疫苗接种方法非但没有根除这种疾病,反而促进了东海岸热的地方流行性。随着针对媒介和媒介传播疾病控制的新型疫苗接种方法的出现,基于ITM的东海岸热疫苗接种控制方法被认为已经过时。本综述强调需要采用一种全面综合的疫苗接种方法,包括阻断微小泰勒虫病原体在蜱虫和牛体内以及/或者蜱虫种群中的发育和传播。