Kolb Lily M, Peters Gregory A, Cash Rebecca E, Ordoobadi Alexander J, Castellanos Mario J, Goldberg Scott A
The Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, 500 Hofstra Blvd., Hempstead, NY 11549, United States of America.
Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America; Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 125 Nashua Street, Suite 920, Boston, MA 02114, United States of America; Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America.
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Oct;84:158-161. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.07.063. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
Traumatic brain injury (TBIs) necessitates a rapid and comprehensive medical response to minimize secondary brain injury and reduce mortality. Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians serve a critical role in the management of prehospital TBI, responding during an initial phase of care with significant impact on patient outcomes. We used versions two and three of the Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) Prehospital Guidelines for the Management of Traumatic Brain Injury and the NASEMSO National Model Clinical Guidelines to determine key elements for a TBI prehospital protocol and included common factors across sources such as recommendations concerning patient monitoring, hypoxia, hypotension, hyperventilation, cerebral herniation, airway management, hyperosmolar therapy, and transport destination. We then conducted a cross-sectional evaluation of publicly available statewide EMS clinical protocols in the US to determine the degree of alignment with national guidelines. We calculated descriptive statistics for each factor in the state protocols. Despite adoption of some evidence-based recommendations for a standard approach to the prehospital management of patients with TBI, we found significant variability in statewide EMS treatment protocols for management of severe TBI, especially in the recommended frequency of patient reassessment and for the management of suspected herniation. Most statewide protocols provided guidance regarding oxygenation, ventilation, and blood pressure management that aligned with evidence-based guidelines. While most protocols did address management of oxygenation and ventilation, one in four protocols had no specific guidance for managing hypoxia and only 31% of protocols recommended avoiding hyperventilation. For the management of suspected cerebral herniation, over half of statewide protocols recommended hyperventilation, whereas only 31% explicitly advised against hyperventilation regardless of TBI severity. Interestingly, 94% of protocols do not mention the use of hyperosmolar therapy for TBI patients, neither recommending use or avoidance of hyperosmolar therapy. In conclusion, we found inconsistent adoption of national recommendations in available statewide protocols for prehospital TBI management. We identified significant gaps and variation in statewide protocols regarding patient monitoring and reassessment, as well as in several key areas of severe TBI management.
创伤性脑损伤(TBI)需要迅速而全面的医疗应对措施,以尽量减少继发性脑损伤并降低死亡率。紧急医疗服务(EMS)临床医生在院前TBI的管理中起着关键作用,在护理的初始阶段做出反应,对患者的预后有重大影响。我们使用了脑创伤基金会(BTF)创伤性脑损伤院前管理指南的第二版和第三版以及美国国家紧急医疗服务医师协会(NASEMSO)的国家示范临床指南,来确定TBI院前方案的关键要素,并纳入了不同来源的共同因素,如有关患者监测、缺氧、低血压、过度通气、脑疝、气道管理、高渗疗法和转运目的地的建议。然后,我们对美国公开的全州EMS临床方案进行了横断面评估,以确定与国家指南的一致程度。我们计算了各州方案中每个因素的描述性统计数据。尽管采用了一些基于证据的建议来规范TBI患者的院前管理标准方法,但我们发现,在全州范围内,严重TBI管理的EMS治疗方案存在显著差异,特别是在推荐的患者重新评估频率和疑似脑疝的管理方面。大多数全州方案提供了与基于证据的指南一致的关于氧合、通气和血压管理的指导。虽然大多数方案确实涉及氧合和通气的管理,但四分之一的方案没有关于管理缺氧的具体指导,只有31%的方案建议避免过度通气。对于疑似脑疝的管理,超过一半的全州方案推荐过度通气,而只有31%的方案明确建议无论TBI严重程度如何都应避免过度通气。有趣的是,94%的方案没有提及对TBI患者使用高渗疗法,既不推荐使用也不建议避免使用高渗疗法。总之,我们发现在现有的全州院前TBI管理方案中,对国家建议的采用不一致。我们确定了各州方案在患者监测和重新评估以及严重TBI管理的几个关键领域存在重大差距和差异。