Suppr超能文献

为什么护理专业的学生在临床实习中不报告工作场所欺凌行为:一项混合方法系统评价。

Why nursing students do not report workplace bullying during clinical practice: A mixed methods systematic review.

机构信息

Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China; College of Nursing, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.

Chengdu Fifth People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 2024 Nov;142:106341. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106341. Epub 2024 Aug 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Workplace bullying in clinical nurse education significantly threatens students' well-being and professional development. Despite its prevalence, many incidents go unreported, exacerbating the issue and compromising the quality of care. A significant gap exists in the literature regarding comprehensive mixed-methods systematic reviews on unreported bullying incidents among nursing students. This review aims to address this knowledge gap and propose effective strategies to tackle this pervasive problem.

AIM

This mixed-methods systematic review aimed to explore the factors influencing the non-reporting of workplace bullying incidents among nursing students during clinical practice.

DESIGN

Mixed-methods systematic review.

REVIEW METHODS AND DATA SOURCES

An extensive literature search was conducted across ten databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Chinese Biomedical, China National Knowledge Internet, and WANFANG, from database inception to November 1, 2023. Google Scholar and reference lists of included studies were also searched. Studies were selected based on eligibility criteria regarding population, phenomena of interest, and context. Two researchers independently assessed study quality, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Relevant data were extracted and synthesized using the Joanna Briggs Institute's convergent integrated approach, ensuring a comprehensive integration of qualitative and quantitative findings.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising six qualitative, twelve quantitative, and three mixed-methods studies. Four integrated themes emerged from nursing students' perspectives on reasons for not reporting workplace bullying during clinical practice: (i) fear and concerns related to reporting, (ii) concerns about professional image, (iii) barriers and challenges in reporting, and (iv) perceived ineffectiveness of reporting.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review provides valuable insights into nursing students' perspectives on the non-reporting of workplace bullying incidents during clinical practice. Understanding these reasons enables stakeholders to collaboratively develop interventions to create a safer and more supportive environment for nursing students, ultimately enhancing quality care and the well-being of healthcare professionals.

摘要

背景

临床护士教育中的工作场所欺凌严重威胁着学生的福祉和专业发展。尽管这种情况很普遍,但许多事件都未被报告,从而加剧了问题的严重性,并损害了护理质量。关于护理学生未报告的欺凌事件的综合混合方法系统评价,文献中存在很大的差距。本综述旨在弥补这一知识空白,并提出解决这一普遍问题的有效策略。

目的

本混合方法系统评价旨在探讨影响护理学生在临床实践中报告工作场所欺凌事件的因素。

设计

混合方法系统评价。

综述方法和数据来源

对包括 PubMed、Cochrane、Embase、Web of Science、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Scopus、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国国家知识基础设施和万方数据库在内的 10 个数据库进行了广泛的文献检索,检索时间为数据库建立至 2023 年 11 月 1 日。还检索了包括 Google Scholar 和纳入研究的参考文献在内的其他资源。根据纳入研究的人群、感兴趣的现象和背景的标准,选择了符合条件的研究。两名研究人员独立评估了研究质量,对于有分歧的研究由第三位评审员进行裁决。使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所的集中综合方法提取和综合相关数据,确保了定性和定量发现的全面综合。

结果

符合纳入标准的研究共有 21 项,包括 6 项定性研究、12 项定量研究和 3 项混合方法研究。从护理学生的角度出发,有四个综合主题出现了他们不报告临床实践中工作场所欺凌事件的原因:(一)报告相关的恐惧和担忧;(二)对专业形象的关注;(三)报告的障碍和挑战;以及(四)报告的效果不佳。

结论

本系统评价为护理学生在临床实践中不报告工作场所欺凌事件的原因提供了有价值的见解。了解这些原因使利益相关者能够共同制定干预措施,为护理学生创造更安全和更支持性的环境,最终提高护理质量和医疗保健专业人员的福祉。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验