Suppr超能文献

内镜超声检查在胰腺病变鉴别诊断中用于无对比增强的微血管成像。

Endoscopic ultrasonography for microvascular imaging without contrast enhancement in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic lesions.

作者信息

Yamashita Yasunobu, Yamazaki Hirofumi, Nakahata Akiya, Shimokawa Toshio, Tamura Takaaki, Kawaji Yuki, Tamura Takashi, Hatamaru Keiichi, Itonaga Masahiro, Ashida Reiko, Kitano Masayuki

机构信息

Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.

Clinical Study Support Center, Wakayama Medical University Hospital, Wakayama, Japan.

出版信息

Dig Endosc. 2025 Feb;37(2):192-198. doi: 10.1111/den.14889. Epub 2024 Aug 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Detective flow imaging endoscopic ultrasonography (DFI-EUS) is a recent imaging modality developed for detecting fine vessels without the need for ultrasound contrast agents. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the utility of DFI-EUS for solid pancreatic lesions and to compare the diagnostic ability for pancreatic cancer (PC) between DFI-EUS, directional power Doppler (eFLOW) EUS, and contrast-enhanced harmonic (CH)-EUS.

METHODS

Patients with a pancreatic lesion who underwent DFI-EUS, eFLOW-EUS, and CH-EUS between March 2019 and November 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. Final diagnoses were confirmed by pathologic examination of EUS-guided tissue acquisition and/or resected specimens. Lesions were categorized into the three patterns of poor, mild, and rich vascularity on DFI-EUS and eFLOW-EUS, and hypo-, iso-, and hypervascular on CH-EUS. PC was defined as a poor pattern on DFI-EUS and eFLOW-EUS, and a hypovascular pattern on CH-EUS.

RESULTS

The final diagnoses of 90 examined tumors were PC (n = 57), inflammatory mass (n = 6), autoimmune pancreatitis (n = 13), neuroendocrine tumor (n = 9), and others (n = 5). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for diagnosis of PC were 93%, 82%, and 88%, respectively, on DFI-EUS, 97%, 42%, and 77% on eFLOW-EUS, and 95%, 89%, and 92% on CH-EUS. The accuracy of DFI-EUS was significantly superior to eFLOW-EUS (P = 0.005), but no significant difference was found between DFI-EUS and CH-EUS.

CONCLUSION

DFI-EUS is more sensitive for depicting vasculature than eFLOW-EUS, and has higher diagnostic sensitivity for PC. Evaluation of vascularity on DFI-EUS is useful for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic lesions without the need for intravenous contrast agent.

摘要

目的

检测血流成像内镜超声检查(DFI-EUS)是一种最新开发的成像方式,无需超声造影剂即可检测微小血管。本研究的目的是评估DFI-EUS对胰腺实性病变的应用价值,并比较DFI-EUS、方向性功率多普勒(eFLOW)EUS和对比增强谐波(CH)-EUS对胰腺癌(PC)的诊断能力。

方法

回顾性纳入2019年3月至2023年11月期间接受DFI-EUS、eFLOW-EUS和CH-EUS检查的胰腺病变患者。最终诊断通过EUS引导下组织获取和/或切除标本的病理检查得以证实。在DFI-EUS和eFLOW-EUS上,病变被分为血管少、血管轻度丰富和血管丰富三种类型,在CH-EUS上分为低血供、等血供和高血供。PC被定义为在DFI-EUS和eFLOW-EUS上为血管少类型,在CH-EUS上为低血供类型。

结果

90例接受检查的肿瘤最终诊断为PC(n = 57)、炎性肿块(n = 6)、自身免疫性胰腺炎(n = 13)、神经内分泌肿瘤(n = 9)和其他(n = 5)。DFI-EUS诊断PC的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为93%、82%和88%,eFLOW-EUS分别为97%、42%和77%,CH-EUS分别为95%、89%和92%。DFI-EUS的准确性显著优于eFLOW-EUS(P = 0.005),但DFI-EUS与CH-EUS之间未发现显著差异。

结论

DFI-EUS在描绘血管方面比eFLOW-EUS更敏感,对PC具有更高的诊断敏感性。DFI-EUS上的血管评估对于胰腺病变的鉴别诊断有用,无需静脉注射造影剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验