• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挪威和丹麦的肺癌多学科团队会议:来自全国性调查和 MDT-MODe 观察的结果。

Multi-disciplinary team meetings for lung cancer in Norway and Denmark: results from national surveys and observations with MDT-MODe.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark.

Department of Pulmonology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Norway.

出版信息

Acta Oncol. 2024 Aug 11;63:678-684. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2024.40777.

DOI:10.2340/1651-226X.2024.40777
PMID:39129251
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11332478/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Multi-disciplinary Team (MDT) meetings are widely regarded as the 'gold standard' of lung cancer care. MDTs improve adherence to clinical guidelines for lung cancer patients. In this study, we describe and compare lung cancer MDTs in Denmark and Norway by combining national surveys and the MDT-Metric for the Observation of Decision-making (MDT-MODe) instrument.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Identical surveys were sent out to all lung cancer MDT centers in Denmark and Norway by the Danish Lung Cancer Group and the Norwegian Lung Cancer Group. Six MDT centers, three in Denmark and three in Norway, were observed using the MDT-MODe instrument.

RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION

We found similar organization of MDT meetings in both countries, with the main difference being more local MDT meetings in Norway. All lung cancer MDTs were chaired by respiratory physicians and attended by a radiologist. Other members included oncologists, pathologists, thoracic surgeons, specialist nurses, nuclear medicine specialists and junior doctors. Overall, members reported that they had sufficient time for preparation and attending MDT meetings. With the MDT-MODe instrument it was found that the MDT chairs, surgeons, oncologists, radiologists all contributed positively to case discussion. Comorbidities were included in the discussion of most patients while the patient's view and psychosocial issues were less often discussed. A treatment decision was reached in 79.7% of cases discussed. In conclusion, we found similar settings and overall good quality concerning lung cancer MDT meetings in Denmark and Norway.

摘要

背景与目的

多学科团队(MDT)会议被广泛认为是肺癌治疗的“金标准”。MDT 可提高对肺癌患者临床指南的依从性。本研究通过结合全国性调查和决策观察多学科工具(MDT-MODe)仪器,描述和比较丹麦和挪威的肺癌 MDT。

材料与方法

丹麦肺癌组和挪威肺癌组向丹麦和挪威所有肺癌 MDT 中心发送了相同的调查问卷。使用 MDT-MODe 仪器观察了六个 MDT 中心,其中三个在丹麦,三个在挪威。

结果与解释

我们发现两国 MDT 会议的组织方式相似,主要区别在于挪威的本地 MDT 会议更多。所有肺癌 MDT 均由呼吸科医生主持,并由放射科医生参加。其他成员包括肿瘤学家、病理学家、胸外科医生、专科护士、核医学专家和初级医生。总体而言,成员们报告说他们有足够的时间准备和参加 MDT 会议。使用 MDT-MODe 仪器发现,MDT 主席、外科医生、肿瘤学家、放射科医生都对病例讨论做出了积极贡献。大多数患者的合并症都在讨论范围内,而患者的观点和心理社会问题讨论较少。讨论的 79.7%的病例做出了治疗决策。总之,我们发现丹麦和挪威的肺癌 MDT 会议在设置和总体质量方面相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af2c/11332478/9fc2f771f5b5/AO-63-40777-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af2c/11332478/c21b731587fb/AO-63-40777-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af2c/11332478/9fc2f771f5b5/AO-63-40777-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af2c/11332478/c21b731587fb/AO-63-40777-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af2c/11332478/9fc2f771f5b5/AO-63-40777-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Multi-disciplinary team meetings for lung cancer in Norway and Denmark: results from national surveys and observations with MDT-MODe.挪威和丹麦的肺癌多学科团队会议:来自全国性调查和 MDT-MODe 观察的结果。
Acta Oncol. 2024 Aug 11;63:678-684. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2024.40777.
2
Educational Value of Surgical Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Learning Non-Technical Skills - A Pilot Survey of Trainees From Two UK Deaneries.外科多学科团队会议对于学习非技术技能的教育价值——来自两个英国教务长区学员的试点调查。
J Surg Educ. 2019 Jul-Aug;76(4):1034-1047. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
3
The role of oncologists in multidisciplinary cancer teams in the UK: an untapped resource for team leadership?英国多学科癌症团队中肿瘤学家的作用:团队领导的未开发资源?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Dec;17(6):1200-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01507.x. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
4
Investigating the efficiency of lung multi-disciplinary team meetings-A mixed methods study of eight lung multi-disciplinary teams.调查肺多学科团队会议的效率-对 8 个肺多学科团队的混合方法研究。
Cancer Med. 2023 Apr;12(8):9999-10007. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5730. Epub 2023 Mar 19.
5
Degrees of Multidisciplinarity Underpinning Care Planning for Patients with Cancer in Weekly Multidisciplinary Team Meetings: Conversation Analysis.每周多学科团队会议中癌症患者护理计划的多学科程度:会话分析
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Feb 18;14:411-424. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S270394. eCollection 2021.
6
Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings in practice: Results from a multi-institutional quantitative survey and implications for policy change.癌症多学科团队会议的实际情况:一项多机构定量调查的结果及对政策变革的启示。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb;14(1):74-83. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12765. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
7
Clinical impact of data feedback at lung cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: A mixed methods study.肺癌多学科团队会议中数据反馈的临床影响:一项混合方法研究。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb;16(1):45-55. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13278. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
8
Quality improvement in multidisciplinary cancer teams: an investigation of teamwork and clinical decision-making and cross-validation of assessments.多学科癌症团队的质量改进:对团队合作和临床决策的调查以及评估的交叉验证。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec;18(13):3535-43. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1773-5. Epub 2011 May 19.
9
Strategies to improve the efficiency and utility of multidisciplinary team meetings in urology cancer care: a survey study.提高泌尿外科癌症护理多学科团队会议效率和效用的策略:一项调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 8;14:377. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-377.
10
Development and evaluation of a checklist to support decision making in cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: MDT-QuIC.制定并评估一份检查表以支持癌症多学科团队会议中的决策:MDT-QuIC。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jun;19(6):1759-65. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2187-0. Epub 2011 Dec 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of multidisciplinary team discrepancies on comparative lung cancer outcome analyses and treatment equality.多学科团队差异对肺癌预后分析和治疗公平性的影响。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Nov 18;24(1):1423. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13188-4.
2
Factors behind favorable long-term lung cancer survival in Norway compared to Denmark: a retrospective cohort study.与丹麦相比,挪威肺癌长期生存良好的背后因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur Clin Respir J. 2024 Oct 9;11(1):2414485. doi: 10.1080/20018525.2024.2414485. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Multidisciplinary meeting review in nonsmall cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.多学科会议回顾在非小细胞肺癌中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Respir Rev. 2024 May 8;33(172). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0157-2023. Print 2024 Apr 30.
2
Implementation of streamlining measures in selecting and prioritising complex cases for the cancer multidisciplinary team meeting: a mini review of the recent developments.在为癌症多学科团队会议选择复杂病例并确定其优先级时实施简化措施:近期进展的简要综述
Front Health Serv. 2024 Mar 12;4:1340320. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1340320. eCollection 2024.
3
Contributions to Multidisciplinary Team Meetings in Cancer Care: Predictors of Complete Case Information and Comprehensive Case Discussions.
对癌症护理多学科团队会议的贡献:完整病例信息和全面病例讨论的预测因素。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Sep 4;14:2445-2452. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S309162. eCollection 2021.
4
A systematic review of colorectal multidisciplinary team meetings: an international comparison.结直肠多学科团队会议的系统评价:国际比较。
BJS Open. 2021 May 7;5(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab044.
5
A review on the impact of lung cancer multidisciplinary care on patient outcomes.肺癌多学科护理对患者预后影响的综述。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2020 Aug;9(4):1639-1653. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2019.11.03.
6
A multicentre cross-sectional observational study of cancer multidisciplinary teams: Analysis of team decision making.多中心横断面观察性研究癌症多学科团队:团队决策分析。
Cancer Med. 2020 Oct;9(19):7083-7099. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3366. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
7
Do multidisciplinary cancer care teams suffer decision-making fatigue: an observational, longitudinal team improvement study.多学科癌症护理团队是否会遭受决策疲劳:一项观察性、纵向的团队改进研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 27;9(5):e027303. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027303.
8
Analysing Breast Cancer Multidisciplinary Patient Management: A Prospective Observational Evaluation of Team Clinical Decision-Making.分析乳腺癌多学科患者管理:团队临床决策的前瞻性观察性评估。
World J Surg. 2019 Feb;43(2):559-566. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4815-3.
9
Benefits, barriers and opinions on multidisciplinary team meetings: a survey in Swedish cancer care.多学科团队会议的益处、障碍及看法:瑞典癌症护理领域的一项调查
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 5;18(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2990-4.
10
Successful strategies in implementing a multidisciplinary team working in the care of patients with cancer: an overview and synthesis of the available literature.实施多学科团队护理癌症患者的成功策略:现有文献综述与综合分析
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018 Jan 19;11:49-61. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S117945. eCollection 2018.