Comparison between Manuka Honey and Baby Shampoo Nasal Douching Procedures After Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: a Prospective Comparative.

INTRODUCTION

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of nasal and paranasal sinus mucosa where symptomatology has continued beyond 12 weeks. Manuka honey is made by bees that pollinate the native leptospermum scoparium bush (tea tree). Baby shampoo is a commercially available liquid solution containing multiple chemical surfactants that can act as a mucolytic and an antimicrobial agent.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty patients diagnosed with CRS were taken to be part of study. The modes of comparison used were the Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI) and a self-formulated Nasal Crusting Score (NCS). Individuals in Group A were given 5% Manuka Honey for nasal douching in both nasal cavities and those in Group B were given 10% Baby Shampoo.

OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS

The average RSDI scores in Group A before & after intervention were 75.40 and 30.04, an improvement of 60.15%. The same parameters in Group B was found to be 77.36 and 37.36, an improvement of 51.70%. The NCS improved by 83.46% in the Group A and by 77.61% in Group B between POD-2 and POD-5.

CONCLUSION

As per literature available, both Manuka Honey and Baby Shampoo have improved the outcomes of Quality of Life and airway after FESS. We found that Manuka Honey is superior in clearing crusts and achieving better symptom clearance post FESS. We also present our self-formulated Nasal Crusting Score which can be used in further practice for better understanding of nasal airway.