• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众认知与生态质量状况:审视孔戈斯特河环境的生态恢复

Public perception vs ecological quality status: Examining the ecological restoration of the Congost River's Environment.

作者信息

Zaldo-Aubanell Quim, Mas-Ponce Antoni, Asbert Guiu, Clota Berta, Isnard Manel, Proia Lorenzo, Bach Albert, Sànchez Mateo Sònia

机构信息

BETA Technological Center, University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia (UVic-UCC), Vic, Spain.

Forest Science and Technology Centre of Catalonia (CTFC), Solsona, Spain.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Jul 14;10(14):e34615. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34615. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34615
PMID:39130423
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11315083/
Abstract

This study examines the public's perceptions of the ecological restoration of the Congost River over the past thirty years, focusing on the period between 2010 and 2022. We conducted a survey of 112 river users across five key zones identified through a pilot study for their high pedestrian density, aiming to analyse how different sociodemographic groups perceive the river's ecological state. A structured questionnaire was distributed along both sides of the river to engage a diverse range of individuals typically utilizing the river environment. The collected data were analysed using regression models and Mann-Whitney U tests to assess differences between groups, with Bonferroni adjustments applied to control for multiple comparisons. The results reveal a broad increase in appreciation for the river since 2010, alongside measurable ecological improvements supported by scientific data. Despite these positive changes, a majority of surveyed users remain sceptical about the river's recovery, with less pronounced scepticism among older respondents, those with higher education, and environmental volunteers. These groups' perceptions align more closely with empirical evidence, highlighting the influence of sociodemographic factors on environmental awareness. Individuals living closer to natural settings and frequent river visitors were found to be more attuned to changes in the river's environment, particularly in aesthetic and sensory aspects. The study underscores the persistence of a perceptual gap between scientific assessments of ecological health and public sentiment, emphasizing the complex relationship between community perceptions and objective environmental indicators. These insights underline the complex relationship between community perceptions and objective environmental indicators, reflecting a broader trend in environmental awareness and the importance of factual communication in ecological issues.

摘要

本研究考察了过去三十年来公众对孔戈斯特河生态恢复的看法,重点关注2010年至2022年期间。我们对通过初步研究确定的五个关键区域的112名河流使用者进行了调查,这些区域行人密度高,旨在分析不同社会人口群体如何看待河流的生态状况。一份结构化问卷在河两岸发放,以接触通常利用河流环境的不同人群。使用回归模型和曼-惠特尼U检验对收集到的数据进行分析,以评估组间差异,并应用邦费罗尼校正来控制多重比较。结果显示,自2010年以来,人们对这条河的欣赏程度普遍提高,同时有科学数据支持的可衡量的生态改善。尽管有这些积极变化,但大多数接受调查的使用者对河流的恢复仍持怀疑态度,在老年受访者、受过高等教育的人和环境志愿者中,怀疑态度不太明显。这些群体的看法与实证证据更为一致,突出了社会人口因素对环境意识的影响。发现居住在更靠近自然环境的人和经常光顾河流的人对河流环境的变化更敏感,特别是在美学和感官方面。该研究强调了生态健康的科学评估与公众情绪之间的认知差距依然存在,强调了社区认知与客观环境指标之间的复杂关系。这些见解突显了社区认知与客观环境指标之间的复杂关系,反映了环境意识方面的更广泛趋势以及在生态问题中进行事实沟通的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b58/11315083/a28597bacbd0/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b58/11315083/d9e21997a1c7/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b58/11315083/a28597bacbd0/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b58/11315083/d9e21997a1c7/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b58/11315083/a28597bacbd0/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Public perception vs ecological quality status: Examining the ecological restoration of the Congost River's Environment.公众认知与生态质量状况:审视孔戈斯特河环境的生态恢复
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 14;10(14):e34615. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34615. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.
2
The social dimensions of a river's environmental quality assessment.河流环境质量评估的社会层面。
Ambio. 2019 Apr;48(4):409-422. doi: 10.1007/s13280-018-1089-9. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
3
An environmental flow assessment of a river's blocking effect on a lake in a river-lake system: application in the Yangtze-Poyang system.河流-湖泊系统中河流阻断对湖泊的环境水流评估:在长江-鄱阳湖系统中的应用。
Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Jul 7;190(8):453. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-6825-x.
4
Comparative analysis of water quality index and river classification in Kereh River, Penang, Malaysia: Impact of untreated swine wastewater from Kampung Selamat pig farms.马来西亚槟城凯立河的水质指标和河流分类的比较分析:甘榜斯里马养猪场未经处理的猪污水的影响。
Water Environ Res. 2024 Aug;96(8):e11095. doi: 10.1002/wer.11095.
5
Development and preliminary application of a method to assess river ecological status in the Hai River Basin, north China.中国北方海河流域河流生态状况评估方法的开发与初步应用
J Environ Sci (China). 2016 Jan;39:144-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
6
Pollution in river tributaries restricts the water quality of ecological water replenishment in the Baiyangdian watershed, China.中国白洋淀流域支流的污染限制了生态补水的水质。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(18):51556-51570. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25957-y. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
7
Long-term river management legacies strongly alter riparian forest attributes and constrain restoration strategies along a large, multi-use river.长期的河流管理遗留问题强烈改变了河岸林的属性,并限制了沿一条大型多用途河流的恢复策略。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Feb 1;279:111630. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111630. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
8
A Critical Review of the Crucial Role of the Yellow River's Sediment in the Interfacial Migration and Fate of Pollutants and Prospects for the Application of Environmental Sediment Restoration.黄河泥沙在污染物界面迁移与归宿中的关键作用及环境底泥修复应用前景的批判性综述
Toxics. 2024 Sep 14;12(9):669. doi: 10.3390/toxics12090669.
9
Predicting future river health in a minimally influenced mountainous area under climate change.预测气候变化下受最小人为影响的山区未来河流健康状况。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Mar 15;656:1373-1385. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.430. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
10
Combining metal and sulfate isotopes measurements to identify different anthropogenic impacts on dissolved heavy metals levels in river water.结合金属和硫酸盐同位素测量,识别河水溶解态重金属水平受不同人为活动的影响。
Chemosphere. 2023 Jan;310:136747. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136747. Epub 2022 Oct 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping environmental perceptions in Romania: A mixed-methods research.罗马尼亚环境认知图谱:一项混合方法研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 29;10(23):e40845. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40845. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Evolving norms: social media data analysis on parks and greenspaces perception changes before and after the COVID 19 pandemic using a machine learning approach.演变中的规范:使用机器学习方法分析新冠疫情前后公众对公园和绿地感知变化的社交媒体数据
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 2;12(1):13246. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17077-3.
2
Perceptions of green space usage, abundance, and quality of green space were associated with better mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic among residents of Denver.在科罗拉多州丹佛市,居民对绿色空间的使用、丰富度和质量的看法与大流行期间的心理健康状况呈正相关。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 2;17(3):e0263779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263779. eCollection 2022.
3
A global agenda for advancing freshwater biodiversity research.
推进淡水生物多样性研究的全球议程。
Ecol Lett. 2022 Feb;25(2):255-263. doi: 10.1111/ele.13931. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
4
Does greenery experienced indoors and outdoors provide an escape and support mental health during the COVID-19 quarantine?在 COVID-19 隔离期间,室内和室外的绿色环境是否能提供一种逃避和支持心理健康的方式?
Environ Res. 2021 May;196:110420. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110420. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
5
Lakes in the era of global change: moving beyond single-lake thinking in maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem services.全球变化时代的湖泊:超越单湖思维,维护生物多样性和生态系统服务
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2021 Feb;96(1):89-106. doi: 10.1111/brv.12647. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
6
Bending the Curve of Global Freshwater Biodiversity Loss: An Emergency Recovery Plan.扭转全球淡水生物多样性丧失的趋势:一项紧急恢复计划。
Bioscience. 2020 Apr 1;70(4):330-342. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biaa002. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
7
Understanding rivers and their social relations: A critical step to advance environmental water management.理解河流及其社会关系:推进环境水管理的关键一步。
WIREs Water. 2019;6(6). doi: 10.1002/wat2.1381.
8
Does the number of response options matter? Psychometric perspectives using personality questionnaire data.反应选项的数量是否重要?使用人格问卷数据的心理计量学视角。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Apr;31(4):557-566. doi: 10.1037/pas0000648. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
9
The harmonic mean -value for combining dependent tests.合并相关检验的调和平均值。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jan 22;116(4):1195-1200. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1814092116. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
10
Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity.淡水生物多样性面临的新威胁和持续的保护挑战。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2019 Jun;94(3):849-873. doi: 10.1111/brv.12480. Epub 2018 Nov 22.