Department of Hygiene, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Institute for Highway Engineering and Transport Planning, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Environ Res. 2021 May;196:110420. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110420. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly changed people's ability to recreate in public green spaces, which is likely to exacerbate the psychological impacts of the pandemic. In the current study, we seek to understand whether greenery can support mental health even with insufficient outdoor exposure in times of physical isolation from the outdoor environment.
Between 17 May and 10 June, 2020, we conducted an online survey among 323 students (21.99 ± 3.10 years; 31% male) in health-related programs from two universities in the city of Plovdiv, Bulgaria. Severities of depressive and anxiety symptoms over the past two weeks were measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale. We employed two self-reported measures of greenery experienced indoors (number of houseplants in the home and proportion of exterior greenery visible from inside the home) and two measures of greenery experienced outdoors (presence/absence of a domestic garden and availability of neighborhood greenery). Restorative quality of the home (the "being away" dimension of the Perceived Restorativeness Scale; PRS) and the neighborhood (the "being away" and "fascination" dimensions of the PRS), engagement with outdoor greenery (frequency of different types of interaction) and perceived social support were treated as mediators. Associations between greenery and mental health were tested using generalized linear regression and logistic regression. Structural equation modelling (SEM) techniques were used to test the theoretically-indicated relations among the variables.
Clinically-meaningful symptoms of moderate depression and anxiety were reported by approximately 33% and 20% of the students, respectively. The relative abundance of greenery visible from the home or in the neighborhood was associated with reduced depressive/anxiety symptoms and lower depression/anxiety rates. Having more houseplants or a garden was also associated with some of these markers of mental health. As hypothesized, the mental health-supportive effects of indoor greenery were largely explained by increased feelings of being away while at home. Neighborhood greenery contributed to neighborhood restorative quality, which in turn facilitated social support and more frequent engagement with greenery, and that led to better mental health.
Students who spent most of their time at home during the COVID-19 epidemic experienced better mental health when exposed to more greenery. Our findings support the idea that exposure to greenery may be a valuable resource during social isolation in the home. However, causal interpretation of these associations is not straightforward.
COVID-19 大流行深刻改变了人们在公共绿地中娱乐的能力,这可能会加剧大流行带来的心理影响。在本研究中,我们试图了解在与户外环境物理隔离的时期,即使户外活动不足,绿色环境是否仍能支持心理健康。
2020 年 5 月 17 日至 6 月 10 日,我们在保加利亚普罗夫迪夫市两所大学的健康相关专业的 323 名学生(21.99±3.10 岁;31%为男性)中进行了在线调查。使用患者健康问卷 9 项和广泛性焦虑症 7 项量表评估过去两周的抑郁和焦虑症状严重程度。我们采用了两种室内绿色环境体验的自我报告测量方法(家中的植物数量和从家中可见的外部绿色植物比例)和两种室外绿色环境体验的测量方法(家中是否有花园和周围是否有绿地)。家庭的恢复质量(感知恢复性量表的“离开”维度;PRS)和邻里(PRS 的“离开”和“着迷”维度)、与户外绿色环境的互动频率(不同类型的互动频率)和感知社会支持被视为中介因素。使用广义线性回归和逻辑回归测试绿色环境与心理健康之间的关联。结构方程模型(SEM)技术用于测试变量之间的理论关联。
大约 33%和 20%的学生报告了有临床意义的中度抑郁和焦虑症状。从家中或周围可见的绿色环境的相对丰富程度与抑郁/焦虑症状减轻和抑郁/焦虑发生率降低有关。家中有更多植物或花园也与这些心理健康标志物有关。正如假设的那样,室内绿色环境的心理健康支持作用在很大程度上可以解释为在家时感觉更“离开”。邻里绿色环境有助于邻里恢复质量,进而促进社会支持和更多地与绿色环境互动,从而改善心理健康。
在 COVID-19 流行期间,大部分时间待在家里的学生接触更多的绿色环境时,心理健康状况更好。我们的发现支持这样一种观点,即暴露于绿色环境可能是家庭隔离期间的宝贵资源。然而,这些关联的因果解释并不简单。