Suppr超能文献

评估ChatGPT对全髋关节和膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染常见患者问题的回答。

Evaluating ChatGPT responses to frequently asked patient questions regarding periprosthetic joint infection after total hip and knee arthroplasty.

作者信息

Hu Xiaojun, Niemann Marcel, Kienzle Arne, Braun Karl, Back David Alexander, Gwinner Clemens, Renz Nora, Stoeckle Ulrich, Trampuz Andrej, Meller Sebastian

机构信息

Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.

Department of Orthopedics, Seventh People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2024 Aug 9;10:20552076241272620. doi: 10.1177/20552076241272620. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients access relevant information concerning their orthopaedic surgery resources through multiple information channels before presenting for clinical treatment. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI)-powered chatbots have become another source of information for patients. The currently developed AI chat technology ChatGPT (OpenAI LP) is an application for such purposes and it has been rapidly gaining popularity, including for patient education. This study sought to evaluate whether ChatGPT can correctly answer frequently asked questions (FAQ) regarding periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

METHODS

Twelve FAQs about PJI after hip and knee arthroplasty were identified from the websites of fifteen international clinical expert centres. ChatGPT was confronted with these questions and its responses were analysed for their accuracy using an evidence-based approach by a multidisciplinary team. Responses were categorised in four groups: (1) Excellent response that did not require additional improvement; (2) Satisfactory responses that required a small amount of improvement; (3) Satisfactory responses that required moderate improvement; and (4) Unsatisfactory responses that required a large amount of improvement.

RESULTS

From the analysis of the responses given by the chatbot, no reply received an 'unsatisfactory' rating; one did not require any correction; and the majority of the responses required low (7 out of 12) or moderate (4 out of 12) clarification. Although a few responses required minimal clarification, the chatbot responses were generally unbiased and evidence-based, even when asked controversial questions.

CONCLUSIONS

The AI-chatbot ChatGPT was able to effectively answer the FAQs of patients seeking information around PJI diagnosis and treatment. The given information was also written in a manner that can be assumed to be understandable by patients. The chatbot could be a valuable clinical tool for patient education and understanding around PJI treatment in the future. Further studies should evaluate its use and acceptance by patients with PJI.

摘要

背景

患者在接受临床治疗前会通过多种信息渠道获取有关骨科手术资源的相关信息。最近,人工智能(AI)驱动的聊天机器人已成为患者的另一个信息来源。当前开发的人工智能聊天技术ChatGPT(OpenAI LP)就是用于此类目的的应用程序,并且它已迅速受到欢迎,包括用于患者教育。本研究旨在评估ChatGPT是否能够正确回答有关假体周围关节感染(PJI)的常见问题(FAQ)。

方法

从15个国际临床专家中心的网站上确定了12个关于髋膝关节置换术后PJI的常见问题。让ChatGPT回答这些问题,并由一个多学科团队采用循证方法分析其回答的准确性。回答分为四组:(1)无需进一步改进的优秀回答;(2)需要少量改进的满意回答;(3)需要适度改进的满意回答;(4)需要大量改进的不满意回答。

结果

通过对聊天机器人给出的回答进行分析,没有一个回答获得“不满意”评级;一个回答无需任何修正;大多数回答需要低程度(12个中的7个)或适度程度(12个中的4个)的澄清。尽管有少数回答需要最少的澄清,但聊天机器人的回答总体上是无偏见且基于证据的,即使被问到有争议的问题时也是如此。

结论

人工智能聊天机器人ChatGPT能够有效回答寻求PJI诊断和治疗信息的患者的常见问题。所提供的信息也是以患者可以理解的方式编写的。该聊天机器人未来可能成为患者教育和理解PJI治疗的有价值的临床工具。进一步的研究应评估PJI患者对其的使用和接受情况。

相似文献

1
Evaluating ChatGPT responses to frequently asked patient questions regarding periprosthetic joint infection after total hip and knee arthroplasty.
Digit Health. 2024 Aug 9;10:20552076241272620. doi: 10.1177/20552076241272620. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Assessing ChatGPT Responses to Common Patient Questions Regarding Total Hip Arthroplasty.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 Oct 4;105(19):1519-1526. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.00209. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
3
Can ChatGPT Answer Patient Questions Regarding Total Knee Arthroplasty?
J Knee Surg. 2024 Jul;37(9):664-673. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1782233. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
5
An Artificial Intelligence Chatbot is an Accurate and Useful Online Patient Resource Prior to Total Knee Arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Aug;39(8S1):S358-S362. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.02.005. Epub 2024 Feb 11.
6
ChatGPT Responses to Common Questions About Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: A Reliable Resource for Parents?
J Pediatr Orthop. 2024 Jul 1;44(6):353-357. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002681. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
8
Performance of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots on Glaucoma Questions Adapted From Patient Brochures.
Cureus. 2024 Mar 23;16(3):e56766. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56766. eCollection 2024 Mar.
9
Evaluating ChatGPT's Ability to Answer Common Patient Questions Regarding Hip Fracture.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024 Jul 15;32(14):656-659. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00877. Epub 2024 May 14.

本文引用的文献

3
Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis: A Narrative Review.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Sep 27;12(10):1485. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12101485.
5
Unraveling the Ethical Enigma: Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare.
Cureus. 2023 Aug 10;15(8):e43262. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43262. eCollection 2023 Aug.
9
Assessing ChatGPT Responses to Common Patient Questions Regarding Total Hip Arthroplasty.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 Oct 4;105(19):1519-1526. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.00209. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
10
Voriconazole Admixed with PMMA-Impact on Mechanical Properties and Efficacy.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 May 4;12(5):848. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12050848.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验