Nathan Sandeep, Basir Mir B
University of Chicago Medicine, Heart and Vascular Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Dec 4;2(6Part B):101210. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101210. eCollection 2023 Nov-Dec.
While the existence of cardiorenal perturbations has been known for nearly 2 centuries, only in the past 2 decades has significant progress been made in classifying these alterations and characterizing the pathobiology and hemodynamic signature of cardiorenal syndrome (CRS). Empiric intravenous diuretic therapy with fluid and sodium restriction and selective use of vasoactive agents have remained cornerstones of managing acute heart failure with or without acute CRS; however, recent clinical data has exposed the shortcomings of this approach. The traditional view of CRS has long focused on low cardiac output with resultant renal arterial hypoperfusion as the central hemodynamic derangement but this too, has been challenged by new preclinical and clinical observations. Renal venous congestion/hypertension has since been identified as an important hemodynamic contributor to the development of CRS, resulting in diminished renal perfusion pressure, defined as the difference between arterial driving pressure and renal venous pressure. Novel circulatory renal assist devices for the treatment of acute (type I) CRS are in development and may be divided into 2 broad categories: "pushers" which aim to improve renal arterial perfusion (renal preload) and "pullers" which are designed to reduce renal venous congestion (renal afterload). Numerous devices have shown promise in early-stage clinical studies but none have been approved yet for commercial use in the United States. The value of CRS device therapies will ultimately rest on safety as well as the ability of these devices to effect predictable, meaningful, and durable improvements in renal function along with clinical and hemodynamic markers of congestion.
虽然心肾紊乱的存在已为人所知近两个世纪,但仅在过去20年里,在对这些改变进行分类以及描述心肾综合征(CRS)的病理生物学和血流动力学特征方面才取得了重大进展。经验性静脉利尿剂治疗、液体和钠限制以及血管活性药物的选择性使用一直是治疗伴有或不伴有急性CRS的急性心力衰竭的基石;然而,最近的临床数据揭示了这种方法的缺点。CRS的传统观点长期以来一直将低心输出量以及由此导致的肾动脉灌注不足视为主要的血流动力学紊乱,但这一观点也受到了新的临床前和临床观察结果的挑战。此后,肾静脉淤血/高血压已被确定为CRS发展的一个重要血流动力学因素,导致肾灌注压降低,肾灌注压定义为动脉驱动压与肾静脉压之间的差值。用于治疗急性(I型)CRS的新型循环肾辅助装置正在研发中,可大致分为两大类:旨在改善肾动脉灌注(肾前负荷)的“推流器”和旨在减轻肾静脉淤血(肾后负荷)的“拉流器”。许多装置在早期临床研究中已显示出前景,但在美国尚无一种获得商业使用批准。CRS装置疗法的价值最终将取决于安全性以及这些装置能否对肾功能以及淤血的临床和血流动力学指标产生可预测、有意义且持久的改善。