• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机械循环支持在复杂高危及有指征的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的作用:当前适应证、设备选择及潜在并发症

Role of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Complex High-Risk and Indicated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Current Indications, Device Options, and Potential Complications.

作者信息

Di Muro Francesca Maria, Bellino Michele, Esposito Luca, Attisano Tiziana, Meucci Francesco, Mattesini Alessio, Galasso Gennaro, Vecchione Carmine, Di Mario Carlo

机构信息

Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, School of Human Health Sciences, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.

Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Baronissi, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 21;13(16):4931. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164931.

DOI:10.3390/jcm13164931
PMID:39201073
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11355104/
Abstract

Improved expertise and technological advancements have enabled the safe and effective performance of complex and high-risk-indicated percutaneous coronary intervention (CHIP) in patients previously considered inoperable or high-risk. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices play a crucial role in stabilizing hemodynamics during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) -related ischemia, thereby reducing the risk of major adverse events and achieving a more complete revascularization. However, the use of MCS devices in protected PCI is not without risks, including peri-procedural myocardial infarction (MI), bleeding, and access-related complications. Despite numerous observational studies, there is a significant lack of randomized clinical trials comparing different MCS devices in various CHIP scenarios and evaluating their long-term safety and efficacy profiles. This review aims to summarize the current evidence regarding the benefits of MCS devices during CHIPs, offer a practical guide for selecting appropriate devices based on clinical scenarios, and highlight the unanswered questions that future trials need to address.

摘要

专业知识的提高和技术进步使得在以前被认为无法手术或高风险的患者中安全有效地进行复杂且具有高风险指征的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(CHIP)成为可能。机械循环支持(MCS)设备在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)相关缺血期间稳定血流动力学方面发挥着关键作用,从而降低主要不良事件的风险并实现更完全的血管重建。然而,在受保护的PCI中使用MCS设备并非没有风险,包括围手术期心肌梗死(MI)、出血和与通路相关的并发症。尽管有大量观察性研究,但在各种CHIP情况下比较不同MCS设备并评估其长期安全性和疗效的随机临床试验严重缺乏。本综述旨在总结当前关于MCS设备在CHIP期间益处的证据,提供基于临床情况选择合适设备的实用指南,并突出未来试验需要解决的未回答问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13e5/11355104/6e02e157d523/jcm-13-04931-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13e5/11355104/2e6ea5ca32cf/jcm-13-04931-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13e5/11355104/6e02e157d523/jcm-13-04931-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13e5/11355104/2e6ea5ca32cf/jcm-13-04931-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13e5/11355104/6e02e157d523/jcm-13-04931-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Role of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Complex High-Risk and Indicated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Current Indications, Device Options, and Potential Complications.机械循环支持在复杂高危及有指征的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的作用:当前适应证、设备选择及潜在并发症
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 21;13(16):4931. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164931.
2
Mechanical Circulatory Support for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.机械循环支持在高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024 Apr;26(4):233-244. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02029-2. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
3
Mechanical Circulatory Support in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的机械循环支持。
Interv Cardiol Clin. 2021 Apr;10(2):207-219. doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2020.12.002. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
4
Safety and efficacy of mechanical circulatory support with Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and/or cardiogenic shock: Insights from a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.机械循环支持联合 Impella 或主动脉内球囊泵在高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和/或心源性休克中的安全性和疗效:来自随机试验网络荟萃分析的见解。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Apr 1;97(5):E636-E645. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29236. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
5
Utilization of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction and High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.经皮机械循环支持装置在急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克及高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用
J Clin Med. 2019 Aug 13;8(8):1209. doi: 10.3390/jcm8081209.
6
Percutaneous coronary intervention with Impella support with and without intra-aortic balloon in cardiogenic shock patients.在心源休克患者中,使用和不使用主动脉内球囊的情况下,采用Impella支持进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 Oct;55:68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.04.002. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
7
High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Native Coronary Arteries Without Mechanical Circulatory Support in Acute Coronary Syndrome Without Cardiogenic Shock.急性冠状动脉综合征无休克患者中行非机械循环支持的高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术治疗原生冠状动脉。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Nov 1;158:37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.07.014. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
8
Mechanical circulatory support versus vasopressors alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.机械循环支持与单独使用血管加压素在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者中的比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jan;103(1):30-41. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30913. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
9
High-Risk "Protected" Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Mechanical Circulatory Support in a Non-Surgical Center - An Early Asian Experience.非手术中心采用机械循环支持的高风险“保护性”经皮冠状动脉介入治疗——亚洲早期经验
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2020 Nov;36(6):675-680. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202011_36(6).20200810A.
10
Balancing benefit against risk in the choice of therapy for coronary artery disease. Lesson from prospective, randomized, clinical trials of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery.冠状动脉疾病治疗选择中风险与获益的权衡。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术前瞻性随机临床试验的经验教训。
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2003 Oct;51(5):585-97.

引用本文的文献

1
Functional Mitral Regurgitation in the Transcatheter Era: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Pathways.经导管时代的功能性二尖瓣反流:诊断与治疗途径
J Pers Med. 2025 Aug 13;15(8):372. doi: 10.3390/jpm15080372.
2
Clinical outcomes after complex and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention according to baseline chronic kidney disease.根据基线慢性肾脏病情况,复杂高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的临床结局
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Feb 25. doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02618-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Ejection Fraction Improvement Following Contemporary High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: RESTORE EF Study Results.当代高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后射血分数的改善:RESTORE EF研究结果
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Aug 13;1(5):100350. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100350. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.
2
High-risk PCI facilitated by levosimendan infusion and Impella CP support in ACS cohort-pilot study.
Kardiol Pol. 2024;82(7-8):771-773. doi: 10.33963/v.phj.100689. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
3
Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided large-bore femoral access in PCI of complex coronary lesions: the international, multicentre, randomised ULTRACOLOR Trial.超声引导与透视引导在复杂冠状动脉病变 PCI 中的大腔股动脉入路:国际多中心随机 ULTRACOLOR 试验。
EuroIntervention. 2024 Jul 15;20(14):e876-e886. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00089.
4
Best practices for vascular arterial access and closure: a contemporary guide for the cardiac catheterization laboratory.血管动脉通路与闭合的最佳实践:心脏导管实验室当代指南
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Mar 14;11:1349480. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1349480. eCollection 2024.
5
The use of mechanical circulatory support in elective high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions: a literature-based review.机械循环支持在择期高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用:基于文献的综述
Eur Heart J Open. 2024 Feb 9;4(2):oeae007. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae007. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
The impact of ECPELLA on haemodynamics and global oxygen delivery: a comprehensive simulation of biventricular failure.体外膜肺氧合辅助经皮左心室辅助装置(ECPELLA)对血流动力学和整体氧输送的影响:双心室衰竭的综合模拟
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2024 Feb 16;12(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40635-024-00599-7.
7
2022 Joint ESC/EACTS review of the 2018 guideline recommendations on the revascularization of left main coronary artery disease in patients at low surgical risk and anatomy suitable for PCI or CABG.2022 年 ESC/EACTS 联合对 2018 年指南建议的回顾:低手术风险且适合 PCI 或 CABG 解剖结构的左主干冠状动脉疾病患者的血运重建。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Nov 1;44(41):4310-4320. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad476.
8
2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes.2023年欧洲心脏病学会急性冠状动脉综合征管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-3826. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191.
9
Management of Bleeding and Hemolysis During Percutaneous Microaxial Flow Pump Support: A Practical Approach.经皮微轴流泵支持治疗期间出血和溶血的管理:一种实用方法。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jul 24;16(14):1707-1720. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.05.043.
10
Roadmap towards an institutional Impella programme for high-risk coronary interventions.高危冠状动脉介入治疗的 Impella 项目实施路线图。
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Aug;10(4):2200-2213. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14397. Epub 2023 Jun 21.