Di Muro Francesca Maria, Bellino Michele, Esposito Luca, Attisano Tiziana, Meucci Francesco, Mattesini Alessio, Galasso Gennaro, Vecchione Carmine, Di Mario Carlo
Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, School of Human Health Sciences, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Baronissi, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 21;13(16):4931. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164931.
Improved expertise and technological advancements have enabled the safe and effective performance of complex and high-risk-indicated percutaneous coronary intervention (CHIP) in patients previously considered inoperable or high-risk. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices play a crucial role in stabilizing hemodynamics during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) -related ischemia, thereby reducing the risk of major adverse events and achieving a more complete revascularization. However, the use of MCS devices in protected PCI is not without risks, including peri-procedural myocardial infarction (MI), bleeding, and access-related complications. Despite numerous observational studies, there is a significant lack of randomized clinical trials comparing different MCS devices in various CHIP scenarios and evaluating their long-term safety and efficacy profiles. This review aims to summarize the current evidence regarding the benefits of MCS devices during CHIPs, offer a practical guide for selecting appropriate devices based on clinical scenarios, and highlight the unanswered questions that future trials need to address.
专业知识的提高和技术进步使得在以前被认为无法手术或高风险的患者中安全有效地进行复杂且具有高风险指征的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(CHIP)成为可能。机械循环支持(MCS)设备在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)相关缺血期间稳定血流动力学方面发挥着关键作用,从而降低主要不良事件的风险并实现更完全的血管重建。然而,在受保护的PCI中使用MCS设备并非没有风险,包括围手术期心肌梗死(MI)、出血和与通路相关的并发症。尽管有大量观察性研究,但在各种CHIP情况下比较不同MCS设备并评估其长期安全性和疗效的随机临床试验严重缺乏。本综述旨在总结当前关于MCS设备在CHIP期间益处的证据,提供基于临床情况选择合适设备的实用指南,并突出未来试验需要解决的未回答问题。