种植修复体中用于封闭副根管的修复材料的细菌黏附与微渗漏
Bacterial adhesion and microleakage of restorative materials for sealing accessory canals in implant prosthesis.
作者信息
Rathod Vishal, Gujjarlapudi Satish, Kaul Sridevi, Saraf Sneha, Sharma Deepak, Kharat Neetu
机构信息
Department of Prosthodontics Crown and Bridge, Faculty of Dental Science, Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadiad, Gujarat, India.
Familia dental, 804 S Green River road, Evansville, IN 47715.
出版信息
Bioinformation. 2024 Jun 30;20(6):678-682. doi: 10.6026/973206300200678. eCollection 2024.
Abstract
The level of bacterial adhesion and bacterial microleakage in four different materials utilised to seal the access passage of screw retained implant supported prosthesis (SRIP) is of interest to dentists. Four distinct categories were created from the samples on the basis of restorative materials used for sealing access passage in SRIP. Guttapercha and light cured acrylic resin were found to have comparatively low bacterial adhesion and bacterial microleakage in sealing accessory canals in screw retained implant supported prosthesis.
摘要
牙科医生对用于密封螺丝固位种植体支持修复体（SRIP）通路的四种不同材料的细菌黏附水平和细菌微渗漏情况很感兴趣。根据用于密封SRIP通路的修复材料，从样本中创建了四个不同的类别。在密封螺丝固位种植体支持修复体的副根管时，发现牙胶和光固化丙烯酸树脂的细菌黏附和细菌微渗漏相对较低。
相似文献
1
Bacterial adhesion and microleakage of restorative materials for sealing accessory canals in implant prosthesis.种植修复体中用于封闭副根管的修复材料的细菌黏附与微渗漏
Bioinformation. 2024 Jun 30;20(6):678-682. doi: 10.6026/973206300200678. eCollection 2024.
2
Microleakage and Bacterial Adhesion with Three Restorative Materials Used to Seal Screw-access Channels of Implant Abutments: An Study.三种用于封闭种植体基台螺丝通道的修复材料的微渗漏及细菌黏附：一项研究
Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2021 Sep-Dec;9(3):241-247. doi: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_76_20. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
3
Evaluation of microleakage and push-out bond strength of various composite resins for sealing the screw-access channel in implant-supported restorations.评价各种复合树脂用于密封种植体支持修复体螺丝通道的微渗漏和推出粘结强度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Oct;128(4):764.e1-764.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.07.008.
4
Microleakage of different sealing materials in access holes of internal connection implant systems.不同密封材料在内部连接种植体系统接入孔中的微渗漏。
J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Sep;108(3):173-80. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60143-7.
5
The influence of a composite resin adhesive on microleakage into the implant screw access chamber.复合树脂黏结剂对种植体螺钉通道微渗漏的影响。
Aust Dent J. 2022 Mar;67(1):39-45. doi: 10.1111/adj.12879. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
6
Evaluation of sealing efficacy and removal convenience of sealing materials for implant abutment screw access holes.评价种植体基台螺丝孔封闭材料的密封效果和去除便利性。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Aug 25;22(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02403-y.
7
Efficacy of Various Implant Abutment Screw Access Channel Sealing Materials in Preventing Microleakage: A Systematic Review.各种种植体基台螺钉通道封闭材料在预防微渗漏方面的疗效：一项系统评价
J Oral Implantol. 2022 Oct 1;48(5):455-463. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-21-00085.
8
Microgap and bacterial microleakage during the osseointegration period: An in vitro assessment of the cover screw and healing abutment in a platform-switched implant system.在骨整合期的微间隙和细菌微渗漏：一种在平台转换种植体系统中对覆盖螺丝和愈合基台的体外评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Jul;130(1):87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.07.030. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
9
Microbiological Comparison of Different Sealing Materials for the Access Holes of Implant Restorations.不同种植体修复体洞口封闭材料的微生物学比较
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2022 Mar 14;20:119-126. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b2805461.
10
Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth with different dowel systems.采用不同桩核系统的根管治疗牙的微渗漏
J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Aug;92(2):163-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.05.004.
本文引用的文献
1
An In-Vitro Evaluation of Microleakage in Resin-Based Restorative Materials at Different Time Intervals.不同时间间隔下树脂基修复材料微渗漏的体外评估
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Jan 24;14(3):466. doi: 10.3390/polym14030466.
2
Adverse effects of salivary contamination for adhesives in restorative dentistry. A literature review.唾液污染对口腔修复学中黏结剂的不良影响。一篇文献综述。
Am J Dent. 2017 Jun;30(3):156-164.
3
Microleakage at the Different Implant Abutment Interface: A Systematic Review.不同种植体基台界面的微渗漏：一项系统评价
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jun;11(6):ZE10-ZE15. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/28951.10054. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
4
Comparison of access-hole filling materials for screw retained implant prostheses: 12-month in vivo study.用于螺丝固位种植体修复体的接入孔填充材料比较：12个月体内研究
Int J Implant Dent. 2017 Dec;3(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40729-017-0076-4. Epub 2017 May 5.
5
Dental materials and their performance for the management of screw access channels in implant-supported restorations.牙科材料及其在种植体支持修复体中螺钉通道管理方面的性能。
Dent Mater J. 2017 Mar 31;36(2):123-128. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2016-049. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
6
Screw retained vs. cement retained implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis.螺钉固位与粘结固位的种植体支持固定义齿修复。
Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):141-151. doi: 10.1111/prd.12168.
7
Bacterial adhesion on direct and indirect dental restorative composite resins: An in vitro study on a natural biofilm.细菌在直接和间接牙科修复复合树脂上的黏附：自然生物膜的体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 May;117(5):669-676. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.022. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
8
Covering the Implant Prosthesis Screw Access Hole: A Biological Approach to Material Selection and Technique.覆盖种植体修复螺丝接入孔：材料选择与技术的生物学方法
J Oral Implantol. 2017 Feb;43(1):39-44. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00119. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
9
Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Provisional Crown and Bridge Materials-An Invitro Study.临时冠桥材料抗弯强度的比较评估——一项体外研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Aug;10(8):ZC72-7. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/19582.8291. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
10
Utilization of Ceramic Inlays for Sealing Implant Prostheses Screw Access Holes: A Case-Control Study.陶瓷嵌体用于密封种植体修复体螺丝通道孔的应用：一项病例对照研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Sep-Oct;31(5):1142-9. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4733.
Zotero 插件