Tanimura Rémy, Suzuki Shiro
, 8, place du Général Catroux, 75017, Paris, France.
Department of Clinical Community and Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Dentistry, 1919 7th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35294-0007, USA.
Int J Implant Dent. 2017 Dec;3(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40729-017-0076-4. Epub 2017 May 5.
Screw retained implant prostheses seem to be an efficient restorative method to prevent peri-implantitis caused by cement excess around the abutment. The drawback of the screw-retained prostheses is the difficulty to realize an efficient access-hole filling functionally and aesthetically. Up to now, few in vitro and in vivo studies were reported in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical performances of two direct filling materials through a period of 12 months.
To pursue a previous in vitro evaluation, this in vivo 12 months prospective study followed up and compared the access-hole filling integrity of a modified 4-META (4-methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride)/MMA-TBB (methyl methacrylate-tri-n-butyl borane) - based resin (M4M) and a photo-polymerizing nano-hybrid composite resin (CR). Twenty-eight access-holes were filled with both materials respectively, then impressions and intra-oral photographs were taken at T = 0, T = 1 M (month), 3, 6, and 12 M. The access-hole surface measurement and the margin analysis (depth and angle) were carried out. The VAS (visual analogue scale) value on marginal discoloration and integrity at the baseline T = 0 and T = 12 M was recorded.
The mean values of the surface areas changes from T = 1 to T = 12 M were 83.3 ± 11.5% for group CR and 77.1 ± 13.1% for group M4M, respectively. (Mann-Whitney test p < 0.05, p = 0.046). The mean marginal depth at T = 12 M for group CR were 141.2 ± 125.5 μm and 132.1 ± 107.8 μm for the group M4M, respectively. (Mann-Whitney test p > 0.05, p = 0.58). The mean values of the angle formed at the margin (T = 12 M) were for group CR 39.5 ± 19.4° and 28.2 ± 17.2° for group M4M, respectively (Mann-Whitney test p < 0.0001). The photographical analysis by VAS values showed no significant difference between CR and M4M groups (Mann-Whitney test p > 0.05, p = 0.848).
Based on intra- and extra-oral evaluations with the limitation, both CR and M4M combined with a ceramic primer are indicated as promising materials to fill the access-hole. Further long-term investigation is necessary to confirm this finding.
螺丝固位种植体修复似乎是一种有效的修复方法,可预防基台周围因多余粘固剂导致的种植体周围炎。螺丝固位修复体的缺点在于难以在功能和美学方面实现有效的通路孔填充。迄今为止,文献中报道的体外和体内研究较少。本研究的目的是在12个月的时间内评估两种直接填充材料的临床性能。
为了继续之前的体外评估,本12个月的体内前瞻性研究对基于改性4-META(4-甲基丙烯酰氧基乙基偏苯三酸酐)/MMA-TBB(甲基丙烯酸甲酯-三正丁基硼烷)的树脂(M4M)和光聚合纳米混合复合树脂(CR)的通路孔填充完整性进行了随访和比较。分别用这两种材料填充28个通路孔,然后在T = 0、T = 1个月、3、6和12个月时进行印模和口内照片拍摄。进行通路孔表面测量和边缘分析(深度和角度)。记录基线T = 0和T = 12个月时边缘变色和完整性的视觉模拟量表(VAS)值。
从T = 1到T = 12个月,CR组表面积变化的平均值分别为83.3±11.5%,M4M组为77.1±13.1%。(曼-惠特尼检验p < 0.05,p = 0.046)。CR组在T = 12个月时的平均边缘深度分别为141.2±125.5μm,M4M组为132.1±107.8μm。(曼-惠特尼检验p > 0.05,p = 0.58)。边缘处形成的角度(T = 12个月)的平均值,CR组为39.5±19.4°,M4M组为28.2±17.2°(曼-惠特尼检验p < 0.0001)。通过VAS值进行的照片分析显示CR组和M4M组之间无显著差异(曼-惠特尼检验p > 0.05,p = 0.848)。
基于有局限性的口内和口外评估,CR和M4M与陶瓷底漆结合均被认为是填充通路孔的有前景的材料。需要进一步的长期研究来证实这一发现。