Suppr超能文献

ILLUMENATE关键试验与欧盟随机对照试验合并数据的五年独立患者水平死亡率分析

Five-Year Independent Patient-Level Mortality Analysis of the Pooled ILLUMENATE Pivotal and EU Randomized Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Lyden Sean P, Brodmann Marianne, Schroeder Henrik, Holden Andrew, Ouriel Kenneth, Tarra Trisha R, Gray William A

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Division of Angiology, Medical University Graz, Austria.

出版信息

J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Jul 12;2(4):100634. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.100634. eCollection 2023 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a need to evaluate the latest information regarding a potential late safety signal in patients treated with paclitaxel-coated devices for peripheral artery disease. We evaluated the 5-year all-cause mortality rate of the Stellarex drug-coated balloon (DCB) compared with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA).

METHODS

An independent third-party performed a patient-level meta-analysis of the pooled ILLUMENATE Pivotal and EU randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was time to death. Kaplan-Meier estimates of all-cause mortality were compared with the log-rank test. Predictors of mortality were assessed with Cox proportional hazard modeling. A blinded clinical events committee adjudicated all serious adverse events (including death). The follow-up was 60 months.

RESULTS

A total of 589 patients were followed for a median of 4.9 years (IQR, 4.8, 5.1 years); 419 were randomized to Stellarex DCB and 170 to PTA. Vital status was obtained for 93.8%. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from all-cause death were 80.4% (95% CI, 76.7%-84.3%) in the Stellarex DCB arm versus 80.4% (95% CI, 74.3%-86.5%) in the PTA arm (log-rank, = .7754). There was no difference in all-cause mortality when stratified by paclitaxel dose terciles. Predictors of mortality included renal insufficiency, reference vessel diameter, age, and lesion length, but not paclitaxel dose nor paclitaxel exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in all-cause mortality between the Stellarex DCB and PTA through the final 5-year follow-up window of 2 ILLUMENATE randomized controlled trials. These long-term data build on the previously reported safety of the Stellarex DCB for treating symptomatic femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease.

摘要

背景

有必要评估关于接受紫杉醇涂层器械治疗外周动脉疾病患者潜在迟发性安全信号的最新信息。我们比较了Stellarex药物涂层球囊(DCB)与经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)的5年全因死亡率。

方法

由独立第三方对汇总的ILLUMENATE关键试验和欧盟随机对照试验进行患者水平的荟萃分析。主要结局为死亡时间。采用对数秩检验比较全因死亡率的Kaplan-Meier估计值。用Cox比例风险模型评估死亡率的预测因素。由一个盲法临床事件委员会判定所有严重不良事件(包括死亡)。随访时间为60个月。

结果

共对589例患者进行了中位时间为4.9年(四分位间距,4.8,5.1年)的随访;419例随机分配至Stellarex DCB组,170例随机分配至PTA组。93.8%的患者获得了生存状态信息。Stellarex DCB组5年Kaplan-Meier估计的全因死亡无事件生存率为80.4%(95%CI,76.7%-84.3%),PTA组为80.4%(95%CI,74.3%-86.5%)(对数秩检验,P = 0.7754)。按紫杉醇剂量三分位数分层时,全因死亡率无差异。死亡率的预测因素包括肾功能不全、参考血管直径、年龄和病变长度,但不包括紫杉醇剂量和紫杉醇暴露情况。

结论

在ILLUMENATE两项随机对照试验的最后5年随访期内,Stellarex DCB与PTA的全因死亡率无差异。这些长期数据进一步证实了之前报道的Stellarex DCB治疗有症状股腘外周动脉疾病的安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b148/11308630/dfe13bf63346/fx1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验