Wei Xiao, Zhao Yun, Yan Wenyue, Dai Qigang, Wu Hui, Miao Yang, Huang Lei, Liu Qing, Zhang Xuyao, Wang Hongxia, Liu Yanan, Zhang Linlin
Department of Pharmacy, The First People's Hospital of Yancheng, Yancheng No.1 People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Yancheng, Jiangsu, 224000, People's Republic of China.
Department of Oncology, The First People's Hospital of Yancheng, Yancheng No.1 People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Yancheng, Jiangsu, 224000, People's Republic of China.
Onco Targets Ther. 2024 Aug 6;17:629-642. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S468932. eCollection 2024.
Anlotinib and apatinib, both vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs), are clinically established in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in China, with anlotinib emerging as a standard treatment strategy. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib and anlotinib, and to compare their differences in treating patients with advanced NSCLC.
We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with apatinib or anlotinib at a hospital in Eastern China from January 2017 to December 2021. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety profile.
A total of 145 patients were included in this study. Median PFS (mPFS) was 3.53 months for the apatinib group and 5.3 months for the anlotinib group (HR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.41-0.84; P = 0.004), and median OS (mOS) was 7.6 months versus 15.6 months (HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.46-1.00; P = 0.048), which all showed significant differences after adjusting for confounders (P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed that the presence or absence of bone metastases significantly influenced PFS in both treatment groups. The ORR was 3.03% in the anlotinib group versus 10.13% in the apatinib group (P = 0.12), the DCR was 72.73% versus 51.90% (P = 0.21). No unanticipated adverse events (AEs) were observed. The incidence of grade 3-4 AEs was significantly higher in the apatinib group (31.65% vs 13.64%, P < 0.05).
Anlotinib demonstrated greater efficacy and safety compared to apatinib in the treatment of advanced NSCLC, particularly in patients with bone metastases and EGFR(-).
安罗替尼和阿帕替尼均为血管内皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(VEGFR-TKIs),在中国已被临床确立用于治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC),安罗替尼已成为一种标准治疗策略。本研究旨在评估阿帕替尼和安罗替尼的疗效和安全性,并比较它们在治疗晚期NSCLC患者中的差异。
我们回顾性分析了2017年1月至2021年12月在中国东部一家医院接受阿帕替尼或安罗替尼治疗的晚期NSCLC患者的数据。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS),次要终点包括客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、总生存期(OS)和安全性。
本研究共纳入145例患者。阿帕替尼组的中位PFS(mPFS)为3.53个月,安罗替尼组为5.3个月(HR = 0.59,95%CI:0.41-0.84;P = 0.004),中位OS(mOS)分别为7.6个月和15.6个月(HR = 0.68,95%CI:0.46-1.00;P = 0.048),在调整混杂因素后均显示出显著差异(P < 0.