Mackala Krzysztof, Omelko Rafał, Mroczek Dariusz, Szczepan Stefan, Mastalerz Andrzej
Department of Track and Field, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, Wroclaw, Poland.
Department of Biological and Motor Sport Bases, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, Wroclaw, Poland.
J Hum Kinet. 2024 May 17;93:181-191. doi: 10.5114/jhk/185155. eCollection 2024 Jul.
This study aimed to determine changes in the kinematics of sprint steps based on progressive muscular fatigue during high-intensity 350-m and 500-m trials. Twelve elite healthy male 400-m sprinters with a minimum of six years of regular sprint training experience were recruited. They were divided into two groups for the experiment: a 350-m and a 500-m trial group. Time and kinematics of sprinting step motion for specific segments, i.e., starting to final stages of each trial, were obtained using the Opto Jump-Microgate optical measurement system. The starting phase of each sprint was defined as the section without muscular fatigue (noF), and the final phase was the sprint under muscular fatigue (onF). Each last 25 m of the 50-m evaluated section containing ten complete running steps was selected for detailed statistical analysis. Various patterns of temporal and spatial variables of sprinting efforts were observed between 350-m and 500-m trials. Each trial result was influenced by significant individual changes (p < 0.05). All variables indicated that the two distances differed significantly in terms of running kinematics. This was confirmed by significant differences in the mean step frequency (p < 0.001), which presented a difference of 11.75%, and the mean step speed (p < 0.001). As a result of these changes, a hierarchical intermittent endurance training pattern was defined. The research concluded that special endurance (intermittent sprints) based on 350 m differed significantly in kinematics from sprints over 500 m. Therefore, it should be assumed that the distance of 350 m is more similar in its kinematics to the 400-m competition. This should encourage coaches and athletes to apply a 350-m distance in training developing special endurance, especially in the pre-competitive and competitive periods.
本研究旨在确定在高强度350米和500米测试中,基于渐进性肌肉疲劳的短跑步运动学变化。招募了12名精英健康男性400米短跑运动员,他们至少有六年的常规短跑训练经验。将他们分为两组进行实验:350米测试组和500米测试组。使用Opto Jump-Microgate光学测量系统获取每个测试特定阶段(即从每个测试的开始到结束阶段)短跑步运动的时间和运动学数据。每次短跑的起始阶段定义为无肌肉疲劳阶段(noF),最后阶段为肌肉疲劳状态下的短跑阶段(onF)。从50米评估段的最后25米中选取包含十个完整跑步步幅的部分进行详细统计分析。在350米和500米测试之间观察到了短跑努力的各种时间和空间变量模式。每个测试结果都受到显著个体变化的影响(p < 0.05)。所有变量表明,这两个距离在跑步运动学方面存在显著差异。平均步频(p < 0.001)存在显著差异,相差11.75%,平均步速(p < 0.001)也存在显著差异,证实了这一点。由于这些变化,定义了一种分层间歇耐力训练模式。研究得出结论,基于350米的专项耐力(间歇短跑)在运动学上与超过500米的短跑有显著差异。因此,可以认为350米的距离在运动学上与400米比赛更相似。这应鼓励教练和运动员在发展专项耐力的训练中应用350米的距离,特别是在赛前和比赛期间。