Root Zachary T, Wu Zhenxing, Lepley Thomas J, Schneller Aspen R, Chapman Robbie J, Formanek Veronica L, Kelly Kathleen M, Otto Bradley A, Zhao Kai
Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2024 Dec;14(12):1869-1881. doi: 10.1002/alr.23422. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
A patient's subjective response to topical nasal decongestant is often used to screen for turbinate reduction surgery suitability. However, this anecdotal strategy has not been objectively and quantitatively evaluated.
Prospective, longitudinal, and single-blinded cohort study employing computational fluid dynamic modeling based on computed tomography scans at baseline, 30 min postoxymetazoline, and 2 months postsurgery on 11 patients with chronic turbinate hypertrophy.
Nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) and visual analogue scale (VAS) obstruction scores significantly improved from baseline to postoxymetazoline and again to postsurgery (NOSE: 71.82 ± 14.19 to 42.27 ± 25.26 to 22.27 ± 21.04; VAS: 6.09 ± 2.41 to 4.14 ± 2.20 to 2.08 ± 1.56; each interaction p < 0.05), with significant correlation between the latter two states (r∼0.37-0.69, p < 0.05). Oxymetazoline had a broader anatomical impact throughout inferior and middle turbinates than surgery (many p < 0.05); however, the improvement in regional airflow is similar (most p > 0.05) and predominantly surrounding the inferior turbinate. Strong postoxymetazoline to postsurgery correlations were observed in decreased nasal resistance (r = 0.79, p < 0.05), increased regional airflow rates (r = -0.47 to -0.55, p < 0.05) and regional air/mucosa shear force and heat flux (r = 0.43 to 0.58, p < 0.05); however, only increasing peak heat flux significantly correlated to symptom score improvement (NOSE: r = 0.48, p < 0.05).
We present the first objective evidence that the "topical decongestant test" can help predict turbinate reduction surgery outcomes. The predictive effect is driven by similar improvementin regional airflow that leading to improved air/mucosa stimulations (peak heat flux) rather than through reduced nasal resistance.
患者对局部鼻减充血剂的主观反应常被用于筛查下鼻甲缩小手术的适用性。然而,这种经验性策略尚未得到客观和定量的评估。
对11例慢性下鼻甲肥大患者进行前瞻性、纵向、单盲队列研究,基于基线、使用羟甲唑啉后30分钟及术后2个月的计算机断层扫描进行计算流体动力学建模。
从基线到使用羟甲唑啉后以及再到术后,鼻阻塞症状评估(NOSE)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)阻塞评分均显著改善(NOSE:71.82±14.19至42.27±25.26至22.27±21.04;VAS:6.09±2.41至4.14±2.20至2.08±1.56;各交互作用p<0.05),后两种状态之间存在显著相关性(r约为0.37 - 0.69,p<0.05)。羟甲唑啉在下鼻甲和中鼻甲的解剖学影响范围比手术更广(许多p<0.05);然而,区域气流的改善相似(大多数p>0.05),且主要围绕下鼻甲。在鼻阻力降低(r = 0.79,p<0.05)、区域气流速率增加(r = -0.47至-0.55,p<0.05)以及区域空气/黏膜剪切力和热通量增加(r = 0.43至0.58)方面,观察到使用羟甲唑啉后与术后有很强的相关性;然而,只有峰值热通量增加与症状评分改善显著相关(NOSE:r = 0.48,p<0.05)。
我们提供了首个客观证据,表明“局部减充血剂试验”有助于预测下鼻甲缩小手术的结果。预测效果是由区域气流的类似改善驱动的这种改善导致空气/黏膜刺激(峰值热通量)增强,而非通过降低鼻阻力实现。