Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Villanova University, Villanova, PA.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019 Feb;9(2):204-211. doi: 10.1002/alr.22236. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
Empty nose syndrome (ENS) is a rare and debilitating disease with a controversial definition, etiology, and treatment. One puzzling fact is that patients who undergo an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) often have resection of multiple anatomic structures, yet seldom develop ENS. In this pilot study, we analyzed and compared the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and symptoms among post-EEA patients, ENS patients, and healthy subjects.
Computed tomography scans of 4 post-EEA patients were collected and analyzed using CFD techniques. Two patients had significant ENS symptoms based on results of the Empty Nose Syndrome 6-item Questionnaire (score >11), whereas the other 2 were asymptomatic. As a reference, their results were compared with previously published CFD results of 27 non-EEA ENS patients and 42 healthy controls.
Post-EEA patients with ENS symptoms had a similar nasal airflow pattern as non-EEA ENS patients. This pattern differed significantly from that of EEA patients without ENS symptoms and healthy controls. Overall, groups with ENS symptoms exhibited airflow dominant in the middle meatus region and a significantly lower percentage of airflow in the inferior turbinate region (EEA with ENS, 17.74 ± 4.00% vs EEA without ENS, 51.25 ± 3.33% [t test, p < 0.02]; non-EEA ENS, 25.8 ± 17.6%; healthy subjects, 36.5 ± 15.9%) as well as lower peak wall shear stress (EEA with ENS, 0.30 ± 0.13 Pa vs EEA without ENS, 0.61 ± 0.03 Pa [p = 0.003]; non-EEA ENS, 0.58 ± 0.24 Pa; healthy subjects, 1.18 ± 0.81 Pa).
These results suggest that turbinectomy and/or posterior septectomy may have a varying functional impact and that ENS symptoms go beyond anatomy and correlate with aerodynamic changes. The findings open the door for CFD as a potential objective diagnosis tool for ENS.
空鼻综合征(ENS)是一种罕见且虚弱的疾病,其定义、病因和治疗方法存在争议。一个令人困惑的事实是,接受内镜鼻窦内进路(EEA)的患者通常会切除多个解剖结构,但很少出现 ENS。在这项初步研究中,我们分析和比较了 EEA 后患者、ENS 患者和健康受试者的计算流体动力学(CFD)和症状。
收集并分析了 4 名 EEA 后患者的计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描数据,使用 CFD 技术进行分析。根据空鼻综合征 6 项问卷(得分>11)的结果,有 2 名患者出现明显的 ENS 症状,而另外 2 名患者无症状。作为参考,将他们的结果与之前发表的 27 名非 EEA ENS 患者和 42 名健康对照者的 CFD 结果进行比较。
有 ENS 症状的 EEA 后患者的鼻腔气流模式与非 EEA ENS 患者相似。该模式与无症状 EEA 患者和健康对照组有显著差异。总的来说,有 ENS 症状的组表现出中鼻甲区域主导气流,下鼻甲区域气流明显减少(EEA 伴 ENS,17.74±4.00%比 EEA 无 ENS,51.25±3.33%[t 检验,p<0.02];非 EEA ENS,25.8±17.6%;健康对照组,36.5±15.9%)以及较低的峰值壁切应力(EEA 伴 ENS,0.30±0.13Pa 比 EEA 无 ENS,0.61±0.03Pa[p=0.003];非 EEA ENS,0.58±0.24Pa;健康对照组,1.18±0.81Pa)。
这些结果表明,鼻甲切除术和/或后鼻中隔切除术可能具有不同的功能影响,ENS 症状不仅仅是解剖结构,而且与气流动力学变化有关。这些发现为 CFD 作为 ENS 的潜在客观诊断工具开辟了道路。