Suppr超能文献

采用交叉技术的冷冻球囊后壁隔离术在持续性心房颤动中的临床影响

Clinical impact of cryoballoon posterior wall isolation using the cross-over technique in persistent atrial fibrillation.

作者信息

Odagiri Fuminori, Tokano Takashi, Miyazaki Tetsuro, Hirabayashi Koji, Ishi Kai, Abe Hiroshi, Ishiwata Sayaki, Kakihara Midori, Maki Masaaki, Matsumoto Hiroki, Shimai Ryosuke, Aikawa Tadao, Takano Shintaro, Kimura Yuki, Kuroda Shunsuke, Isogai Hiroyuki, Ozaki Dai, Shiozawa Tomoyuki, Yasuda Yuki, Takasu Kiyoshi, Iijima Kenichi, Takamura Kazuhisa, Matsubara Tomomi, Tabuchi Haruna, Hayashi Hidemori, Yokoyama Ken, Sekita Gaku, Sumiyoshi Masataka, Nakazato Yuji, Minamino Tohru

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

Department of Cardiology, Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2024 Oct;47(10):1326-1337. doi: 10.1111/pace.15058. Epub 2024 Aug 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Successful left atrial posterior wall isolation (LAPWI) using only the cryoballoon (CB) is technically challenging for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the cross-over technique, wherein an overlapped ablation is performed by placing the CB from both directions in contact with the LAPW.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study of 194 consecutive patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) who underwent a first-time procedure of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) + PWI (108 patients) or PVI-only (86 patients) using the CB. The cross-over technique was applied in all LAPWI.

RESULTS

For ablation of the LA roof and bottom, respectively, a mean of 8.6 ± 1.0 (right to left [R→L] 4.3 ± 1.1 and left to right [L→R] 4.3 ± 1.1) and 9.1 ± 1.2 (R→L 4.6 ± 1.6 and L→R 4.5 ± 1.2) CB applications were delivered. LAPW was successfully isolated solely using the CB in 99.1% of patients. Although the PVI + PWI group had significantly longer procedure time, no severe adverse events were observed in either group. During a median follow-up of 19 months, freedom from recurrence of all atrial tachyarrhythmias was achieved in 93.5% of the PVI + PWI group and 72.9% of the PVI-only group (p = .011).

CONCLUSIONS

LAPWI performed solely with the CB using the cross-over technique is feasibly, safe, and was independently associated with a significantly higher freedom from recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias compared with PVI alone in patients with PerAF.

摘要

背景与目的

仅使用冷冻球囊(CB)成功进行左心房后壁隔离(LAPWI)在房颤(AF)治疗中具有技术挑战性。本研究旨在评估交叉技术的疗效,该技术通过从两个方向放置CB与左心房后壁接触进行重叠消融。

方法

这是一项单中心、回顾性、观察性研究,纳入194例连续的持续性房颤(PerAF)患者,他们首次接受了使用CB进行的肺静脉隔离(PVI)+后壁隔离(PWI)(108例患者)或仅PVI(86例患者)手术。所有LAPWI均应用交叉技术。

结果

分别在消融左心房顶部和底部时,平均进行了8.6±1.0次(从右到左[R→L]4.3±1.1次和从左到右[L→R]4.3±1.1次)和9.1±1.2次(R→L 4.6±1.6次和L→R 4.5±1.2次)CB应用。99.1%的患者仅使用CB成功隔离了左心房后壁。虽然PVI+PWI组的手术时间明显更长,但两组均未观察到严重不良事件。在中位随访19个月期间,PVI+PWI组93.5%的患者和仅PVI组72.9%的患者实现了所有房性快速性心律失常无复发(p=0.011)。

结论

在PerAF患者中,使用交叉技术仅用CB进行LAPWI是可行、安全的,并且与单独进行PVI相比,独立地与房性快速性心律失常复发率显著降低相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验