Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
Department of Health and Nutrition, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2427258. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.27258.
Despite its demonstrated benefits in improving cardiovascular risk profiles, the association of tirzepatide with mortality and cardiovascular and kidney outcomes compared with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) remains unknown.
To investigate the association of tirzepatide with mortality and adverse cardiovascular and kidney outcomes compared with GLP-1 RAs in patients with type 2 diabetes.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study used US Collaborative Network of TriNetX data collected on individuals with type 2 diabetes aged 18 years or older initiating tirzepatide or GLP-1 RA between June 1, 2022, and June 30, 2023; without stage 5 chronic kidney disease or kidney failure at baseline; and without myocardial infarction or ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within 60 days of drug initiation.
Treatment with tirzepatide compared with GLP-1 RA.
The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), the composite of MACEs and all-cause mortality, kidney events, acute kidney injury, and major adverse kidney events. All outcomes were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression models.
There were 14 834 patients treated with tirzepatide (mean [SD] age, 55.4 [11.8] years; 8444 [56.9%] female) and 125 474 treated with GLP-1 RA (mean [SD] age, 58.1 [13.3] years; 67 474 [53.8%] female). After a median (IQR) follow-up of 10.5 (5.2-15.7) months, 95 patients (0.6%) in the tirzepatide group and 166 (1.1%) in the GLP-1 RA group died. Tirzepatide treatment was associated with lower hazards of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45-0.75), MACEs (AHR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71-0.91), the composite of MACEs and all-cause mortality (AHR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.84), kidney events (AHR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37-0.73), acute kidney injury (AHR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.70-0.88), and major adverse kidney events (AHR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.44-0.67). Treatment with tirzepatide was associated with greater decreases in glycated hemoglobin (treatment difference, -0.34 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.44 to -0.24 percentage points) and body weight (treatment difference, -2.9 kg, 95% CI, -4.8 to -1.1 kg) compared with GLP-1 RA. An interaction test for subgroup analysis revealed consistent results stratified by estimated glomerular filtration rate, glycated hemoglobin level, body mass index, comedications, and comorbidities.
In this study, treatment with tirzepatide was associated with lower hazards of all-cause mortality, adverse cardiovascular events, acute kidney injury, and adverse kidney events compared with GLP-1 RA in patients with type 2 diabetes. These findings support the integration of tirzepatide into therapeutic strategies for this population.
重要性:尽管曲格列汀在改善心血管风险方面已被证实有效,但与胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)相比,曲格列汀对死亡率和心血管及肾脏结局的影响仍不清楚。
目的:在患有 2 型糖尿病的患者中,研究与 GLP-1 RAs 相比,替西帕肽与死亡率及不良心血管和肾脏结局的关联。
设计、设置和参与者:本回顾性队列研究使用美国合作网络的 TriNetX 数据,收集 2022 年 6 月 1 日至 2023 年 6 月 30 日期间开始接受替西帕肽或 GLP-1 RA 治疗的年龄在 18 岁或以上的 2 型糖尿病患者的数据;基线时无 5 期慢性肾脏病或肾衰竭;并且在药物起始后 60 天内无心肌梗死或缺血性或出血性卒中。
暴露:与 GLP-1 RA 相比,接受替西帕肽治疗。
主要结局和测量指标:主要结局为全因死亡率,次要结局包括主要不良心血管事件(MACEs)、MACEs 和全因死亡率的复合结局、肾脏事件、急性肾损伤和主要不良肾脏事件。所有结局均使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型进行分析。
结果:共有 14834 例患者接受替西帕肽治疗(平均[标准差]年龄为 55.4[11.8]岁;8444[56.9%]为女性)和 125474 例接受 GLP-1 RA 治疗(平均[标准差]年龄为 58.1[13.3]岁;67474[53.8%]为女性)。中位(IQR)随访 10.5(5.2-15.7)个月后,替西帕肽组有 95 例(0.6%)和 GLP-1 RA 组有 166 例(1.1%)患者死亡。与 GLP-1 RA 相比,替西帕肽治疗与较低的全因死亡率(校正后危险比[AHR],0.58;95%CI,0.45-0.75)、MACEs(AHR,0.80;95%CI,0.71-0.91)、MACEs 和全因死亡率的复合结局(AHR,0.76;95%CI,0.68-0.84)、肾脏事件(AHR,0.52;95%CI,0.37-0.73)、急性肾损伤(AHR,0.78;95%CI,0.70-0.88)和主要不良肾脏事件(AHR,0.54;95%CI,0.44-0.67)相关。与 GLP-1 RA 相比,替西帕肽治疗可显著降低糖化血红蛋白(治疗差异,-0.34 个百分点;95%CI,-0.44 至-0.24 个百分点)和体重(治疗差异,-2.9 公斤,95%CI,-4.8 至-1.1 公斤)。亚组分析的交互检验显示,在估计肾小球滤过率、糖化血红蛋白水平、体重指数、合并用药和合并症分层时,结果一致。
结论和相关性:在这项研究中,与 GLP-1 RA 相比,在患有 2 型糖尿病的患者中,替西帕肽治疗与较低的全因死亡率、不良心血管事件、急性肾损伤和不良肾脏事件相关。这些发现支持将替西帕肽纳入该人群的治疗策略。