McGregor Jessina C, Wilson Geneva M, Gibson Gretchen, Jurasic M Marianne, Evans Charlesnika T, Suda Katie J
Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Oregon State University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare (CINCCH), Hines Jr. Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, Illinois, USA.
J Public Health Dent. 2024 Dec;84(4):343-350. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12634. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
We aimed to evaluate the association between antibiotic prophylaxis and adverse outcomes following tooth extraction within the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing dental extractions in 2015-2019. The primary exposure was antibiotic prophylaxis. The primary outcome was post-extraction complication within 7 days (e.g., alveolar osteitis and surgical site infection); the secondary outcome was subsequent medical care relating to a post-extraction oral complication within 7 days. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed the independent effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on each outcome.
Of 385,880 visits with a dental extraction, 122,810 (31.8%) received antibiotic prophylaxis. Overall, 3387 (0.9%) experienced a post-extraction complication and 350 (0.09%) received medical care relating to a post-extraction oral complication within 7 days. In multivariable regression, diabetes was a statistically significant (p = 0.01) effect modifier of the association between antibiotic prophylaxis and post-extraction complication. Among visits for patients without diabetes, antibiotic prophylaxis was significantly associated with an increased odds of post-extraction complication (odds ratio [OR] = 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-1.38), but among visits for patients with diabetes no significant effect was observed (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.92-1.15). Antibiotic prophylaxis was not significantly associated with post-extraction medical care (OR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.83-1.30).
In this large retrospective cohort, we observed no significant protective effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on post-extraction complications or subsequent medical care utilization in a setting with low complication rates. These data suggest that use of antibiotic prophylaxis in similar settings may need to be re-evaluated to minimize unnecessary antibiotic use.
我们旨在评估退伍军人事务医疗系统中拔牙后抗生素预防与不良结局之间的关联。
我们对2015年至2019年接受拔牙的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。主要暴露因素是抗生素预防。主要结局是拔牙后7天内的并发症(如干槽症和手术部位感染);次要结局是拔牙后7天内与拔牙后口腔并发症相关的后续医疗护理。多变量逻辑回归模型评估了抗生素预防对每个结局的独立影响。
在385,880次拔牙就诊中,122,810例(31.8%)接受了抗生素预防。总体而言,3387例(0.9%)出现了拔牙后并发症,350例(0.09%)在拔牙后7天内接受了与拔牙后口腔并发症相关的医疗护理。在多变量回归中,糖尿病是抗生素预防与拔牙后并发症之间关联的一个具有统计学意义(p = 0.01)的效应修饰因素。在无糖尿病患者的就诊中,抗生素预防与拔牙后并发症的几率增加显著相关(比值比[OR] = 1.25,95%置信区间[CI]:1.13 - 1.38),但在糖尿病患者的就诊中未观察到显著影响(OR = 1.03,95% CI:0.92 - 1.15)。抗生素预防与拔牙后医疗护理无显著关联(OR = 1.04;95% CI:0.83 - 1.30)。
在这个大型回顾性队列中,我们发现在并发症发生率较低的情况下,抗生素预防对拔牙后并发症或后续医疗护理利用没有显著的保护作用。这些数据表明,在类似情况下使用抗生素预防可能需要重新评估,以尽量减少不必要的抗生素使用。