Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Department of Veterans' Affairs (VA), VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Nov;43(11):1565-1574. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.521. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
To determine prophylaxis appropriateness by Veterans' Affairs (VA) dentists.
A cross-sectional study of dental visits, 2015-2019.
Antibiotics within 7 days before a visit in the absence of an oral infection were included. Appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis was defined as visits with gingival manipulation and further delineated into narrow and broad definitions based on comorbidities. The primary analysis applied a narrow definition of appropriate prophylaxis: cardiac conditions at the highest risk of an adverse outcome from endocarditis. The secondary analysis included a broader definition: cardiac or immunocompromising condition or tooth extractions and/or implants. Multivariable log-linear Poisson generalized estimating equation regression was used to assess the association between covariates and unnecessary prophylaxis prescriptions.
In total, 358,078 visits were associated with 369,102 antibiotics. The median prescription duration was 7 days (IQR, 7-10); only 6.5% were prescribed for 1 day. With the narrow definition, 15% of prophylaxis prescriptions were appropriate, which increased to 72% with the broader definition. Prophylaxis inconsistent with guidelines increased over time. For the narrow definition, Black (vs White) race, Latine (vs non-Latine) ethnicity, and visits located in the West census region were associated with unnecessary prophylaxis. Variables associated with a lower risk were older age, prosthetic joints, immunocompromising condition, and rural location.
Of every 6 antibiotic prophylaxis prescriptions, 5 were inconsistent with guidelines. Improving prophylaxis appropriateness and shortening duration may have substantial implications for stewardship. Guidelines should state whether antibiotic prophylaxis is indicated for extractions, implants, and immunocompromised patients.
确定退伍军人事务部(VA)牙医的预防措施是否适当。
对 2015-2019 年的牙科就诊进行横断面研究。
在没有口腔感染的情况下,将就诊前 7 天内使用的抗生素包括在内。适当的抗生素预防被定义为进行牙龈操作的就诊,并根据合并症进一步细分为狭义和广义定义。主要分析采用了狭义的适当预防措施定义:患有心脏病的患者,其发生心内膜炎不良后果的风险最高。次要分析包括更广泛的定义:患有心脏病或免疫功能低下的患者,或进行拔牙和/或种植牙的患者。采用多变量对数线性泊松广义估计方程回归来评估协变量与不必要的预防措施处方之间的关系。
共有 358078 次就诊与 369102 次抗生素治疗相关。处方持续时间中位数为 7 天(IQR,7-10);仅 6.5%的处方为 1 天。采用狭义定义,15%的预防措施处方是适当的,而采用广义定义,这一比例增加到 72%。随着时间的推移,不符合指南的预防措施处方不断增加。采用狭义定义时,与不必要的预防措施相关的因素包括:黑人(与白人相比)、拉丁裔(与非拉丁裔相比)种族和就诊地点在西部普查区域。与较低风险相关的变量包括年龄较大、假体关节、免疫功能低下的情况和农村地区。
每 6 次抗生素预防措施处方中,有 5 次与指南不一致。提高预防措施的适当性并缩短持续时间可能对管理产生重大影响。指南应说明是否需要对拔牙、种植牙和免疫功能低下的患者进行抗生素预防。