Slatore Christopher G, Golden Sara E, Schweiger Liana, Ilea Ian, Sullivan Donald R, Rice Sean P M, Wiener Renda Soylemez, Datta Santanu, Davis James M, Melzer Anne C
Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR; Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; National Center for Lung Cancer Screening, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington DC.
Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Chest. 2025 Mar;167(3):876-891. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.06.3817. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
Many organizations recommend clinicians use structured communication processes, referred to as shared decision-making, to improve patient-reported outcomes for patients considering lung cancer screening (LCS).
Which components of high-quality patient-centered communication are associated with decision regret and distress?
We conducted a prospective, longitudinal, repeated measures cohort study among patients undergoing LCS in three different health care systems. We surveyed participants using validated measures of decision regret, decision satisfaction, distress, and patient-clinician communication domains up to 1 year after the low-dose CT (LDCT) imaging for LCS. For longitudinal analyses, we applied a series of generalized estimating equations to measure the association of the patient as person communication domain, screening knowledge, and decision concordance with decision regret and distress.
When assessed 2 to 4 weeks after the LDCT imaging, 202 respondents (58.9%) and eight respondents (2.3%) of 343 total respondents reported mild and moderate or severe decision regret, respectively, whereas 29 respondents (9.2%) of 315 total respondents reported mild distress and 19 respondents (6.0%) reported moderate or greater distress. The mean ± SD decision satisfaction scores (scale, 0-10) were 9.82 ± 0.89, 9.08 ± 1.54, and 6.13 ± 3.40 among those with no, mild, and moderate or severe regret, respectively. Distress scores remained low after the LDCT imaging, even among those with nodules. Patient-centered communication domains were not associated with decision regret or distress.
Our findings show that patients undergoing LCS rarely experience moderate or greater decision regret and distress. Although many participants reported mild decision regret, most were very satisfied over the 1 year after LDCT imaging for LCS. Communication processes were not associated with regret and distress, suggesting that it may be challenging for communication interventions to reduce the harms of LCS.
许多组织建议临床医生采用结构化沟通流程,即共同决策,以改善考虑进行肺癌筛查(LCS)患者的患者报告结局。
高质量的以患者为中心的沟通的哪些组成部分与决策后悔和痛苦相关?
我们在三个不同医疗系统中接受LCS的患者中进行了一项前瞻性、纵向、重复测量队列研究。我们使用经过验证的决策后悔、决策满意度、痛苦以及患者与临床医生沟通领域的测量方法,在LCS的低剂量CT(LDCT)成像后长达1年的时间里对参与者进行调查。对于纵向分析,我们应用一系列广义估计方程来测量患者作为个体的沟通领域、筛查知识以及决策一致性与决策后悔和痛苦之间的关联。
在LDCT成像后2至4周进行评估时,343名总受访者中有202名(58.9%)和8名(2.3%)分别报告有轻度以及中度或重度决策后悔,而315名总受访者中有29名(9.2%)报告有轻度痛苦,19名(6.0%)报告有中度或更严重痛苦。在无后悔、轻度后悔以及中度或重度后悔的人群中,平均±标准差决策满意度得分(范围为0 - 10)分别为9.82±0.89、9.08±1.54和6.13±3.40。即使在有结节的人群中,LDCT成像后痛苦得分仍较低。以患者为中心的沟通领域与决策后悔或痛苦无关。
我们的研究结果表明,接受LCS的患者很少经历中度或更严重的决策后悔和痛苦。尽管许多参与者报告有轻度决策后悔,但大多数人在LCS的LDCT成像后的1年里非常满意。沟通流程与后悔和痛苦无关,这表明沟通干预可能难以减少LCS的危害。